AMM covers Michelle Obama’s LIE regarding “automatic weapons”

Yes.  The American Media Maggots.

AMM - American Media Maggots 1A long time ago, I was a “journalist” myself.  I worked for a major Fornicalia radio station and was sent to any number of events in order to cover them.  My reports didn’t include personal biases because I had actual Editors.  Any personal “bias” was simply removed.  I was limited to facts and reality.

Today, that paradigm has changed entirely.  “Journalists” are nothing more than parrots and copiers of whatever fecal material stems from DC and White House press releases.

In a sentence: the AMM are in the tank for Mr Obama and his wife Michelle.

The most recent facts in evidence?  Glad you asked!


ABC defends editing Michelle Obama’s ‘automatic weapon’ claim

ABC is defending its decision to edit out an apparently erroneous claim by Michelle Obama in its broadcast of the first lady’s interview on Good Morning America today, saying it made the changes “solely” for the sake of time.

Michelle Obama said, regarding a Chicago shooting:

“She was standing out in a park with her friends in a neighborhood blocks away from where my kids…grew up, where our house is. She had just taken a chemistry test. And she was caught in the line of fire because some kids had some automatic weapons they didn’t need,” she said. “I just don’t want to keep disappointing our kids in this country. I want them to know that we put them first.”

So-called “automatic weapons”?

Uh, no.  I call bullshit.  And I smell it though my nose is predominantly ineffective.  A massive lie.

The truth is here:

In fact, Chicago Police reported Pendleton was shot by a man who “opened fire with a handgun before fleeing in a waiting car,” according to the Associated Press.

But, of course, the American Media Maggots can’t be seen to report accurately as to Michelle Obama’s inaccuracy, her bias, her ineffectiveness, her anti-Gun agenda, her transparent Leftist leanings.

The “so-called ‘truth’ ” on ABC?

ABC News commented on its editing choice this afternoon, telling Mediaite, “The full story was posted to our website in advance of the interview being broadcast. The edits made to Robin’s interview with the First Lady were made solely for time.”

Right.  “Edited for time.”

How about: “edited for corruption?