Category Archives: Islam

The British are officially insane:

Posted on by
13

Muslim Nurse in the UK

Muslim nurse in the UK.

From the European Union Times.net:

UK allows Muslim nurses to not wash to protect their “modesty”

The UK Department of Health recently announced that it would loosen hygiene rules for Muslim and Sikh doctors and nurses. From now on, Muslim female staff will not need to wash their hands before procedures as it compromises their modesty. Instead, they will have the admittedly less sanitary option of wearing disposable plastic over-sleeves.

Acknowledging the danger of microbes and death, a Department of Health spokesman said, “The guidance is intended to . . . balance infection control measures with cultural beliefs.” But, believe it or not, from a culturist perspective, the death of some patients is not the main cause for concern that this policy elicits.

The most dangerous problem is that this policy encodes multiculturalism not culturism. Whereas culturism acknowledges that England has a majority culture to protect and promote, this multiculturalist policy implicitly says that England has no core culture. It says that the nation can be whatever pressure groups decide it is. It, therefore, officially ends the dominance of English culture in England.

Let’s review: in England, you, the patient, are merely the not-so-involved “intermediary” between a culture that values their traditional belief systems — and sepsis, infection and death.

Aided and abetted by the finest UK medical professionals who quake in fear of “offending.”

Not a bad place to be, considering you, the patient, may potentially be sacrificed on the bloody altar of Politically Correct Appeasement.

But at least, if as a patient you acquire a raging infection from a Muslim not having properly disinfected, you can take comfort in the fact that you’ve offended no one in the vicinity.

A reminder from Ozzie Saffa for those unfamiliar with the whole Muslim Thingie:

(and keep in mind that they use their hands and water to wash after going to the toilet – no kaffir toilet paper for them)

Wow; I feel so much better already.

And you?

I mean, you won’t mind sacrificing some known critical medical safety precepts as long as you know you’re making Muslims “feel” better, will you?

Ah, you Brits, you’re just kidding, right?  — right?

BZ

P.S.
H/t to Ozzie Saffa via Hugh.

 

 

Even the Taliban hate Microsoft Outlook

Posted on by
4

From a glorious article at ABCNews.com:

In a Dilbert-esque faux pax, a Taliban spokesperson sent out a routine email last week with one notable difference.He publicly CC’d the names of everyone on his mailing list.

The names were disclosed in an email by Qari Yousuf Ahmedi, an official Taliban spokesperson, on Saturday. The email was a press release he received from the account of Zabihullah Mujahid, another Taliban spokesperson. Ahmedi then forwarded Mujahid’s email to the full Taliban mailing list, but rather than using the BCC function, or blind carbon copy which keeps email addresses private, Ahmedi made the addresses public.

“Taliban have included all 4 of my email addresses on the leaked distribution list,” tweeted journalist Mustafa Kazemi, a prolific Kabul-based tweeter with more than 9,500 followers. “Quite reassuring to my safety.”

Overall, there were some 400 persons involved.

Ooopsie!

BZ

 

 

US Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez considers laws on “blasphemy”

Posted on by
9

First, watch the video:

What conclusion can you draw other than a major high-ranking US federal government official is disinterested in upholding the First Amendment of the US  Constitution?

Specifically, in July of this year, Representative Trent Franks (R – Arizona, 2nd District) speaks with AAG Perez in an attempt to acquire an affirmation of free speech.

Which, as you can see, was avoided like the proverbial plague.

Like attempting to nail Jello to a tree.

However, let me do what I call the “logical extension,” and that is this: “blasphemy” would include Islam.  Perhaps Buddhism.  Perhaps Hinduism.  Perhaps Sikhism.  Perhaps Shinto.  Perhaps Rastafarianism.  Perhaps Scientology.

But not to include either Christianity or Judaism.  And trust me when I tell you: Islam will be on TOP of the Blasphemic Heap.

Isn’t it reassuring to realize your foundational First Amendment is held in such high regard by members of the current Obama Administration?

BZ

 

 

Information revealed behind the video & maker alleged to be “responsible” for Middle East violence:

Posted on by
20

From YahooNews.com:

APNewsBreak: US identifies anti-Muslim filmmaker

WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal authorities have identified a Coptic Christian in southern California who is on probation after his conviction for financial crimes as the key figure behind the anti-Muslim film that ignited mob violence against U.S. embassies across the Mideast, a U.S. law enforcement official told The Associated Press on Thursday.

The official said authorities had concluded that Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, 55, was behind “Innocence of Muslims,” a film that denigrated Islam and the prophet Muhammad and sparked protests earlier this week in Egypt, Libya and most recently in Yemen. It was not immediately clear whether Nakoula was the target of a criminal investigation or part of the broader investigation into the deaths of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans in Libya during a terrorist attack.

A convenient dupe.

Here is what I found for a related video:

There is, of course, a very large HOWEVER:

This “however” includes the fact that the “video” — and here’s a novel suggestion — is nothing more than a convenient excuse for the kickoff of ubiquitous global violence instigated on 9/11 against Western institutions, buildings and locations.

If there were a series of violent revolutions in Detroit resulting from Michael Moore’s “Roger and Me,” would there be a subsequent excoriation of both Mr Moore and his film?

I might submit: not.

The “video” is a ruse.

Islam is, once again, at work against those GOWPs — Guilty Overeducated White People — who are sufficiently naive, guilty, glittered, ignorant, and representative of the bulk of Western Culture.

One small piece of positivism: Google refuses to pull the “suspect clip” against White House demands.

And here is the actual truth of these “riots.”

BZ

 

 

ESCALATION: Attacks and killings at US Embassies coordinated to 9/11

Posted on by
8

From Reuters:

(Reuters) – The U.S. ambassador to Libya and three embassy staff were killed in an attack on the Benghazi consulate and a safe house refuge, stormed by Islamist gunmen blaming America for a film they said insulted the Prophet Mohammad.

HOWEVER, from the New York Post:

TRIPOLI, Libya — US officials are increasingly suspicious that the murder Tuesday of the US ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens and three other American officials was not the result of a protest against an anti-Islam film, but instead was a coordinated terror strike timed for the 11th anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks.

It is no coincidence that the attacks were carried out on 9/11.  That said, the NYPost got the above caption WRONG.  I submit: Ambassador Stevens isn’t being “helped,” he’s being violently dragged through the streets.  Gateway Pundit concurs.

It is a political axiom that you respond to words with words, and you respond to actions with actions.

Mr Obama’s response?

President Obama strongly condemned the attacks, while also calling on embassies across the globe to increase security.

“Right now, the American people have the families of those we lost in our thoughts and prayers,” Obama said. “They exemplified America’s commitment to freedom, justice, and partnership with nations and people around the globe, and stand in stark contrast to those who callously took their lives.”

As I’ve said before, here is what Mr Obama does:

- He is concerned; and
- He is monitoring

I hope Mr Stevens’s family has excellent insurance, because he was sacrificed by the Obama Administration and the State Department in the game that Mr Obama foists on the global playing field.  You can rest assured that Mr Obama will only “monitor” with “concern.”

BZ