Democrat Elizabeth Warren screws over female employees

It ever so pleases me to expose the hypocrisy splayed about by the Demorats, even when honest Americans are injured personally. It sucks to be you. Sometimes you have to be smarter than the propaganda. If you are not, well, there are prices to be paid. Commitments have consequences. Hey. So do elections.

From the WashingtonFreeBeacon.com:

Elizabeth Warren’s Female Staffers Made 71% of Male Staffers’ Salaries in 2016

by Brent Scher

Equal Pay Day Special: Warren demonstrates hypocrisy on gender pay gap

The gender pay gap in Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s (D., Mass.) office is nearly 10 percent wider than the national average, meaning women in the Massachusetts Democrat’s office will have to wait longer than most women across the country to recognize Equal Pay Day.

Equal Pay Day, created two decades ago by the National Committee on Pay Equity, is scheduled by using the Census Bureau annual unadjusted gender pay gap to determine how far into the next year women would have to work to match annual earnings of men. Last year’s figures, showing that women earned 79.6 percent of what men earned, put Equal Pay Day on Tuesday April 4, more than three months into the calendar year.

Equal pay for equal work. Equal pay for dangerous work? Take a gander.

Question: just how many womyn work in these jobs? The deadliest jobs? I would submit: merely a handful at most. Lots of womyn loggers. Lots of womyn roofers. Lots of general construction laborers. Why, just the other day, I saw a massive contingent of womyn slamming down shingles on a friend’s roof. Uh no. I didn’t. I was lying there.

The above jobs? They’re too foul for most womyn. They wouldn’t denigrate themselves thusly. Those are jobs best left for the — wait for it — male barbarians. Most womyn might break a nail, after all. Worse yet, two or more. Beneath them, it is.

(The word “womyn” is insisted upon by those females who don’t want to be associated by word with men. Hence the “y.” You see?)

Sorry. Facts.

However, women working for Warren were paid just 71 cents for every dollar paid to men during the 2016 fiscal year, according to a Washington Free Beacon analysis.

The median annual earnings for women staffers, $52,750, was more than $20,000 less than the median annual earnings for men, $73,750, according to the analysis of publicly available Senate data.

When calculated using average salaries rather than median, the pay gap expands to just over $26,051, or about 31 percent.

Consistent with previous Free Beacon analyses of Senate salary data, only full-time staffers who were employed for the entire period in question were included in the calculations.

For example, Warren’s former chief of staff Mindy Myers and her male replacement Dan Geldon were not included because neither worked the full year.

Among employees employed the entire year, only one woman, Warren’s director of scheduling, earned a six-figure salary, at $100,624.88.

Five men—Warren’s director of oversight and investigations ($156,000), legislative director ($149,458), deputy chief of staff ($119,375), Massachusetts state director ($152,310), and deputy state director ($113,750)—earned more than Warren’s highest paid woman staffer in 2016.

Whaaat? Leftist womyn screwing over fellow Leftist womyn? Zounds! This cannot be true. Except, well, yes, it is.

Many discount attributing gender pay differences to discrimination, arguing that these comparisons fail to take into account several contributing factors, but Warren is not one of them.
Warren said on last year’s Equal Pay Day that the American workplace was “rigged against women” and called it a “national day of embarrassment” for the nation.

“Today is Equal Pay Day, and by the sound of it, you would think it’s some sort of historic holiday commemorating the anniversary of a landmark day that our country guaranteed equal pay for women,” Warren said. “But that’s not what this is about. Not even close.”

“The game is rigged against women and families, and it has to stop,” Warren continued. “It is 2016, not 1916, and it’s long past time to eliminate gender discrimination in the workplace.”

Right. It’s rigged. By womyn. Against womyn. Just ask Elizabeth “Fauxcahontas” Warren. She’s in good company. Hillary Clinton also short-sheeted womyn.

Warren is far from the only politician who pays women less than men.

Most notable on the list is failed Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who paid women less than men first as a senator, then as secretary of state, and as a presidential candidate. Her campaign viewed her tendency to pay women less than men as a campaign vulnerability.

Former President Barack Obama regularly spoke out about the gender pay gap, but women working at the White House were paid less than men.

Also paying women less than men were Democratic Govs. Jon Bel Edwards (LA.), who last month held an “equal pay summit,” and Andrew Cuomo (N.Y.), who has signed two executive orders this year to eliminate the wage gap.

Warren’s office did not respond to inquiries from the Washington Free Beacon. Gobsmacked, I am. Moreover, let’s stay away from facts, shall we?

Nice video. But the poster clearly can’t spell.

The Spite House under our loving Barack Hussein Obama deigned to undercut the salaries for womyn doing the same jobs as men in the Spite House itself? Under its roof? The outrage! The betrayal!

Not just regular betrayal. Extra-crispy betrayal. From the WashingtonExaminer.com:

Obama White House still pays women less than men

by Ashe Schow

If activists are going to use median annual salaries to claim women are paid less than men, then they ought to be consistent and call out President Obama‘s White House.

Female staffers in the White House earn 89 cents for ever dollar that male staffers earn. That’s on par with one of the numbers often reported for the misleading “gender wage gap,” which finds women earning 77 or 78 or 89 cents to a man’s dollar.

American Enterprise Scholar Mark J. Perry, who analyzed the White House data, found the median salary for the White House’s 271 female staffers to be $68,658, while the median salary for the 198 male staffers was $76,928 in 2016.

I don’t know. To me that seems to fit the word “disparity.” But I could be wrong.

“Therefore, female staffers in the Obama White House currently earn 89.25% of the median salary for male staffers, or 89.25 cents for every $1 men earn, and there is a 10.75% gender pay gap at the Obama White House,” Perry wrote. “That pay gap is slightly smaller than the 15.8% gender pay gap at the White House last year, but is still more than 2.5 times greater than the average gender pay gap for the Washington, D.C., labor market of only 4% according to the most recent data available from the Department of Labor.”

You opened the door. Never think people will not walk through it, once opened.

BZ

P.S.

Here’s another tasty tidbit that womyn will only admit singly and alone, never in a group or in public: womyn hate working in an all-female environment at any given job. But of course that’s not PC to think, much less to write here.

 

Elizabeth Warren removed from Senate floor

From FoxNews.com:

Warren barred from speaking on Senate floor for rest of Sessions debate

by Samuel Chamberlain

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., was prohibited Tuesday night from speaking on the Senate floor for the rest of the debate over Sen. Jeff Sessions’ nomination to be attorney general.

The drama began when Warren, quoting a 30-year-old letter by civil rights leader Coretta Scott King, referred to the Alabama Republican as a “disgrace.” King’s letter was written in 1986, when Sessions was nominated to the federal bench but was never confirmed. 

King, the widow of Martin Luther King Jr., also wrote that when acting as a federal prosecutor, Sessions used his power to “chill the free exercise of the vote by black citizens.”

Warren’s reference drew the ire of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., who said that Warren had “impugned the motives of our colleague from Alabama.”

The truth? Senator Jeff Sessions has sponsored and supported legislation attacking racism. That matters not to Warren.

Sen. Steve Daines, R-Mont. advised Warren that she was out of order under Rule XIX of the Senate, which states that “no Senator in debate shall, directly or indirectly, by any form of words impute to another Senator or to other Senators any conduct or motive unworthy or unbecoming a Senator.”

After a few parliamentary moves, McConnell called for a vote to affirm Daines’ ruling that Warren was out of order. The GOP-controlled Senate backed him up, 49-43, before defeating a Democratic effort to restore Warren’s speaking privileges, 50-43.

“She was warned, she was given an explanation,” McConnell said of Warren. “Nevertheless, she persisted.”

Senator Fauxcahontas said:

“To put Senator Sessions in charge of the Department of Justice is an insult to African-Americans.”

With no proof of his alleged “racism.” An accusation is as good as a nod to a blind horse.

The Senate backed its majority leader. By a party line vote of 49-43, it found Warren in violation of Senate rules. She is now barred from speaking on the subject of the Sessions nomination.

That is called “harnessing power,” Republicans, and actually learning how to wield it — something with which you are entirely unfamiliar.

What you won’t hear or see on other forms of media is this: Marco Rubio’s address with regard to Elizabeth Warren.

“Elections have consequences,” said Barack Hussein Obama. And with that he and other Demorats proceeded to rub the noses of DC Republicans into the political shite. You should expect no less in return, Demorats.

That said, some people suggest the GOP has made a martyr out of Fauxcahontas.

I say: she has been made to revisit her political vulnerability.

BZ

 

The Elizabeth Warren Leftist song:

It doesn’t get any more Leftist and ridiculous than that.  Equally easy to beat as Shrillary Clinton who, by the way, is not a “shoo-in.”

But still some good clean Leftist Insanity Fun.

BZ