Tag Archives: American flag

NY flag burners frightened by Caucasoids with squirt guns

Posted on by

NY Park Flag Burning Squirt Guns

[Photo courtesy of Todd Starnes on Twitter.]

Aw, how sad, flag burners in New York City got scared by a couple of white male adults with squirt guns.

From Breitbart.com:

Veterans and Bikers Crash Flag Burning Protest in New York City Park

by Alex Swoyer

Anti-police activists set out to protest racism in a New York City park Wednesday by burning the American flag. Instead, they “got a huge surprise from a group of veterans and bikers who sent the flag-burners scattering — and getting an exit escort from the same police they demonstrate against,” according to BizPac Review.

The activist group wanting to protest – “Disarm NYPD” – planned the event days in advance, but residents and the Mayor’s office were encouraging them to find another way to voice their concern, as Breitbart News previously reported.

“We maintain, unwaveringly, that both the Confederate flag, and the American flag are symbols of oppression,” the group stated.

Right.  The American flag, a symbol of oppression.

However: the counter-protesters came prepared with water guns and their own flags.  Pushback such as this was certainly not on their agenda.

Protesters good; counter-protesters Evil.  Capital E.  (Millennials don’t know the difference between capital and capitol.  You see?  I educate.)

IWO JIMABecause, after winning in Europe and Japan during WWII, the US became nothing but an evil occupier of those countries.  The Marshall Plan was really all about stealing the oil and diamonds there.  Oh, such Evil Americans.

Therefore, the protesters burning flags in the New York park were certainly justified in doing so and merely sought validation for their thoughts.  Who could possibly argue against burning the American flag?  Certainly Syrians couldn’t.  ISIS couldn’t.  Iranians couldn’t.  See?  Everyone agrees the American flag needs to be burned.

NY Flag BurningAgain I say: I was correct.  And Rush Limbaugh was right.

“They’re losers looking for a few minutes of fame,” John Carroll told New York City’s CBS2 News. “And they didn’t even have the guts to do it down there where they were far outnumbered. And I got here before they destroyed it completely.”

The protesters were none too pleased with the bikers and vets.

Good clean fun, in the Brooklyn park.

Even Socialist/Marxist NY Major Bill DeBlasio said:

“This protest is a divisive, disrespectful way to express views, and does not reflect the values of our city. The American flag represents national unity, our shared ideals and honors the brave women and men who have served our country,” de Blasio said in a statement issued before the protest, according to CBS2.

While the intent of the demonstration may have been to open a dialogue about race, the focus for many was on the burning flag.

“If you’re going to burn the American flag, you’re going to run the risk of running into people like me,” said John Carroll of Ridgewood, one of the pro-flag demonstrators. “I will stand by this flag all the time.”

“Colonial Imperialism still exists.”

What the hell?  Are you this incredibly stupid?

But what Leftists truly think:

“We do not believe the ideals of America are anything to be revered … We dream of what real freedom looks like: freedom from paramilitaries occupying our communities, beating and killing our sons and daughters; freedom from our communities being destroyed by the speculative capital of gentrification; freedom from mass surveillance; and freedom from systemic racism,” the statement continued. “So, we will burn the American flag, a symbol of oppression and genocide, and in the same action, dismantle our stunted, cynical expectations of what is possible in the world.”

And just who enabled the suppression of freedom?  Just who enabled mass surveillance?  Oh right.  Government.  Your government.  The one you claim to love so much.

BZ

 

 Share

Who voted to remove the US flag from UC Irvine?

Posted on by

[For reference, please read this first.]

And here they are:

UC Irvine Students Who Voted To Remove US FlagAmazing, yes, that there isn’t one Caucasoid amongst them, eh wot?

However, I suggest that those students are sexist, handicappist, racist, weightist and religionist, as they clearly appear to lack an Islamist in the mix, a transgender Albanian dwarf, a cross-dresser, a bald lesbian, a fat Tongan, a person in a wheelchair and a convicted felon.

BZ

UC Irvine Question

 Share

UC Irvine students despise America

Posted on by

UC Irvine chose illegals over the American flag.  It is termed a “weapon of nationalism.”

From Breitbart.com:

UC Irvine Student: US Flag Banned to Avoid ‘Triggering’ Hurt Feelings Among Illegals

by Adelle Nazarian

 UCI student Matthew Guevara, who sits on the Student Association board, authored the resolution (R50-70) to ban the U.S. flag from the association’s lobby wall. The resolution passed narrowly on Thursday in a 6-4 vote in favor, with two abstentions, but was overturned and vetoed on Saturday during a private meeting held by the Associated Student’s Executive Cabinet by a 4-1 vote.

Imagine that.  The American flag voted as offensive by some ignorant puerile male with a Mexican name.

But even more specifically, by a Mexican Leftist:

Penned by Matthew Guevara, a student in the school of social ecology, the resolution stated: “Designing a culturally inclusive space aims to remove barriers that create undue effort and separation by planning and designing spaces that enable everyone to participate equally and confidentially.”

“The American flag has been flown in instances of colonialism and imperialism,” the resolution continued. “Flags not only serve as symbols of patriotism or weapons for nationalism, but also construct cultural mythologies and narratives that in turn charge nationalistic sentiments.”

The resolution noted that in certain spaces “freedom of speech” can be interpreted as “hate speech.”

The American flag is, therefore, colonialistic, imperialistic, nationalistic.

And finally, there it is, admitted by Leftists:

“Freedom of speech” can be interpreted as “hate speech.”

Leftsts admit that is where they want to go.  They are the final arbiters of what can be considered “hate speech” and what cannot.  They are the “deciders-in-chief” of who can say what, and the concomitant penalties for straying.

The “ban,” however, didn’t remain in place for terribly long.

Four days after its birth, the radical push to remove national symbols from student government facilities was dead. On Saturday, student leaders vetoed the resolution, according to the Times.

Because of this incident, Fornicalia may decide to address the issue legislatively — and how said is that?

On Friday, state Sen. Janet Nguyen (R-Santa Ana) told the AP that legislators may introduce a state constitutional amendment prohibiting “state-funded universities and college campuses from banning the United States flag.”

Breitbart.com provides some additional insight:

A student who spoke with Breitbart News on condition of anonymity that she heard a member of the ASUCI discussing “the [American] flag and how it triggered people.” She then said she believed a major line of reasoning behind the legislation to remove the flag could have been a “precautionary step” to prevent a trigger situation where if someone is an “illegal citizen or [they] have citizenship issues, it makes them feel bad.

“But me and my friends were like, ‘Dude, you’re in America. It’s the American flag,’” she added.

The issue, according to her, was that the flag was placed in a common space, and she felt that if it were placed in a private area like a personal office, it would not have been a big deal. “And then there were people who were like ‘the flag triggers me’ — that was their exact wording, too.”

She added: “Everything can be a trigger. How far is it going to go? If everyone says something bothers them about a shared space then that could be a problem because then there will be nothing on any walls.”

How far will it go?

It will go as far as allowed, until there is pushback and common sense injected.  In this case, common sense and pushback have won the day.

For now.

BZ

 

 Share

The US flag: a “threat to Muslims” in America

Posted on by

American Flag Threat To MuslimsFrom KHOU.com:

Man says apartment complex called his US flag a ‘threat to Muslim community’

by Alice Barr

WEBSTER, Texas — A Webster man says his apartment complex manager told him his American flag was a “threat to the Muslim community,” and that he has to take it down. But he’s not giving up without a fight.

Stepping onto Duy Tran’s balcony in Webster, one thing is clear: “It means a lot to me,” he said.

He’s talking about his American flag that he proudly put up when he moved in just a few days ago. But then an apartment manager at the Lodge on El Dorado told him he had to take it down.

“What really stunned me is that she said it’s a threat towards the Muslim community,” said Tran. “I’m not a threat toward anybody.”

There you go.  The American flag is a threat to the Muslim community.  Not in the Middle East, mind you.  No.  In the United States of America.

This occurred in Webster, Texas, at the Lodge on El Dorado apartment homes.  Their mealy-mouthed pablum-smeared PC response:

“While the Lodge on El Dorado admires our resident’s patriotism, we must enforce our property rules and guidelines. Such guidelines maintain the aesthetics of our apartment community and provide for the safety of all residents. The apartment community already proudly displays our country’s flag in a safe and appropriate manner at the entrances to our community.”  

A “safe and appropriate manner.”  Just what would that be, pray tell?  And how does one display the American flag in an unsafe and inappropriate manner?

However, Mr Tran has said:

“I’m gonna leave my flag there, as an American, until she shows me proof that I don’t have the right to leave my flag there,” said Tran.

To Tran it’s about so much more than stars and stripes.

“I have friends that died for this country,” he said.

First: good for Mr Tran.  This is a man who plans to persevere in his efforts to honor the American flag.

Second: how is is that we as a nation have become so incredibly cowardly in the face of the Politically Correct Gestapo?  It is fear that drives this Leftist movement.  And apparently the administration in this Webster complex is comprised of the craven.

BZ

 

 Share

Just when you think things have gotten beyond ridiculous, it’s moreso: “Americans now ‘racist’ for waving American flag”

Posted on by

Mex_Flag_flying_over_US_flagAmericans now ‘racist’ for waving American flag.

‘What’s wrong with these white people?’

by Bob Unruh

Americans now are being blasted as “racist” for the simple act of waving an American flag.

It happened Monday in California to a small group of protesters who waved U.S. flags in front of a school where officials had banned the practice to avoid violence threatened by Hispanic students celebrating Cinco de Mayo.

Let me be clear: many Mexicans call the 5th of May “Cinco de Gringo,” because it’s more revered by Caucasoids than Mexicans.

The controversy brought a small group of protesters out Monday, and the community reacted immediately.

“What’s wrong with these white people holding up American flags in Morgan hill??? Racist a–holes,” wrote Gia Lee in a feed monitored by Twitchy.

The report also noted the school superintendent was confirming that students wearing American flag-themed shirts on Monday “won’t be kicked out.”

“Read that sentence again and then cringe at the fact that had to be said in the United States,” the Twitchy report said.

The San Francisco Chronicle reported a group called Gilroy-Morgan Hill Patriots stood in front of Live Oak High School for about an hour waving American flags.

The protest followed the decision earlier this year by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals that school officials, in a dispute four years ago, were right to suspend the First Amendment rights of students who wanted to wear U.S. flag-themed shirts on Cinco de Mayo.

How sad that people have to cringe in fear of negative labeling by embracing the flag of their nation.

Meaning: Mexicans refuse to embrace the flag of the nation they now live in and benefit from.  Truly, that is the issue here, nothing else.

Not the French, not Indonesians, not Filipinos, not Puerto Ricans, not Ethiopians, not Danes, not Icelanders, not Ukrainians, not Chileans, not Chinese.

Mexicans.

Let me remind all that Mexicans are actually South American Indians and speak Spanish because their country was conquered by Spain.  They don’t speak Aztec or Toltec or Mayan.  Mexicans speak Spanish.

One nice, embracing comment:

“F— your American flag. Racist as f—s. I’ll always have pride with my Mexican flag but not the American one,” wrote Ivan Mora.

Let me make this abundantly clear, so that I repeat:

“F— your American flag. Racist as f—s. I’ll always have pride with my Mexican flag but not the American one,” wrote Ivan Mora.

The case centers on a decision made on May 5, 2010, by Assistant Principal Miguel Rodriguez. During a break, Rodriguez told several school students they were not allowed to wear U.S. flag shirts. He allegedly told them that he had received complaints from some Hispanic students about the flag apparel, and the students were not allowed to wear clothing that would offend them.

Offense.  Wearing an American flag shirt qualifies as offensive.

Whilst, simultaneously, Mexicans embrace Mexico but not the country they currently inhabit.

Please read the full story here.

It is a sad, sad state of affairs.  America is now turned completely upside down.

But I submit: not for very much longer.

BZ

 

 Share