Religious affiliation now a disqualifier for public service according to Democrats?

So say Leftists, to include Diane Feinstein.

From Breitbart.com:

Dianne Feinstein Interrogates Judicial Nominee’s Catholic Faith

by Joel B Pollak

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and other Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee questioned whether the Catholic faith of a judicial nominee would disqualify her from carrying out the duties of her intended office.

Stop. My first thought? President John F Kennedy. A Democrat. Back in 1961. Have we not progressed from there? Or have we regressed? Not A, but B.

Feinstein told Notre Dame Law School Professor Amy Coney Barrett, who has been nominated by President Donald Trump to serve on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, that “the dogma lives loudly within you. And that’s of concern when you come to big issues that large numbers of people have fought for for years in this country.”

Let’s listen to Diane Feinstein.

Now let’s listen to Dick Durbin.

Furthermore, Demorats ask: “can a Catholic be a judge?” A far cry from a Catholic president, is it not? Back in 1961? Back then: “a Catholic will ruin our nation.”

Perhaps we should next rightly ask: can a Muslim be a member of Congress? If not a Christian, then why a Muslim? Or a Buddhist? Or a Shinto priest? Keith Ellison and Andre Carson, go away. Right? Because they are “religious.”

Or is this a Constitutional issue the likes of which persons such as Diane Feinstein don’t comprehend as illustrated by her discourse with the late Antonin Scalia?

Gorsuch also happened to school Diane Feinstein during hearings.

Are you, like me, beginning to question the validity and veracity of Diane Feinstein with regard to overall competence? If not, you certainly should. We continue.

Feinstein was referring to abortion, though her question was based on a law review article written by Barrett in 1998 that argued that Catholic judges who object to the death penalty should recuse themselves from cases in which it is a possible sentence because “litigants and the general public are entitled to impartial justice.”

But wait. There’s more.

Article VI of the U.S. Constitution provides that “no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States,” yet Feinstein and other Democrats on the panel effectively imposed a religious test on Barrett. It was the second time in recent months that the opposition had attempted to do so: Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) asked Russell Vought, nominated for deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget, about his Christian belief that salvation comes only through Jesus, as if that would be disqualifying.

Bottom line — the one that the American Media Maggots fail to report?

Barrett stated, “I would stress that my personal church affiliation or my religious belief would not bear on my duties as a judge.”

There was a bit of pushback, from Politico.com:

Senators take fire over questions for Catholic judicial nominee

by Josh Gerstein

At least two prominent university presidents are accusing senators of religious bias for challenging a Catholic judicial nominee over her faith-driven views during a confirmation hearing last week.

University of Notre Dame President Rev. John Jenkins and Princeton University President Christopher Eisgruber both wrote letters objecting to lawmakers’ pointed questions on the topic to Notre Dame law professor Amy Barrett last week, whom President Donald Trump has nominated to the Chicago-based 7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.

Jenkins wrote directly to the Senate Judiciary Committee’s ranking Democrat, Dianne Feinstein of California, taking issue with her statements that Barrett’s worldview seems strongly driven by “dogma.”

“Your concern, as you expressed it, is that ‘dogma lives loudly in [Professor Barrett], and that is a concern when you come to big issues that large numbers of people have fought for years in this country,'” Jenkins wrote. “I am one in whose heart ‘dogma lives loudly,’ as it has for centuries in the lives of many Americans, some of whom have given their lives in service to this nation. Indeed, it lived loudly in the hearts of those who founded our nation as one where citizens could practice their faith freely and without apology.”

Look, this is truly nothing new in terms of today’s Demorats. Religion, with the exception of Islam, means nothing. Perhaps less than nothing, rolling over to subjugation and oppression.

If only Leftists would focus their critical eyes inwards.

Demorats fear the law. They only wish new interpretations and not decisions based but upon precedent.

BZ

 

Rigging The Election — Video III

The third in a continuing series of videos from James O’Keefe of Project Veritas — the same individual whose videos ended up shutting down and eradicating the biased and corrupt group ACORN.

Please watch the first two videos, here and here.

Nice to know that some of these loving persons were fired or otherwise removed from their positions — but only after being caught on video. This also confirms by way of Bob Creamer: Hillary Clinton was personally involved.

Voter fraud? What voter fraud? Remember, Hillary Rodham Clinton wants you Proles, Groundlings, Serfs and Commoners to be “an unaware and compliant citizenry.”

hillary-clinton-unaware-compliant-citizenryProven by Wikileaks.

The truth? When the fix is in, the American Media Maggots are corrupt, the FBI is corrupt, the DOJ is corrupt, the Department of State is corrupt, your entire federal government is corrupt — who’s next? Jump on in, the betrayal of the American people is just fine.

At this point:

Hey, treachery must have some good points after all, right?

You bet. Money and power. Ask Hillary Rodham Clinton.

BZ

 

Rigging the Election, Video II: Mass Voter Fraud

Journalist James O’Keefe has been investigating the DNC and the rampant fraud and corruption inherent within Demorats, Leftists, Progressives et al. Part I of his series is here. Below is Part II.

Not simply hearsay corruption and voter fraud, not just hints of it, but speech documented on video for all to see.

As Mr O’Keefe says, “truth is dangerous.”

The TV broadcasters who had lined up to air his videos pulled out at the last moment — including Fox News — as they fear retaliation by a Hillary Clinton administration should she step into the Spite House. Look at the IRS and various conservative groups, for example. At the extreme, look at Vince Foster or Seth Rich. Then ask yourself: do you wonder that Hillary Clinton wants to conduct a drone strike on Julian Assange? Not just idle talk, you see. With that, do you wonder why Assange — a Leftist himself — in turn orchestrated the HRC email dump on Wikileaks? I’d call that motivation enough.

And yet, you see before your eyes, my eyes, that the system is corrupt and it is systemic, from the massively-biased journalists who shield the powerful and the venal to the education system and, soon, SCOTUS should HRC be elected.

“For the want of a handful of stalwart, non-corruptible DC politicians the nation was lost.”

The American Media Maggots lie, cheat, cover-up, purposely obfuscate with an absolutely unbridled and naked abandon. Even caught, they continue to lie.

How can you fight corruption, lies, deceit, treachery and indifference of this magnitude? What is the alternative except taking down the entire system itself? Don’t doubt for a moment that Leftists have and are enabling the Cloward-Piven Strategy.

Again: “those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”  — JFK

BZ

 

The US media LIES and CHEATS on behalf of Democrats & Leftists

That is the truth. And the truth continues to manifest itself daily.

Please watch this video — Part I — by journalist James O’Keefe following a year-long investigation. His scheduled appearance on Fox News? Now canceled. Witness:

The American Media Maggots lie, cheat, cover-up, purposely obfuscate with an absolutely unbridled and naked abandon. Even caught, they continue to lie.

Just like the presidential candidate they support, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Now CNN states it is illegal for you to look and search topics at Wikileaks whilst, concurrently, it is perfectly legal for them to do so.

To that I say: oh really? Only CNN has the legality, authority and moral high ground to properly vet what it is that you, an American citizen, may or may not see or know? Have you seen such arrogance?

Guess what? Here is the link to Wikileaks, ladies and gentlemen. Peruse to your heart’s content. To hell with CNN.

Check these recent Drudge revelations — a mere sampling, just today:

PAPER: CORPORATIONS USED CLINTON FUNDRAISERS TO LOBBY STATE…
Bernie’s Shame: Rallies for Her Amid Humiliating Leaks…

PAPER: How Hillary ‘Resting Bitch Face’ Could Be Swaying Voters…
SUPPORTERS STRUGGLE TO NAME SINGLE ACCOMPLISHMENT!

Illegal Border Crossings Surge…
+23%…

America’s ruling families unite on immigration…

Over 4,500 redactions in Clinton FBI docs…
So Unpleasant Security Agents Didn’t Want To Protect Her…
Snubbed Diplomats to Stay Near Huma…
Do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do attitude…
‘Immense Pressure’ Not to Mark Docs CLASSIFIED…
‘SHADOW GOVERNMENT’ REVEALED…

I am almost bereft of words at this point.

How can you fight corruption, lies, deceit, treachery and indifference of this magnitude?

I will continue to try, but I have my own personal fears. Is democracy dead? Have we lost our republic?

Perhaps it’s time to quote a Democrat, the 35th President of the United States, John Fitzgerald Kennedy, who said:

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”

BZ