Tag Archives: women

Please: free the shackled tampon!

Posted on by

Not only should tampons be in women’s restrooms, they should be in men’s restrooms as well. Just ask all the SJWs by which this is becoming a movement. Get it? Movement? A movement in a restroom?

From Chronicle.com:

Tampons in Men’s Rooms? It’s Just a Small Part of ‘Menstrual Equity,’ Campus Activists Say

by Alex Arriaga

Over the past year, several colleges have improved access to menstrual products on their campuses, including in some men’s and gender-neutral restrooms. That last detail has prompted some conservative websites to take note.

The American Conservative mockingly headlined its report “Social Justice Washrooms,” from “tomorrow’s generation of American elites.” Commenters on Breitbart’s report on the trend called it “academic insanity,” pointing out that “men do not menstruate.”

Pointing out the obvious is insensitive and thuggish, though. Just ask any Social Justice Warrior on campus because, after all, no campus can cramp us.

But campus leaders say stocking all bathrooms with such products is a relatively easy way to make sure no one is left out. The University of Wisconsin at Madison, the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, and Brown University are a few other institutions that provide free menstrual products in some men’s and gender-neutral restrooms, in order to be more inclusive of transgender students.

I know. I have a great idea. Let’s all get butt-hurt and knicker-twisted over this silly Emo issue. Gallup polls, not known to inherently skew right, indicate that 3.8% of the US self-identifies as LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ. Or whatever. As opposed to the roughly 23% estimate offered by general public thought because of the wonderful marketing job done by the American Media Maggots, Hollywood and self-promoting entertainment in general.

Further, NPR.org indicates that 0.6% of Americans identify as transgender.

We as a nation are bending over and getting bent over by a minority of a minority.

So excuse me if I larf at you silly Emo bastards and bastardettes when you write a paragraph like this one.

Part of the growing “free the tampon” movement has been an effort to make college more fair for students who menstruate, a concept for which Jennifer Weiss-Wolf coined the phrase “menstrual equity.”

Right. Which is apparently why men who don’t menstruate are paying for the tampons of women who do — and paying for the birth control of women who also wish their gender-assured Free Cheese.

Are these Social Justice Warriors going to pay for the prostate exams, checkups, and vasectomies of men? Because men, after all, are stricken with prostate cancer at almost the same rate of breast cancer in women.

Of course.

I didn’t think so either.

BZ

P.S.

I have a question. If you menstruate, physically requiring a tampon — unless you don’t mind walking around in bloody shorts and pants then sitting on cloth-covered chairs in public areas — and you identify as a man that day, is it unfair to expect, because you identify as a man, that people must provide you with tampons the likes of which you deny because, after all, you mentally insist you are male?

Just asking.

 

 Share

Fauxcahontas and Google: in good company abusing women

Posted on by

I already wrote about Fauxcahontas, Demorat Senator Elizabeth Warren, screwing over her female staff members by paying them 71% of what an equivalent male staff member makes on the dollar.

As per normal with Demorats, it’s all about “do as I say and not as I do.” 

Now, we have Google tugging on Warren’s coattails.

From the WSJ.com:

Google Pays Female Workers Less Than Male Counterparts, Labor Department Says

by Jack Nicas

Department’s claims don’t amount to formal charges; investigation is ongoing

An investigation of Google Inc. has found it systematically pays female employees less than their male counterparts, U.S. Department of Labor officials said, a claim that adds to allegations of gender bias in Silicon Valley.

The Labor Department found the gender-pay gap during a routine probe into whether Google, a federal contractor, is complying with laws that prohibit contractors from discriminating against applicants or employees.

Crushed, I am, to learn that Google is so craven.

What is the motto of Google? “Don’t be evil.”

How can one not be evil — against all Leftist and Demorat philosophies — by conspicuously displaying rampant hypocrisy in the face of demanded equality? This is a fundamental platform on which Demorats and Leftists stand mightily. Or. Maybe they only say they do.

The tech industry has been under fire for years over the large percentage of white and Asian male employees and executives. Tech firms have started initiatives to try to combat the trend, but few have shown much progress.

Stop. Those Evil Caucasoids. Those Evil Asians. For daring to be interested in technology and tech issues more so than, say, females, black gangbangers, illegal Mexicans or crazed Albanian dwarves.

Point made.

BZ

P.S.

Are women inherently paid less than men overall, absent specific life circumstances? Let’s watch and listen.

 

 Share

Democrat Elizabeth Warren screws over female employees

Posted on by

It ever so pleases me to expose the hypocrisy splayed about by the Demorats, even when honest Americans are injured personally. It sucks to be you. Sometimes you have to be smarter than the propaganda. If you are not, well, there are prices to be paid. Commitments have consequences. Hey. So do elections.

From the WashingtonFreeBeacon.com:

Elizabeth Warren’s Female Staffers Made 71% of Male Staffers’ Salaries in 2016

by Brent Scher

Equal Pay Day Special: Warren demonstrates hypocrisy on gender pay gap

The gender pay gap in Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s (D., Mass.) office is nearly 10 percent wider than the national average, meaning women in the Massachusetts Democrat’s office will have to wait longer than most women across the country to recognize Equal Pay Day.

Equal Pay Day, created two decades ago by the National Committee on Pay Equity, is scheduled by using the Census Bureau annual unadjusted gender pay gap to determine how far into the next year women would have to work to match annual earnings of men. Last year’s figures, showing that women earned 79.6 percent of what men earned, put Equal Pay Day on Tuesday April 4, more than three months into the calendar year.

Equal pay for equal work. Equal pay for dangerous work? Take a gander.

Question: just how many womyn work in these jobs? The deadliest jobs? I would submit: merely a handful at most. Lots of womyn loggers. Lots of womyn roofers. Lots of general construction laborers. Why, just the other day, I saw a massive contingent of womyn slamming down shingles on a friend’s roof. Uh no. I didn’t. I was lying there.

The above jobs? They’re too foul for most womyn. They wouldn’t denigrate themselves thusly. Those are jobs best left for the — wait for it — male barbarians. Most womyn might break a nail, after all. Worse yet, two or more. Beneath them, it is.

(The word “womyn” is insisted upon by those females who don’t want to be associated by word with men. Hence the “y.” You see?)

Sorry. Facts.

However, women working for Warren were paid just 71 cents for every dollar paid to men during the 2016 fiscal year, according to a Washington Free Beacon analysis.

The median annual earnings for women staffers, $52,750, was more than $20,000 less than the median annual earnings for men, $73,750, according to the analysis of publicly available Senate data.

When calculated using average salaries rather than median, the pay gap expands to just over $26,051, or about 31 percent.

Consistent with previous Free Beacon analyses of Senate salary data, only full-time staffers who were employed for the entire period in question were included in the calculations.

For example, Warren’s former chief of staff Mindy Myers and her male replacement Dan Geldon were not included because neither worked the full year.

Among employees employed the entire year, only one woman, Warren’s director of scheduling, earned a six-figure salary, at $100,624.88.

Five men—Warren’s director of oversight and investigations ($156,000), legislative director ($149,458), deputy chief of staff ($119,375), Massachusetts state director ($152,310), and deputy state director ($113,750)—earned more than Warren’s highest paid woman staffer in 2016.

Whaaat? Leftist womyn screwing over fellow Leftist womyn? Zounds! This cannot be true. Except, well, yes, it is.

Many discount attributing gender pay differences to discrimination, arguing that these comparisons fail to take into account several contributing factors, but Warren is not one of them.
Warren said on last year’s Equal Pay Day that the American workplace was “rigged against women” and called it a “national day of embarrassment” for the nation.

“Today is Equal Pay Day, and by the sound of it, you would think it’s some sort of historic holiday commemorating the anniversary of a landmark day that our country guaranteed equal pay for women,” Warren said. “But that’s not what this is about. Not even close.”

“The game is rigged against women and families, and it has to stop,” Warren continued. “It is 2016, not 1916, and it’s long past time to eliminate gender discrimination in the workplace.”

Right. It’s rigged. By womyn. Against womyn. Just ask Elizabeth “Fauxcahontas” Warren. She’s in good company. Hillary Clinton also short-sheeted womyn.

Warren is far from the only politician who pays women less than men.

Most notable on the list is failed Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who paid women less than men first as a senator, then as secretary of state, and as a presidential candidate. Her campaign viewed her tendency to pay women less than men as a campaign vulnerability.

Former President Barack Obama regularly spoke out about the gender pay gap, but women working at the White House were paid less than men.

Also paying women less than men were Democratic Govs. Jon Bel Edwards (LA.), who last month held an “equal pay summit,” and Andrew Cuomo (N.Y.), who has signed two executive orders this year to eliminate the wage gap.

Warren’s office did not respond to inquiries from the Washington Free Beacon. Gobsmacked, I am. Moreover, let’s stay away from facts, shall we?

Nice video. But the poster clearly can’t spell.

The Spite House under our loving Barack Hussein Obama deigned to undercut the salaries for womyn doing the same jobs as men in the Spite House itself? Under its roof? The outrage! The betrayal!

Not just regular betrayal. Extra-crispy betrayal. From the WashingtonExaminer.com:

Obama White House still pays women less than men

by Ashe Schow

If activists are going to use median annual salaries to claim women are paid less than men, then they ought to be consistent and call out President Obama‘s White House.

Female staffers in the White House earn 89 cents for ever dollar that male staffers earn. That’s on par with one of the numbers often reported for the misleading “gender wage gap,” which finds women earning 77 or 78 or 89 cents to a man’s dollar.

American Enterprise Scholar Mark J. Perry, who analyzed the White House data, found the median salary for the White House’s 271 female staffers to be $68,658, while the median salary for the 198 male staffers was $76,928 in 2016.

I don’t know. To me that seems to fit the word “disparity.” But I could be wrong.

“Therefore, female staffers in the Obama White House currently earn 89.25% of the median salary for male staffers, or 89.25 cents for every $1 men earn, and there is a 10.75% gender pay gap at the Obama White House,” Perry wrote. “That pay gap is slightly smaller than the 15.8% gender pay gap at the White House last year, but is still more than 2.5 times greater than the average gender pay gap for the Washington, D.C., labor market of only 4% according to the most recent data available from the Department of Labor.”

You opened the door. Never think people will not walk through it, once opened.

BZ

P.S.

Here’s another tasty tidbit that womyn will only admit singly and alone, never in a group or in public: womyn hate working in an all-female environment at any given job. But of course that’s not PC to think, much less to write here.

 

 Share