US surrenders internet control for NO purpose

obama-internet-icannAnd the crunch day is today.

From Yahoo.com:

US prepares to cede key role for internet

by Rob Lever

Washington (AFP) – The US government is set to cut the final thread of its oversight of the internet, yielding a largely symbolic but nevertheless significant role over the online address system.

Barring any last-minute glitches, the transition will occur at midnight Friday (0400 GMT Saturday), when the US contract expires for the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, which manages the internet’s so-called “root zone.”

When the agreement with the US Commerce Department runs out, ICANN will become a self-regulating non-profit international entity managing the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority, the system for online “domains” such as .com.

US and ICANN officials say the change is part of a longstanding plan to “privatize” those functions, but some critics complain about a “giveaway” that could threaten the internet’s integrity.

That’s putting it mildly.

Let’s listen to Senator Ted Cruz:

Then, let’s watch Senator Ted Cruz with ICANN CEO and President Goran Marby regarding ICANN in the Judiciary Subcommittee:

Is it just me, or does Mr Marby veritably reek of dripping condescension, equivocation, superiority and aloofness? Yes. It’s just me.

To whom are we ceding, essentially, control of the internet? From Breitbart.com:

Meet the New Authoritarian Masters of the Internet

by John Hayward

President Barack Obama’s drive to hand off control of Internet domains to a foreign multi-national operation will give some very unpleasant regimes equal say over the future of online speech and commerce.

Let the massive significance of that paragraph roil around in the fetid recesses of your brainulus for a bit.

Equal. Say.

I wonder: what other nation possesses a First Amendment? Oh. That’s right: no other.

In fact, they are likely to have much more influence than America, because they will collectively push hard for a more tightly controlled Internet, and they are known for aggressively using political and economic pressure to get what they want.

Consider: Russia, China, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Turkey — all countries that have either already censored, taken down or negatively impacted the internet on numerous occasions. To them, uncensored speech is a danger and not a core freedom.

The rest of the world, taken in total, is very interested in suppressing various forms of expression, for reasons ranging from security to political stability and religion. Those governments will never be comfortable, so long as parts of the Internet remain outside of their control. They have censorship demands they consider very reasonable, and absolutely vital. The website you are reading right now violates every single one of them, on a regular basis.

As does my blog. There are already persons in the United States who believe I should not be able to write what I write here. That I should need a “license to blog” and that I and others should be forced to operate under the former FCC “fairness doctrine” which had no fairness attached whatsoever. If you wish to take down my blog you’ll certainly not care for my upcoming radio show on SHR Media.

As my headline indicates, the US under Barack Hussein Obama has determined to surrender control of ICANN and turn it over to a conglomeration of interests that have a history of little or no interest in free speech.

That begs the question: why? Why, indeed. This is another in a continuing series of capitulist, surrender-monkey moves where the United States, under Obama, manages to give away power and control under the guise of “negotiation” for little if anything in return; witness Guantanamo, witness Bergdahl, witness Iran.

For the answer we must, in my opinion, hearken back to Obama’s formative years under, literally, Communists (“Communism is not love.  Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy.” -Mao), Muslims and Socialists. Mr Obama was taught that America’s “colonialist ways” have damaged the entire planet and, for that, we must atone.

This country, the United States of America, shames Mr Barack Hussein Obama. There is little, in his mind, of which to be proud. Hence, his endless hammering on the various wedges that divide our country. Mr Obama has become and is the Divider-In-Chief.

From Obama’s spiritual advisor Pastor Jeremiah Wright, to his mentor (and co-author) Bill Ayers, to his idols Saul Alinsky, Richard Clower, Frances Fox Piven, Che Guevara and more.

Atonement, you see, now comes in the form of Mr Obama purposefully attempting to minimize the role America plays around the globe — leading from behind, if you will. He believes you are lazy. On this one I must agree, but with the appellation applied to those generational parasites sucking Free Cheese from my American Taxpayer vein. Odd, coming from a person who has built nothing in his life, managed not one payroll or even started a lemonade stand.

Obama is weakening our defenses. He is weakening the defenses of our allies. Mr Obama is dismissed as a buffoon by our enemies, Russia, China, North Korea, much of the Middle East, because they realize he is a true Paper Tiger and means little of what he says, particularly at this juncture. He emboldens our enemies and undermines our allies.

It is no shock, therefore, that he continues in the fine capitulist tradition he began in 2008.

To the most free internet you’ll see in this lifetime, wave “buh-bye.”

There are no existential threats” to the US today, Mr Obama says.

Except himself.

BZ

 

July 4th, 2016



July 4th 1776Do you recognize your country any more?

Thank God there are still men and women who support the US Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the belief in freedom.

Ladies and gentlemen, we are on the precipice of a yawning chasm where, should we fall in, I wonder if we can ever be extricated.

American freedom, I believe, is in jeopardy.

We must not allow this country to fall.

BZ

Ronald Reagan July 4th

“13 Hours” – the CIA LIES for Clinton & Obama

13 HOURS MovieThe Michael Bay film, “13 Hours,” based on the book “13 Hours: The Inside Account of What Really Happened in Benghazi” by Mitchell Zuckoff, opened last month on January 15th and, unfortunately, I hadn’t been able to see the movie because I am not yet sufficiently mobile from my surgery.

I was able to see it late last night, Saturday, at the very final showing at a local theatre.  With the assistance of my Wifely Wife and her sister, the knee scooter was loaded into the Kraut Kar and off we went.

Essentially, the film and the book make liars and fools out of Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton.

The team’s CIA station chief told the Washington Post the stand-down order “is fiction and the film is flat-out wrong.”  Further, the CIA says that the film is “shameful and a distortion of the events and people who served in Benghazi that night.”

Juan Williams also believes the film and the book are fabrications.

What is sad is that American journalists yuck it up over the deaths of four Americans in Libya.  Somehow Ambassador Christopher Stevens, Officer Sean Smith and former SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods get forgotten.  [Watergate brought down a presidency where no one was killed.  Contrast and compare this to Benghazi, and its lies then and now.]

Benghazi A Phony ScandalWhen I wrote this post initially a few weeks ago, three of the actual operators who responded to the Benghazi call for assistance, Kristian “Tanto” Paronto, John “Tig” Tiegen, and Mark “Oz” Geist were interviewed on the Megyn Kelly show.  They unequivocally stated that they were told to stand down by CIA representatives.

These GRS (Global Response Services) employees, former soldiers and private security contractors hired as security elements, provided protection in austere and high-threat environments for the Central Intelligence Agency.

“This is the true story you were never told.”

Part of what you didn’t know is that the six GRS contractors were at the CIA annex, less than a mile from the Benghazi consulate.  You saw that clearly illustrated in the film “13 Hours.”  They could hear the distress calls over the radio.  The CIA station chief at that annex told the GRS contractors repeatedly to “stand down.”

Benghazi Consulate & AnnexAll three operators interviewed on The Kelly File specifically remembered the CIA station chief pointedly telling them, to their faces, to “stand down.”  A deputy chief, chief of base and a team leader saying “stand down.”

“If you guys don’t get over here, we’re all gonna fucking die,” radioed the State Department people at the Benghazi, Libya consulate to anyone who was listening.

The contractors decided to “buck orders and we left.”

All the operators testified to this in DC.

Do the operators believe the men who died would be alive today if the US had responded appropriately from the beginning?  They expected assistance from the US government that never came.  Why do they think four Americans paid the ultimate price?

First, they were looking for air support.  Instead, an unmanned drone was sent.  And the drone footage was useless because it was 30 seconds behind what was occurring in real time on the ground.  Do you remember the issue regarding staffers watching the drone over Benghazi as the assault occurred?

Benghazi Watched Them DieALL of the operators believe everyone would be alive today had they been allowed to respond when they were asked.  Unequivocally.  They all said it in front of Megyn Kelly.

When told the CIA response was they were never told to stand down, the operators said “that’s just silly.”  “Somehow they don’t want to believe that we were told to stand down.  They believe everything else.”

Megyn Kelly asked: “Do you have a political motive?”

They said the politics is what prompted them to go public.  The lies and the disinformation and the obfuscation.

Was it about a video?  And who is lying?  Hillary Clinton says “it’s not me.”  Meaning the operators were lying and the surviving family members are lying.

Hillary Clinton is denying once again that she told family members of Benghazi attack victims that a video was to blame for the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks — leaving only the possibility that the families are either lying or grossly mistaken about what the then-secretary of state told them in private.

The family members have publicly disputed Clinton’s claims, saying that the then-secretary of state explicitly blamed the film that day and said that she would go after the maker of the film, which many Muslims considered offensive.

Hillary Clinton blamed the non-existent “protests” and consulate attack on a ridiculous internet video.  This was wrong but Hillary Clinton went there anyway, in her official statement.

Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet.

Susan Rice carried the absurdist video meme to all the Sunday news shows following the Tuesday 9-11-2012 attack. Judicial Watch discovered:

A newly released email collected by Judicial Watch in response to a FOIA request shows the White House pushed Ambassador Susan Rice to promote the idea that an internet video mocking Islam, not President Obama’s foreign policy, was responsible for attacks in the Middle East, including the one in Benghazi.

Despite the fact that Hillary Clinton already knew the attack had nothing to do with a video.

“I believe to this day the video played a role.”

Obama and Jay Carney blamed the Benghazi attack on a poorly-produced video.  Obama knew this was false.

Clinton’s official statement was belied by an email she sent to her daughter the night of September 11th and a phone call she made to the Egyptian prime minister, where she said the attack was perpetrated by al Qaeda.

Hillary Clinton Email to Chelsea Re Benghazi AttackDiane Reynolds, by the way, is an alias for daughter Chelsea.

This was a naked attempt by the administration to make Americans feel guilty about their concerns involving Muslims.  A distraction built upon American guilt.

Hillary Clinton made her first statements already knowing there were no protests and that the video had nothing to do with the assault.

We are going to have the filmmaker arrested who was responsible for the death of your son.”

That filmmaker was Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, creator of “The Innocence of Muslims.”  He spent time in prison because of Obama and Clinton’s false accusations, on a parole violation.

“Someone is lying here, Mrs Clinton; who is it?”

Hillary Clinton: “not me.”

Further, she was fully on board with hanging the blame for the shabby video “The Innocence of Muslims”

Megyn Kelly: “How true to life is the film?”

Paronto: “It brought home a lot of the truths that we went through.  I’d go back there in a heartbeat.”

We think that perhaps someone like an Ed Gein or a John Wayne Gacy or a Richard Daumer or a Hannibal Lecter is a sociopath?

I submit that Hillary Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama are both damaging, violent psychopaths.  Sociopaths.  They both have American blood on their hands.

And why?  This?

And this?

The American Media Maggots have done their level best to minimize and denigrate the validity of this movie which means, by extension, the AMM mean to minimize and denigrate the sacrifices of our Sheepdogs. In order to protect their Leftist Masters.

All for political ends.

Meaning: in the true end, those four men who died in Benghazi were nothing more than little chess pieces moved about the ObamaLand board during his eight year attempt to kick America in the slats.

I am so glad I was able to see the film before it left theaters.

Every American should see the film if for no other reason than to realize that, yes, American is truly exceptional and, yes, there is true domestic evil in the world.

BZ

P.S.

Finally: would you like to help our special operators like SEALs, Delta, Green Berets and the like?  Go to ShadowWarriorsProject.org, started by “Oz” and please donate.

 

Obama’s goal now and in 2015: pushing America into decline?

Obama Striding Towards PodiumCharles Krauthammer, a very measured man whom I admire, believes so:

Mr Krauthammer is precisely correct; Mr Obama is a man, as president, who purposely chooses “America in decline.”  America’s enemies are emboldened, Obama is “concerned,” he “monitors,” and has done roughly nothing to hold America in the good light that he swore would return to our nation under his leadership.  We are not respected internationally as he said we would be under his tenure.

Further, we have natural gas and oil reserves that can potentially rid the nation of its festering relationship with the Islamic Middle East.  We have the capability to rid ourselves of a great deal of Blood or Conflict Oil.

Yet Mr Obama decides we shall not pursue independence.  Instead, he chooses social divisiveness over unity and coherence, class and racial warfare over cohesiveness and singularity of national purpose.

As Mr Krauthammer states, Obama is a man who does not believe in American exceptionalism or American goodness.  He seeks to place us completely in line with every other nation, no better than Cuba or Luxembourg or Syria or Zimbabwe or Burma.  “American greatness” does not exist in Mr Obama’s sphere of thinking.

This philosophy informs every move Mr Obama makes — or doesn’t make.

Your thoughts?

BZ

P.S.
Please read the Charles Krauthammer piece “Decline Is A Choice” at the WeeklyStandard.com.