What separates Americans from Proles, Groundlings and Serfs.
Mr Obola (not unlike many in Islam who wish to convert us or kill us) told citizens precisely what he was going to do upon his election: “we are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”
And transform he has. Charles Krauthammer illustrates but a few of the topics run-roughshod by Obama’s Executive abuse:
Make no mistake, Mr Obola is in the process of this action.
Obama makes no bones about saying he’ll unilaterally enable national amnesty for Mexicans:
by Suzanne Gamboa
(Leon) Rodríguez’s agency (USCIS) will be front and center once President Barack Obama announces the executive action he’ll take on immigration. Obama said he would take executive action after the elections but before the end of the year.
“We’re going to be ready,” Rodríguez said. “Our agency will be shouldering the primary responsibility for executing whatever it is.”
Rodríguez declined to elaborate when he was asked by a reporter to give more details on what types of preparations he is making.
Indeed; what kinds of preparations? How about these types of preparations:
by Charlie Spiering
When asked about the report at the White House Press Briefing today, Earnest referred Breitbart News to the USCIS for comment.
A draft solicitation for bids issued by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Oct. 6 says potential vendors must be capable of handling a “surge” scenario of nine million id cards in one year “to support possible future immigration reform initiative requirements.”
I’m sure you can do the mathematical political forecasting on that one. As in: Imperial Obola Edict = get thy shit in gear.
The Washington Times already indicates Mr Obola is ready to open the proverbial illegal immigrant floodgates despite the concurrent problems of terrorism, Ebola and lesser-but-still-important diseases recently brought into this country (and previously eradicated with much effort) by illegal children:
EDITORIAL: Green cards on the table
President Obama lets slip his scheme for a permanent majority
by THE WASHINGTON TIMES
The White House intended to remain silent about its plans for immigration. Revealing a scheme to open the floodgates of amnesty would be disastrous on the eve of the critical midterm elections. But this is the gang that can’t shoot straight.
The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services on Friday threw open the door to as many as 100,000 Haitians, who will now move into the United States without a visa. Sen. Chuck Grassley, Iowa Republican, rightly and accurately denounced enabling Haitians awaiting a U.S. visa to enter the country and legally apply for work permits as “an irresponsible overreach of the executive branch’s authority.”
That was just the beginning. The immigration agency earlier this month had solicited a printer able to handle a “surge” of 9 million green cards “to support possible future immigration-reform initiative requirements.” In an ordinary year, about 1 million green cards are issued, and over the life of this contract the company is expected to produce up to 34 million cards, a figure representing an increase of the population of the United States by 10 percent.
The cards do not come with automatic voter registration, but that’s obviously what the scheme portends. President Obama’s promised “executive actions” to bring about this enormous wave of amnesty constitute a transparent and cynical ploy to expand the Democratic voter base, creating a permanent majority.
For those of you who just tuned in, let me open the door to the Department of Redundancy Dept:
“President Obama’s promised ‘executive actions’ to bring about this enormous wave of amnesty constitute a transparent and cynical ploy to expand the Democratic voter base, creating a permanent majority.”
A “permanent majority.”
So where did honesty and fairness and equality go, pray tell, Lefitsts?
Ah yes, that’s correct; it never existed.
The Washington Times pointedly continues:
In economic terms, importing millions of unskilled workers creates competition for the diminishing number of available jobs. Combine a flooded job market with the Democratic proposals for a doubling of the minimum wage to $15 an hour, and millions more American citizens will be without a job. Those who do have jobs will pay to provide federal freebies, from Obamaphones to Obamacare, to the formerly illegal aliens now with a green card.
As the recent influx of minor children over the southern border demonstrates, word of amnesty on the way travels fast. Handing green cards to those who cheated the system and entered the country illegally creates an incentive to millions more to follow in their path, collecting as many benefits as possible along the way. It’s a disaster in the making — indeed already here — for public health and national security, straining the welfare state to its limit.
This also brooks the question: what about the rest of America? What if some various groups of Americans decide they will obey some specific and chosen laws and not others? There will be precedent now, you see.
Most Americans want no part of this. A Gallup survey finds that 74 percent of Americans want the level of immigration to stay where it is, or reduce it. Mr. Obama has no support for his amnesty scheme except from those who want to transform America into a nation that no one would recognize. Voters can get to work on stopping the transformation on Nov. 4.
Further, since the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, Congress has passed seven amnesties:
1. Immigration and Reform Control Act (IRCA), 1986: A blanket amnesty for over 2.7 million illegal aliens
2. Section 245(i) Amnesty, 1994: A temporary rolling amnesty for 578,000 illegal aliens
3. Section 245(i) Extension Amnesty, 1997: An extension of the rolling amnesty created in 1994
4. Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (NACARA) Amnesty, 1997: An amnesty for close to one million illegal aliens from Central America
5. Haitian Refugee Immigration Fairness Act Amnesty (HRIFA), 1998: An amnesty for 125,000 illegal aliens from Haiti
6. Late Amnesty, 2000: An amnesty for some illegal aliens who claim they should have been amnestied under the 1986 IRCA amnesty, an estimated 400,000 illegal aliens
7. LIFE Act Amnesty, 2000: A reinstatement of the rolling Section 245(i) amnesty, an estimated 900,000 illegal aliens
But now? Millions and millions of Mexicans. Others will squeeze through too. You know; people who belong to ISIS and al Qaeda and various and sundry marginalized groups who simply need more understanding and sympathy.
With that, apparently we require another amnesty? The prior seven were somehow insufficient?
Mr Obola makes it clear that his fundamental transformation disincludes you, if you happen to be Caucasoid. Parenthesis: you evil aged racists and sexists, no matter your age. And your hated spawn. End of parenthesis.
Yes. Fundamentally transforming the United States of America.
Today is the last day the FCC will allow you to express your opinion on so-called “net neutrality.” You can go to the FCC website here.
A nice phrase, except that “net neutrality” isn’t. Neutral, that is.
It is a ways and a means for the government to control and regulate something that doesn’t require controlling and regulating — all it requires is what it currently has: a free market.
When “net neutrality” exists, two things primarily occur: 1) rates go up and 2) innovation plummets.
The bulk of Western Europe has a version of NN and those precise things have occurred: rate hikes and a lack of entrepreneurship and cutting-edge technology. Not to mention general overall lower internet connectivity speeds.
For the obvious reason that, in order to get anything accomplished, a new idea or upgrade has to be proposed to an entirely new and large bureaucracy that will do its best to sit on and table said idea or upgrade, simply to exhibit its power and “prove” its worth.
Public utilities are regulated because everyone needs water and power. Those things aren’t merely “suggestions.” They are mandatory for survival. The internet, however, is not “mandatory” for survival. It’s a “nice” thing to have but you won’t die due to its removal from your life.
So-called “net neutrality” is a specious solution for a problem that doesn’t even exist. It gets our government into an area where it doesn’t belong. And I go back to some of my foundational Libertarian bents here, which occasionally get the best of me:
When the government, any government, intrudes into the primary source of communications today — the internet — it can shut you down when you proffer speech that IT doesn’t care for. Which is what Socialist and Communist countries do, and nations run by dictators.
Signing off on “net neutrality” will not only allow the government to have its hands upon the spigot, but will allow it to silence you and potentially prosecute you as well. For speech that it does not approve — on the Left or on the Right.
Leftists in the government are already working to revamp the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights but, specifically, the First and Second Amendments. Facts in evidence.
Note to self: continue to look around.
What does Free Speech protect? It assures the worst of speech; it assures the most challenging of speech. It does not exist for milktoast speech. It embraces truth and emotion and change and shocking speech. Sometimes older speech can be the most shocking, the most challenging, and the most warranted.
From the WashingtonTimes.com:
by Cheryl K. Chumley
A pro-gun incumbent sheriff in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, beat back the anti-gun money of former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg to win his primary contest for re-election by a handy margin, 52-48 percent.
In my mind, Memorial Day and the Second Amendment go hand-in-hand, as does the full Bill of Rights and our US Constitution.
More and more persons, Leftists and the ignorant and the naive, want to give and bargain away our freedoms for perceived security.
They predicate their decisions, opinions and philosophies but upon emotions and not facts or reality.
One man said:
There comes a time when one must take the position that is neither safe nor politic nor popular, but he must do it because conscience tells him it is right.”
Who was this man?
Martin Luther King, Jr.
One man said:
Who was this man?
Sir Winston S. Churchill.
Why is this country still safe? Its Constitution and Bill of Rights. And its military soldiers.