No, we don’t change the entire judicial process for one person

Posted on by

In 2012, during a counseling session with my wife during a difficult time in our marriage, I revealed that I had been subject to an incident in high school where I was attacked by an individual who had attempted to sexually assault me. I was at a party with another friend, I’m pretty sure, and another boy had pushed me down on the bed and tried to undress me. He’d said he wanted to have sex with me but I said no. We had been drinking. While he was grabbing for my crotch and forcing himself on me, he was kissing me and attempting to put his tongue in my mouth.

It was bad enough that I had been drinking. But I’m a Mormon and having any kind of sex outside of marriage and drinking were two of the biggest things you weren’t supposed to do. Ever. I tried to push away but he put his hand over my mouth and, well, I was really drunk. I couldn’t resist and, worse, when he was trying to turn me over, I thought he was going to suffocate me. Maybe kill me. One of his friends jumped on the bed and the three of us fell to the floor. I managed to get up and go into the bathroom. Then I managed to get out of the house.

I never told anyone up to 2012 because I was frightened. And I was really embarrassed. Here I was, a young boy, a Mormon, at someone else’s house, at a party, where there was drinking. I knew I shouldn’t have been in that situation in the first place. But I was a kid; I was 15. I couldn’t have told anyone. About the drinking. About the boy trying to forcibly have sex with me. I would have been in so much trouble. And it really affected me. It affected my relationships with women to the point that, in 2012, I need counseling to keep my marriage together. This happened in Utah. I ended up going all the way to Florida to escape it. It still weighs on my mind. I had betrayed my values, my church, my family, my friends. And I was almost anally raped. I know it. The whole thing was traumatic in the extreme. This was in 1982. I’m pretty sure.

Since that time, I’ve become a respected doctor. I’ve made something of myself despite what happened. I was able to get married. But now I see that boy, now a man, Sylvan Peratus, has been nominated to the US Supreme Court. He’s nothing but a reminder to me of that night. Now he’s all over the television.

It’s only fitting that the FBI investigate my claim. In fact, I demand it. I’m not exactly sure on the year. Probably 1982. Around there. Or the place. The house. Or the time. I’m not sure how I got to the party. I’m not sure how I got home. I was drunk. But I’m the victim here. I have some people who support me. Except now they’ve recanted. And I see that Peratus has a letter saying that 65 people support him. They’re all lying, obviously.

He represents everything that me, my family, my parents and my friends don’t believe in. My brother works for a law firm that supports work against Leftists, people I don’t like. I myself have worked for causes in order to ensure that Leftists don’t acquire political power of any kind. I worked against everything Obama tried to enact or pass.

Worse yet, Sylvan’s mother Hayley Peratus, while she was a judge, ruled against our family in a house foreclosure case in 1996. I never forgot that.

I wrote my local GOP representative about what happened, who then contacted one of my state’s GOP senators. I wanted to be anonymous. But now, somehow, something leaked and the media found me and so my name is out there. So is my allegation. I’ve retained an attorney and I took a polygraph back in August.

The GOP want me to testify against Peratus. My lawyer, who has worked for Judicial Watch and the ACLJ in the past, says that I simply need to be believed. I was almost anally raped. I know it. An allegation like mine is very serious and, after all, I’m the victim here. Not Peratus.

One Democrat Senator asked me: “If Mr BZ really did not want to come forward, never intended to come forward … why did he pay for a polygraph in August, and why did he hire a lawyer in August? And who paid for it?” Senator Feinstein asked.

This is clearly prejudicial. I’m the victim here. I may testify before the Judiciary Committee. I may not. I’m not sure yet. But they’re trying to pin me down, pin my testimony down, and that’s just not fair. I’m insisting that Peratus testify before I do. If I even testify at all. But no matter what, everyone needs to know what Peratus did to me.

Everyone simply needs to believe me. I say it, so it’s true. I’m the victim here. These dates the Judiciary Committee set in order to pin me down are completely arbitrary. What’s the rush? The November election really doesn’t mean anything. I need to be heard, on my schedule and by my terms. It should be my timetable and at my convenience. I’ve had 36 years to think about it. I just need some more time.

Need I remind you? I’m the victim here.

Would I inherently be believed by the American Media Maggots?

Women are clearly stronger, more resolute, dedicated, truthful, honest and possessed of leadership abilities than men.

Until they’re not, and wish — no, demand — to be protected like delicate, wilting flowers with little will or strength.

Am I sensing something of any number of mixed messages here?

Am I saying that’s what’s good for the goose is good for the gander? Clearly not. Situationally-dependent, women are more delicate and worthy of protection than Evil Men. Women cannot defend themselves. Men can. Uh, wait. Except that the current meme is that women are inherently stronger than men and inherently more believable than men.

Wait; that’s not exactly what’s being said either. What is being said?

“I believe her because I know she’s telling the truth.” That’s a sensible as saying the earth is flat or that the sun rises in the west because I’m convinced it’s accurate. It’s also an apparent embracing of Napoleonic Law where one is guilty until proven innocent.

In other words, being placed into a position where one must prove a negative. Good luck with that. Prove that you didn’t crash into my car in 1982 and drive away.

Yes. That is how silly it’s all gotten. Silly and, more importantly, damaging. Demorats resort — because it’s the only play that seems to work any more — to identity politics once again.

As of this writing, here is what we know.

Christine Blasey Ford has indicated she will testify on Thursday.

There are now three “witnesses” who have refuted Professor Ford’s allegations. Additionally, from Breitbart:

Nolte: Every Witness Named by Kavanaugh’s Accusers Sides with Kavanaugh

by John Nolte

The two women making sexual misconduct allegations against Brett Kavanaugh claim to have witnesses, but so far, all of their witnesses back Kavanaugh’s claim that nothing happened.

It might be difficult to remember this as Democrats and the media throw around phrases like “second accuser” and “attempted sexual assault” and “exposing himself” against the Supreme Court nominee. But the facts are still the facts, and every single witness named so far by both accusers say they witnessed nothing of the sort.

A second accuser has emerged. There is a continuing problem, however. From the DailyCaller.com:

THE NEW YORK TIMES WAS UNABLE TO CORROBORATE SECOND KAVANAUGH ACCUSER’S STORY

by Amber Athey

The New York Times reported on Sunday that it was unable to corroborate the claims of a second accuser who says Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh exposed himself to her in college.

Deborah Ramirez alleges that Kavanaugh thrust his penis into her face while she was drunk at a Yale University dormitory party. The New Yorker ran with Ramirez’s allegation on Sunday despite being unable to produce any firsthand witnesses or confirm that Kavanaugh was at the party where the incident was said to have occurred.

The New York Times noted several paragraphs deep in a report that it chose not to report on Ramirez’s allegation because of a lack of corroborating evidence.

But hell, why let the lack of facts stand in the way of slaughtering Judge Kavanaugh.

NYT also noted, “The New Yorker did not confirm with other eyewitnesses that Judge Kavanaugh was at the party.”

In an interview with CBS’ “This Morning” on Monday, Jane Mayer, a co-author on The New Yorker piece, admitted that they had no firsthand witnesses who could confirm Ramirez’s account.

Let me be abundantly clear: even the New York Times wouldn’t touch the story about allegations made by the second accuser. That in and of itself bespeaks volumes. To those who are actually paying attention.

The good news is this, from TheHill.com:

Kavanaugh: ‘I will not be intimidated into withdrawing’

by Jordain Carney

Brett Kavanaugh on Monday said he will “not be intimidated into withdrawing” from his Supreme Court nomination after a second woman came forward with a sexual misconduct allegation against him. 
Kavanaugh sent a letter on Monday to Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) — the chairman and ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, respectively — saying the accusations against him are “smears, pure and simple.” 
“They debase our public discourse. But they are also a threat to any man or woman who wishes to serve our country. Such grotesque and obvious character assassination—if allowed to succeed—will dissuade competent and good people of all political persuasions from service,” Kavanaugh said in the letter to Grassley and Feinstein.
“I will not be intimidated into withdrawing from this process. The coordinated effort to destroy my good name will not drive me out. The vile threats of violence against my family will not drive me out. The last-minute character assassination will not succeed,” Kavanaugh continued. 

Judiciary Committee Chairman Senator Chuck Grassley has been more than accomodating to Professor Ford. But NO, she should not testify second. She should testify first. This is one of the basic precepts of the entire judicial process. One person — male or female, it doesn’t matter — doesn’t get to hijack the entire judicial system.

Here’s what I believe after having worked in law enforcement for 41 years and also as a detective for a large department in Child Abuse and sex assaults (amongst many other assignments).

  • All victims should be afforded the opportunity to make claims and reports.
  • All victims should be afforded the opportunity to be heard but not to be believed absent corroboration in some significant fashion.
  • Women are no more inherently truthful or believable than men.
  • Facts lead an investigation where it needs to go. Not a single allegation taken in isolation. But a series of facts with supporting evidence taken in totality.
  • Due process is primary.

It has been a chaotic panoply of errors, shenanigans, stupidity and a purposefully backstabbing derailment strategy played out in public for political purposes by Demorats. Any pretense at bipartisanship, compromise or good will has resolutely ended on the part of the Demorats. “By any means necessary” is now the slogan of the Demorat Party and they will stop at nothing until they have GOP veins between their teeth and are in total control with restored power in DC. Nothing is too low, no tactic too obscene.

Senator Mitch McConnell is correct with this Tweet on Monday:

Democrats and their allies are trying to destroy a man’s personal and professional life on the basis of unsubstantiated and uncorroborated allegations. This is a smear campaign, pure and simple…aided and abetted by members of the United States Senate.

However, the GOP is still back at “gosh, what will people think of us?”

This is for all the marbles folks.

America is on the brink of truly destructive DC governmental bedlam.

And this ain’t playing.

BZ

 

 Share

Justice Antonin Scalia’s words: American exceptionalism

Posted on by

This is Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia (who passed away in 2016 at the age of 79), in a Senate Judiciary Hearing from 2011 regarding the role of judges under the US Constitution, and American exceptionalism.

I’m sorry, but listening to the great depth and breadth of this man’s understanding of the US Constitution brings tears to my eyes. As you watch the video note the thrall in which the audience is kept. They are in awe of being present in the same room as this man and the weight of his knowledge of history and his stellar intelligence. Can you imagine having had the honor and privilege of taking a class from Scalia?

We denigrate and dissolve the United States from within at our own peril and place, literally, the rest of the planet in jeopardy if for no other reason than Nature abhors a vacuum.

BZ

 

 Share

BZ’s Berserk Bobcat Saloon Radio Show, Thursday, 9-20-18, with guest ALLEN THOMAS

Posted on by

Featuring Right thinking from a left brain, doing the job the American Media Maggots won’t, embracing ubiquitous, sagacious perspicacity and broadcasting behind enemy lines in Occupied Fornicalia from the veritable Belly of the Beast, the Bill Mill in Sacramento, Fornicalia, I continue to proffer my thanks to the SHR Media Network for allowing me to utilize their studio and hijack their air twice weekly, Tuesdays and Thursdays, thanks to my shameless contract — as well as appear on the Sack Heads: Against Tyranny Show every Wednesday night.

Hours 1 & 2: BZ spoke to Sasquatch hunter, researcher and paranormal investigator ALLEN THOMAS, about the recent uptick in UFO, Sasquatch and unexplained activities — with a whole host of new sightings and occurrences in California and around the world. ALLEN has his own YouTube show called the SQUATCH ZONE. Click the link and check it out.

If you care to listen to the show in Spreaker, click on the yellow button at the upper left.

Listen to “BZ’s Berserk Bobcat Saloon Radio Show, Thursday, 9-20-18” on Spreaker.

If you care to watch the show on the SHR Media YouTube channel, click on the red start button below. We kindly ask you to SUBSCRIBE to the SHR Media channel. Please NOTE: For DISH subscribers: your Hopper has recently been wired to play YouTube videos. You can now toss ol’ BZ onto your massive flatscreen TV and watch him in all of his obese, biased and politically-egregious, lamentable goodness — for free!

Facebook has decided to play well with Spreaker again, so you can watch the show here on the SHR Facebook page. SHR has also associated itself with PERISCOPE and with Google Play.

Please join me, the Bloviating Zeppelin (on Twitter @BZep, Facebook as Biff Zeppe and the Bloviating Zeppelin, and on Gab.ai @BZep), every Tuesday and Thursday night on the SHR Media Network from 11 PM to 1 AM Eastern and 8 PM to 10 PM Pacific, at the Berserk Bobcat Saloon — where the speech is free but the drinks are not.

As ever, thank you so kindly for listening, commenting, and interacting in the chat room or listening later via podcast.

Please remember we only monitor the chat room at SHRMEDIA.COM — though there is chat available on both Facebook and YouTube. Come on over to the SHR chat room where you’ll meet great friends!

  • Want to listen to all the Berserk Bobcat Saloon archives on Spreaker? Go here.
  • Want to watch past shows on Periscope? Go here.
  • Want to watch past shows on the SHR Media Facebook page? Go here.
  • Want to watch past Berserk Bobcat Saloon shows on YouTube? Go here.

Thank you one and all for listening, watching and supporting the SHR Media Network: “Conservative Media Done Right.”

BZ

 

 Share

Democrats: two of YOUR men need to be investigated for sexual misconduct

Posted on by

We know that, according to the LDAMM — Leftists, Demorats and the American Media Maggots — Judge Brett Kavanaugh is nothing short of the Devil’s Spawn due to his alleged sexual misconduct 36 years ago whilst a high schooler.

A little tough to prove. But who cares? It’s all about the process of destruction.

However, much, much easier to prove are recent allegations of sexual misconduct involving two darker Demorat brethren, specifically Corey Booker, he of the googly eyes, and good Muslim Keith Ellison.

First, from DailyCaller.com:

IN COLLEGE COLUMN, CORY BOOKER REVEALED TIME HE GROPED FRIEND, AND SHE RESISTED

by Charles C. Johnson

Writing for his college paper, Cory Booker once admitted that he groped a friend when he was 15 years old.

Now the mayor of Newark and a candidate for New Jersey’s open Senate seat, a college-aged Booker described the experience of grabbing the girl’s breast and having his hand pushed away.

“Telling one’s own personal story is often the most powerful way to make a point, or, more importantly, to make people think,” Booker wrote in the February 19, 1992 column for the Stanford Daily, under the headline “So Much for Stealing Second.”

Stop. Let’s recognize this as what it is: a tacit admission of guilt gone so far as to have been printed boldly and cavalierly in black ink. Thinking, I suppose, that no one important is involved and, well, it’s only a little girl so “who cares,” right?

“New Year’s Eve 1984,” Booker recalled. “I will never forget. I was 15. As the ball dropped, I leaned over to hug a friend and she met me instead with an overwhelming kiss.”

Things apparently moved very quickly for the young man, who recalled thinking of sex as a “game.”

“As we fumbled upon the bed, I remember debating my next ‘move’ as if it were a chess game. With the ‘Top Gun’ slogan ringing in my head, I slowly reached for her breast. After having my hand pushed away once, I reached my ‘mark,’” Booker wrote.

Was the female victim awake and cognizant of what was happening? Apparently not.

“Our grouping ended soon and while no ‘relationship’ ensued, a friendship did,” he wrote. “You see, the next week in school she told me she was drunk that night and didn’t really know what she was doing.”

In my state, that’s called rape under PC 261(a)(4):

261.  (a) Rape is an act of sexual intercourse accomplished with a
person not the spouse of the perpetrator, under any of the following
circumstances:
(4) Where a person is at the time unconscious of the nature of the
act, and this is known to the accused.  As used in this paragraph,
"unconscious of the nature of the act" means incapable of resisting
because the victim meets one of the following conditions:
   (A) Was unconscious or asleep.
   (B) Was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant that the act
occurred.
   (C) Was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant of the
essential characteristics of the act due to the perpetrator's fraud
in fact.
   (D) Was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant of the
essential characteristics of the act due to the perpetrator's
fraudulent representation that the sexual penetration served a
professional purpose when it served no professional purpose.

This isn’t “theoretical” or therapy-derivative. It’s an admission by Booker of a series of events. Quite completely unlike the Kavanaugh situation.which, unless God magically intervenes, cannot be proven in any way, shape or form. Then:

Booker wrote about how alcohol lubricated those relations: “Another friend in high school counseled me on the importance of drinking,” he wrote, detailing the slogans he had heard from friends. Booker listed them: “‘With liquor you’ll get to bed quicker,’ … ‘What do you think happened? She invited me back to her room at 3 a.m.’ … ‘I’ve got to find a way to snatch that snatch.’ … ‘The best thing for that girl would be to be tied down and screwed.’”

Then there is the hypocrisy of Muslim Keith Ellison, who is alleged to have abused his girlfriend in a domestic violence situation. Karen Monahan posted her medical record detailing her injuries this past Wednesday.

Keith Ellison’s ex-girlfriend shares medical record detailing abuse allegation.
Karen Monahan posted the document on Twitter Wednesday.

by Adam Uren

Karen Monahan has released one of her medical records that shows she discussed the alleged domestic abuse by Rep. Keith Ellison with her doctor.

Ellison’s ex-girlfriend posted the document from Park Nicollet Clinic, dated November 28, 2017 on Twitter Wednesday.

It records that she had presented symptoms of anemia, and that she told her doctor “she was in a very stressful environment for years, emotional and physical abuse by a partner from whom she is now separated.”

It then goes on to say: “She identifies the individual she was involved with as congressman Ellison, and she is now worried about retribution if she identifies him publicly.”

But wait; I thought Demorats insist that every woman’s allegation of abuse should be believed.

As the document is dated last November, this is 9 months before Monahan went public with her allegation against Ellison, which happened a few days ahead of the Minnesota DFL primaries in August. This came after the alleged domestic abuse was initially revealed in a post by her son on Facebook.

Her son said Ellison had subjected her to “pure hell” during the two year relationship that end in 2016, with Monahan herself saying she was a victim of “narcissist abuse.”

She also says she has a 2-minute video showing Ellison physically and verbally abusing her, including pulling her off a bed by her feet. This footage has not been released, with Monahan saying she doesn’t intend to and that it’s packed up on a flash drive somewhere in storage.

It doesn’t end there, of course. The Demorats themselves have taken it upon themselves to accuse the victim in this case. From the DailyCaller.com:

WOMAN ACCUSING DNC CO-CHAIR OF ABUSE DESCRIBE HOW DEMOCRATS ‘SMEARED, THREATENED, ISOLATED’ HER

by Benny Johnson

DNC Deputy Chair and Minnesota Congressman Keith Ellison has been accused domestic abuse by former girlfriend Karen Monahan. Monahan broke her story earlier in the year, claiming to have video evidence of Ellison physically abusing her and using sexist slurs toward her.

Monahan has been slowly telling her story through Twitter, explaining how Democrats in her state attempted to silence her and “isolate” her. When a follower asked if Democrats believed her claims, Monahan said, “I’ve been smeared, threatened, isolated from my own party.”

Monahan alleges she provided medical records to back up her claims of abuse, but state Democrats did nothing: “I provided medical records from 2017, stating on two different Dr. Visits, I told them about the abuse and who did it. My therapist released records stating I have been dealing [with] and healing from the abuse.”

“I knew I wouldn’t be believed,” Monahan said of her Democratic colleagues.

Isn’t it odd how two males are accused, yet nothing happens to them? There is a difference, though. They are black, and they are Demorats. Aha. There’s your difference.

Demorats, you are what you embrace. And you continue to embrace serial rapists, misogynists, serial sexual harassers, gropers, semen-spreaders and all of their powerful female enablers.

Let’s be honest. Hillary Clinton put up with all of Bill’s serial sexual abuse because she was promised that, one day, should would hold the reins of presidential power. It was her “turn” in 2008 — only to have some fresh uppity black man interfere — and in 2016, only to have — OMG, even worse! — some guy with a dead orange cat on his head kick her fainting arse to the electoral and popular voting curb. But wait. It’s said that Hillary took the “popular vote” by two million. Uh, yeah. About that. A minimum of two million illegals from California and other states cast their ballots but, due to checks and balances, the Orange Guy won.

We’ll place credence in you, Demorats, when you start to clean up your own house.

Which you won’t.

BZ

 

 Share