Oil: the difference between Clinton & Trump

TRUMP CATFrom MarketWatch.com:

Difference between Trump and Clinton as president: One million barrels of oil a day

by Sara Sjolin

U.S. oil production is bound for a significant shake up after the presidential election in November, says a senior editor at energy-information provider Platts.

“This election is going to have a major impact on the direction of U.S. and, possibly, global oil supply. Maybe the most significant impact of any election in U.S. history,” said Brian Scheid, senior oil editor at Platts, at the Platts Crude Oil Summit in London on Tuesday.

Looking at a worst case/best case scenario worked out between several analysts in Washington, he estimated that with a Republican win, U.S. oil production could jump by as much as 500,000 barrels a day. If the Democrats win, there could be a decline of 500,000 barrels a day, Scheid said.

I’ll say this again for those of you may just have tuned in.

I am not a Trump guy.  I was a Ted Cruz guy.

But when Hillary is the opponent, I’ll go with anyone who essentially isn’t Hillary.  And though it will make the enamel fleck off my teeth to do so, I will vote for Donald Trump.  This may be another reason.

BZ

 

Hillary wins West Virginia tonight, right? Wrong. Oh no!

Watch this.

Because “we’re gonna put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business.”

We already know what Mr Obaka thinks of the coal industry.  Like Khrushchev, he will bury them.

Then Hillary drove into coal country today.

So: does Hillary beat Bernie in West Virginia?

Uh, no.

BZ

 

SPOC: a “Shady Person Of Color” speaks out against “safe spaces” on college campus

SPOC 2That can get you potentially expelled from college, if you are a student.  It can wreak havoc on your social media accounts and attract Leftist Maggots like flies on shite.

It can certainly get you body slammed by your fellow college peers because you don’t pull the line that all the mooing brainless student cows believe their wilting-flower sensitivities trump surrounding reality.

Hanna Oh is now a SPOC — a “Shady Person Of Color” according to Claremont McKenna College’s school newspaper — for suggesting as editor of that paper in November of 2015 that “safe spaces” have no place on college campuses.

She partially wrote (see the complete article):

To our fellow Claremont students, we are disappointed in you as well.

We are disappointed in the fact that your movement has successfully managed to convince its members that anyone who dissents does so not for intelligent reasons, but due to moral failure or maliciousness.

We are disappointed that you’ve used phrases like “silence is violence” to not only demonize those who oppose you, but all who are not actively supporting you.

We are most disappointed, however, in the rhetoric surrounding “safe spaces.”

College is the last place that should be a safe space. We come here to learn about views that differ from our own, and if we aren’t made to feel uncomfortable by these ideas, then perhaps we aren’t venturing far enough outside of our comfort zone.

We would be doing ourselves a disservice to ignore viewpoints solely on the grounds that they may make us uncomfortable, and we would not be preparing ourselves to cope well with adversity in the future.

Dealing with ideas that make us uncomfortable is an important part of growing as students and as people, and your ideas will inhibit opportunities for that growth.

The problem is that Oh has dared to expose the truth about college’s little dainty darlings across the nation.

But when you control college campus ranguage as Leftists do, you can write anything you want about someone “of color” if they don’t pull their own “color weight.”

Like Hannah Oh.  Who betrayed her college values by spilling the Leftist beans that not only did students demand a “safe space” on campus — but via a private Google document — wanted a sound system, kitchenware, and a “board of SPOCs” that they wished to post on the wall in their “safe space.”  Not a board as in a council, but a board that would reveal those persons they believed were no longer worthy of their swarthiness.

Claremont then reacted as predicted by firing people and creating a temporary “safe space” whilst working on a permanent one.  Was there an administrative reaction to the concept of “SPOC” on their campus? — which is a demeaning term to persons of color — no.  There was no reaction by the Claremont administration.  As you would expect.

But as Oh revealed, here’s the practical kicker: no Caucasoids allowed.  They can’t enter the so-called “safe space.”  In the real world this is termed segregation.  Even Obama spoke out against “safe spaces.”

Oh revealed this — the treachery of it all! — when she again went against the Leftist grain and had the temerity to expose the situation on Fox News with Greta Van Susteren this very week.  The nerve of that SPOC!

As she and the editors dared to summarize in a published editorial:

Lastly, we are disappointed in students like ourselves, who were scared into silence.

We are not racist for having different opinions.

We are not immoral because we don’t buy the flawed rhetoric of a spiteful movement.

We are not evil because we don’t want this movement to tear across our campuses completely unchecked.

We are no longer afraid to be voices of dissent.

That is what scares Leftists.  That there would be any pushback at all That people would not automatically accept as rote what Leftists demand.  This cannot be.

Is pushback actually beginning?

BZ

 

Leftists suppress TRUTH and SPEECH

Freedom of Speech StoppedEverybody loves Facebook.  Wired.com’s Julia Greenberg says that “Facebook is killing it” whilst Twitter, Apple and Google are having tougher times.

Where Facebook apparently makes up the difference is in mobile ads.  Mobile advertising makes up 82% of Facebook’s total revenue.

Good to know, because Mark Zuckerberg is using this cash in order to suppress the truth and free speech.  Yes, your free speech, Millennials and Leftists.

And you’re just fine with that, you gibbering sycophant morons.  Good to know that if you click on a Facebook ad, or you even have Facebook, you’re contributing to the suppression of conservative speech, thought, even news.

From Gizmodo.com:

Former Facebook Workers: We Routinely Suppressed Conservative News

by Michael Nunez

Facebook workers routinely suppressed news stories of interest to conservative readers from the social network’s influential “trending” news section, according to a former journalist who worked on the project. This individual says that workers prevented stories about the right-wing CPAC gathering, Mitt Romney, Rand Paul, and other conservative topics from appearing in the highly-influential section, even though they were organically trending among the site’s users.

Of course, those of us on the right realize that Leftists consistently not only twist language, re-write language for purposes of control, but continuously quell the First Amendment for their purposes.  The ends of repression justify the means in their minds.  Just as Walter Williams asked:

“Are we headed towards more liberty, or are we headed towards more government control over our lives?”

We know the answer.

Fear.  Anyone remotely “conservative” who managed to squeak through at Facebook lived in fear of their jobs.

“Depending on who was on shift, things would be blacklisted or trending,” said the former curator. This individual asked to remain anonymous, citing fear of retribution from the company. The former curator is politically conservative, one of a very small handful of curators with such views on the trending team. “I’d come on shift and I’d discover that CPAC or Mitt Romney or Glenn Beck or popular conservative topics wouldn’t be trending because either the curator didn’t recognize the news topic or it was like they had a bias against Ted Cruz.”

It was a “chilling effect” on conservative news.

The former curator was so troubled by the omissions that they kept a running log of them at the time; this individual provided the notes to Gizmodo. Among the deep-sixed or suppressed topics on the list: former IRS official Lois Lerner, who was accused by Republicans of inappropriately scrutinizing conservative groups; Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker; popular conservative news aggregator the Drudge Report; Chris Kyle, the former Navy SEAL who was murdered in 2013; and former Fox News contributor Steven Crowder. “I believe it had a chilling effect on conservative news,” the former curator said.

Blocking the Drudge Report — which is nothing more than an aggregator of news and doesn’t really even write stories.  Simultaneously PROMOTING Black Lives Matter.

Think about this a bit as you jump on Facebook — and stay the hell off its ads.  You’re only contributing to your own demise if you have any conservative values whatsoever.

BZ

 

Per Walter Williams: totalitarianism?

GOVERNMENT BIG ENOUGH

A note I found scrawled inside the cab of a Union Pacific locomotive.  Truism.

From the DailySignal.com:

“Are we headed towards more liberty, or are we headed towards more government control over our lives?”

Whether you are a Conservative or a Leftist, you inherently know the answer to that question.

You answer is shaded, however, by your belief that government can free you, or squash you like a bug.

BZ