God bless America.
To have previously been a ‘narc’ and basically ‘tattled’ on someone
Ex: “That bitch narced on me…not cool.”
At one time, according to Leftists, an extremely uncool thing to do.
Now, it’s a good thing if it involves snitching on people who may have “insulted” someone in college, or an institution of “higher” (particularly in Colorado or Washington) yearning.
University Launches Insult-Reporting System That Records Offenders’ Social Security Numbers
by Katherine Timpf
It’s for students’ ‘safety.’
The University of Colorado-Boulder has launched an online system where students can report people who make “hurtful statements” — and it’s so intense that it even asks for offenders’ Social Security numbers. This “Bias Incident Reporting” system is intended to “address the impact of demeaning and hurtful statements as well as acts of intolerance directed towards protected classes,” according to the school’s website.
What did I tell you? This example hails from Colorado.
Bias reports are evaluated by the school’s “Bias Incident Response Team” which includes representatives from the office of the dean of students, the Office of Victim Assistance, and even the campus police. The reporting form asks for the meanie-head’s name, gender (better get it right!), e-mail, address, date of birth, phone number and student ID number (if the meanie-head is a student) or a Social Security and/or driver’s license number (if the meanie-head is someone else). It includes a link for “pre-authorized users” to obtain this information if they don’t have it, and the school promises to “track” and “document” all of the reports.
Only the BIRT knows.
But wait; what do we know about social security numbers? Oh yes, that’s right. Control a SSN and you control or rewrite that person’s life for life.
As in: Identity Theft.
Let us continue, shall we?
The reporting form asks for the meanie-head’s name, gender (better get it right!), e-mail, address, date of birth, phone number and student ID number (if the meanie-head is a student) or a Social Security and/or driver’s license number (if the meanie-head is someone else). It includes a link for “pre-authorized users” to obtain this information if they don’t have it, and the school promises to “track” and “document” all of the reports.
Meaning: we know who you are and where you’ve been and now we know what you say and, moreover, what you think.
The Dream Police are finally here.
And here’s the deal:
UC – Boulder defines a “bias incident” as “any conduct or expression in which an individual or group is intentionally targeted and that demeans, degrades or harasses an individual or group based on the actual or perceived basis of race, color, national origin, sex, pregnancy, age, disability, creed, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, veteran status, political affiliation, or political philosophy of another individual or group of individuals.”
Narc your friend, narc your chick, narc your buddy, narc your partner, narc your carpet-muncher, narc anyone. Destroy on sight.
Then, of course, go back to your dope.
Good luck investigating this bullshit, UoC.
“Proclaimed in the fog of dope, it was.”
Just remember: thousands upon thousands of your darker brethren have been shot and killed for much less.
But hey, who cares?
Because that would be, clearly, racist.
First, from KRON Channel 4, in the San Francisco bay area:
Oakland Schools: Students who act up, mouth off won’t be suspended
by Mario Sevilla
OAKLAND (KRON) — The Oakland Unified School District has approved a controversial move to eliminate kicking students out of school for swearing at teachers and ignoring instructions.
The school board voted unanimously on Wednesday to no longer allow teachers and administrators to suspend students out of class for non-violent offenses.
Civil and child rights advocates have been lobbying for such changes based on statistics showing that minority students are disproportionately punished for disobedience.
One commenter in this article indicated: “Future BART employees.” Nicely done.
SFGate.com also weighed in:
Oakland to halt school suspensions for willful defiance
by Jill Tucker
Mouthing off in class or failing to follow a teacher’s instructions will no longer lead to suspension in Oakland schools, a ban that will be phased in and be fully in effect just over a year from now, the school board unanimously decided Wednesday night.
Oakland has been criticized for the disproportionate suspensions, leading to an investigation by the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights and a 2012 voluntary agreement that required the district to employ a range of practices that reduced suspensions. Among them are the district’s Manhood Development classes for African American males as well as restorative justice, which requires victims and offenders to talk about the behavior and ways to address it.
Community activists from the Black Organizing Project, Public Counsel and Californians for Justice, among others, applauded the school board vote, but said more was needed to address the needs of disadvantaged students in the district.
Gosh, I wonder just how many Caucasoids there are in the Oakland School District, vs the number of blacks?
Further, could it possibly be that a “disproportionate” number of blacks are suspended because a higher number of blacks actually misbehave?
All this does is reinforce to persons who don’t need this kind of reinforcement that there are no consequences to actions. This is the same school district that validated “Ebonics” in 1996.
The clear bigotry of low expectations.
From the BostonGlobe.com:
Tsarnaev sentenced to death
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was sentenced to death Friday for his role in the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, the terror attack on the finish line of the storied race that killed three people and injured more than 260 others.
Tsarnaev, 21, had been convicted last month in US District Court in Boston of 17 charges that carried the possibility of the death penalty.
Three people were killed and over 260 people were wounded when two pressure-cooker bombs exploded near the Boston Marathon finish line on April 15th of 2013.
Frankly, I’m surprised the death penalty was acquired.
The look of an obvious black female racist.
Online fury over Boston University professor’s tweets on race
by Katia Hetter
(CNN) Fury erupted this month over incoming Boston University sociology and African-American studies professor Saida Grundy’s tweets about white men, race and slavery.
College student Nick Pappas wrote about Grundy’s tweets on his website SoCawlege.com a week ago with the headline “Boston University assistant professor Saida Grundy attacks whites, makes false statements on Twitter.”
My; what did Grundy write?
Her personal Twitter account has since been made private, but the Boston Globe reported some of the tweets: “why is white america so reluctant to identify white college males as a problem population?” and “every MLK week i commit myself to not spending a dime in white-owned businesses. and every year i find it nearly impossible.”
Grundy called white males a “problem population.” Anyone besides me, now, thinking that Grundy would like to formulate the G word?
The tweets were first noticed by student Nick Pappas, who posted them on his website “SoCawlege.com” and questioned how Grundy could be able to teach a diverse classroom given the racial hostility in her tweets.
“You have to teach college aged white males eventually, no?… this seems like you are unqualified to grade their work as you clearly demonstrate some kind of special bias against them,” he wrote.
Good luck to any young Caucasoid male walking into a Grundy class — that is, if you’re sufficiently stupid to actually submit to walking into one of her classes. She would have absolutely nothing to teach you, frankly.
I go by the Reverse Rule, which is: if the roles were reversed, what would happen?
That is, if Grundy were a Caucasoid male, would his anti-black Tweets result in his actually getting hired by Boston U and, further, his free speech defended by Boston U?
Of course not.
Oh, but wait. We were just told yesterday by a white female UK privileged Goldsmiths University student that she can’t be racist or sexist because she is named Bahar Mustafa.
Good point. This black female chick can’t be racist either.
Isn’t it cool how Leftists can be all things to all people whenever necessary?