Featuring Right thinking from a left brain, doing the job the American Media Maggots won’t, embracing ubiquitous, sagacious perspicacity and broadcasting behind enemy lines in Occupied Fornicalia from the veritable Belly of the Beast, the Bill Mill in Sacramento, Fornicalia, I continue to proffer my thanks to the SHR Media Network for allowing me to utilize their studio and hijack their air twice weekly, Tuesdays and Thursdays, thanks to my shameless contract, as well as appear on the Sack Heads Radio Show each Wednesday evening.
My guest was the illustrious Dan Butcher of High Plains Media fame. He and I have been known to chat on Tuesdays and, as usual, I kept the topics hidden from Dan so that he can expound on them in a completely extemporaneous fashion. Unless I tell him what the topics are. But I usually don’t. That’s what makes it fun.
The topics covered in the Saloon included:
Christmas 2017: are you feeling it?
We discover: neither Dan nor BZ send out Christmas cards any more;
I read Kurt Schlichter’s article “Some Real Talk For Conservatives About 2018”;
Dan and I weigh in on certain salient points of the article;
Kurt hits it out of the park with his post, as he usually does;
Nikki Haley excoriates the UN — never would have occurred under HRC;
The GOP can pull things together;
Listen to the show for more.
If you care to listen to the show in Spreaker, please click on the yellow start button at the upper left.
If you care to watch the show on YouTube, please click on the red start button. Fear not, it’s actually the Berserk Bobcat Saloon and not the Sack Heads Radio Show..
Please join me, the Bloviating Zeppelin(on Twitter @BZep, Facebook as the Bloviating Zeppelin and on Gab.ai @BZep), every Tuesday and Thursday night on the SHR Media Network from 11 PM to 1 AM Eastern and 8 PM to 10 PM Pacific, at the Berserk Bobcat Saloon — where the speech is free but the drinks are not.
As ever, thank you so kindly for listening, commenting, and interacting in the chat room or listening later via podcast.
Want to listen to all the Berserk Bobcat Saloon archives in podcast? Go here.
Want to watch the past shows on YouTube? Please visit the SHR Media Network YouTube channel here.
Want to watch the show live on Facebook? Go to the SHR Media page on Facebook here.
Want to watch the show on High Plains TV? Go here.
Thank you one and all for listening, watching and supporting the SHR Media Network: “Conservative Media Done Right.”
My thanks to the SHR Media Network for allowing me to broadcast in their studio and over their air twice weekly, Tuesdays and Thursdays, as well as appear on the Sack Heads Radio Show™ each Wednesday evening.
Republican Karen Handel slays the $33 Million Dollar Man, Jon Ossoff;
Happy Stories: Florida man disarms 3 robbers with machetes and shotguns;
USS Fitzgerald collides with a huge container ship; 7 sailors are killed due to the terrible criminal negligence of the Fitzgerald’s OOD, the Officer of the Deck;
We speak to Kel Fritzi about all things Islam these days, to include Brussels;
Tami Jackson is coming as special guest this Thursday, June 22nd; be here!
If you care to listen to the show in Spreaker, please click on start.
If you care to watch the show on YouTube, please likewise click on start.
This Thursday in the Saloon for The Aftermath, I have none other than the glorious Tami Jackson on hand, proud Norwegian Blue (beautiful plumage), owner of Right Voice Media, exquisite host of the Tami Jackson Show on the 405 Media, Media/Marketing Director for Robar Guns, an Evangelical Christian who is NRA certified in Basic Pistol, a CHL holder trained in Concealed Carry Tactics by tier one shooting instructor, former Navy SEAL Jeff Gonzales. Tami J, as I call her, is well versed in All Things Conservative as I well discovered at the 2015 Hugh Hewitt TribbleFest in Disneyland, where I first met her. A warning up front: Tami Jackson has two speeds only: ON and OFF. Even so, I’ll wager I can get her to divulge some things heretofore undivulged. Tune in and listen! I promise: there will be much Conservative Buttery Goodness to hear and see.
Please join me, the Bloviating Zeppelin(on Twitter @BZep and on Gab.ai @BZep), every Tuesday and Thursday night on the SHR Media Network from 11 PM to 1 AM Eastern and 8 PM to 10 PM Pacific, at the Berserk Bobcat Saloon — where the speech is free but the drinks are not.
As ever, thank you so kindly for listening, commenting, and interacting in the chat room or listening later via podcast.
Want to listen to all the Berserk Bobcat Saloon archives in podcast? Go here. Want to watch the past shows on YouTube? Please visit the SHR Media Network YouTube channel here.
Is this “fake news”? I’d wager Snopes would conclude that it’s legitimate news.
Watch the video yourself and draw your own conclusions.
Busted:big media using fake actors?learn the script so fast and go on a terror attack site?Someone had to know about the attacks in advance? pic.twitter.com/FdMzrPEPyf
That solitary child just “happened” to be prominently featured in two entirely separate terror scenes, in two entirely separate locations (or were they?), with no pre-planning or forethought?
Did you also catch, when he was wearing the blue shirt, the child eyeball the camera to make sure it was adequately catching his caterwauling?
Leftist Facebook and Twitter, et al, are now saying they will be policing their sites for “fake news.” Really? And just who gets to determine what is real news and what is “fake news”?
Snopes, Which Will Be Fact-Checking For Facebook, Employs Leftists Almost Exclusively
by Alex Pfeiffer and Peter Hasson
Snopes, which will now have the power to declare what news is or is not legitimate on the world’s largest online platform, almost exclusively employs leftists.
Facebook announced Thursday that mythbusting website Snopes will be one of a few fact-checking organizations allowed to label stories as “fake news.”
Well I am just gobsmacked. Leftists fact-checking Leftists. Who could possibly have seen that developing? I wonder on what side Snopes will fall?
Almost all of the writers churning out fact checks for Snopes have a liberal background, and many of them have expressed contempt for Republican voters. The Daily Caller could not identify a single Snopes fact-checker who comes from a conservative background. Snopes did not respond to a list of questions from The DC regarding the site’s ideological leaning.
Again, I stand stunned. Leftists refusing to actually embrace their nature? Leftists are the most cowardly of persons on the planet. They cannot even own what they are.
Leftists lack the capacity to even admit one incontrovertible truth to themselves. For years I listened to, for example, Hugh Hewitt interview obvious Leftist after Leftist on his radio show, all of which refused to state their votes, their registrations, their affiliations, consistently insisting that they could remain impartial in any situation encountered. Of course, they lied time and again. They are as impartial as a judge in a Sharia court.
Snopes managing editor Brooke Binkowski said on Twitter that Brexit supporters were “pandering to racist mouth-breather ‘Britain First’ types.”
That’s clearly impartial. What else?
Snopes fact-checker Arturo Garcia is an editor-at-large for Raw Story. Garcia is also a managing editor of Racialicious, a pro-Black Lives Matter blog. One of Garcia’s most recent stories at Raw Story was titled “The next time your right-wing uncle tries to ruin the holidays with ‘proof’ of creationism, show him these videos.”
Your “right-wing uncle,” eh wot? But hey, Arturo Garcia wouldn’t be biased in the slightest towards Mexican immigrant issues, would he? Nah. He is clearly, instead, the most unbiased and impartial fact-checker that Snopes can locate. Here is his Twitter site. And here is his other Twitter site, Racialicious. Nope. No bias there whatsoever.
That’s just one of numerous examples. Read the links.
Facebook routinely buried conservative news and topics from trending on the site and artificially made liberal topics part of the national discussion, former Facebook employees admitted last May. TheDC previously reported that the former Facebook trending news team was filled by liberals. It has since automated the Trending Topics section of its page.
Because politicians, like yourself, only have the good of the electorate at heart.
Thanks, John. Good to know.
Good to know you’re not much interested in being honest, because politicians live and die by process. Yourself as well.
BZ
P.S.
Hugh Hewitt is no longer on PMs. He is now broadcasting live — temporarily from his Southern California studio — from 3 AM to 6 AM Pacific time, 6 AM to 9 AM Eastern time, during what is known in radio as “morning drive.”
He is leaving SoCal for a home in Virginia, as he is taking over Bill Bennett’s former Salem Broadcasting slot — a prime position to increase his audience and acquire more politicians and dealmakers direct from DC.
First, let’s see if the GOP candidates can even enter the stage without messing up their guidance from the CNN stage director. Okay. Seems as though they finally deduced how to enter a debate stage under clear instruction. That could bode well.
On Thursday night, the debate was hosted by CNN and featured the moderation team of Hugh Hewitt (he of Salem Broadcasting, who is leaving Fornicalia, the traitor, and moving to DC for a new AM radio slot), Dana Bash and María Celeste Arrarás in order to draw in the Mexican Telemundo crowd, illegals and all. George HW Bush, 91, was in the audience along with his wife Barbara.
[About Hewitt: “Hugh’s first morning broadcast will be Monday, April 4th. Soon SRN will announce a star performer who will join the lineup replacing Hugh in the all-important 6pm-9pm ET day part.”]
This is the last GOP debate before March 1st’s Super Tuesday, where voters in Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont and Virginia will hit the polls. In addition, Alaska Republicans and American Samoa Democrats will caucus that Tuesday.
A nice explanation of Super Tuesday is here:
The five candidates appearing on the University of Houston, TX stage were Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, Donald Trump and John Kasich.
Ben Carson started out the Uniter, Kasich still continues to piss me off (Kasich broadcasts the “I shouldn’t trust him” vibe to me), Rubio speaks well but I still can’t help but think he’d do a 180 on immigration if installed in the White House, Cruz welcomed everyone to Texas and, I have to tell you, I believe Cruz would attempt to do everything from DC he says he will. Trump started off a bit muted and with his standard bullet points of “winning again and a lot.”
Immigration was the first topic right off the bat.
Cruz brought up the point of Arizona, where illegal Mexicans fled, business owners complained about rising resulting wages, but dollars spent by Arizona on prisons, education and welfare went down by hundreds of millions of dollars. Unemployment dropped and wages rose. Rubio is still of concern to me about his Gang of 8. Then Rubio and Cruz made numerous points with Trump at the crux. Kasich hit the “practical path to legalization” for illegal Mexicans. Kasich acted as though there weren’t and aren’t fiscal and societal consequences for allowing illegals to flood the country. Carson wants a back tax penalty and future taxes on illegals.
Let me pause. That won’t happen, Carson. Illegals won’t pay back taxes. That’s an ignorant pie-in-the-sky point — and in particular since about 45% of Americans don’t pay taxes anyway. Roughly half of Americans pay no federal income tax because they have no taxable income, and the other roughly half get enough tax breaks to erase their tax liability,
Fact: the top 1 percent of taxpayers pay a higher effective income tax rate than any other group (around 23 percent, according to a report released by the Tax Policy Center in 2014) — nearly seven times higher than those in the bottom 50 percent.
Offhand, it sounds to me like those of us who are stupid enough to actually pay taxes — we are the morons.
Trump still has not dealt in specifics with regard to how he believes Mexico is going to pay for a wall at the southern border.
The Telemundo entree, María Celeste Arrarás, then accused Cruz of insufficient pandering to illegal Mexicans — make no mistake, this bimbette was present on the CNN stage to ensure her racist and nationalist bias comes through — because Cruz makes illegal immigration a point and, instead, should “go along to get along” with other Hispanics who want America’s immigration laws to be ignored and/or rescinded. The implication is that Cruz, as a Cuban/Hispanic, should be falling all over MCA in order to support “his own.”
Let’s stop right here. This racist María Celeste Arrarás wants breaks just for Mexicans and everyone else in the US can shut the hell up and pay for it all, simultaneously watching the country become more like Mexico and knowing it will then turn into the nation from which Mexicans currently flee.
What the fuck?
What part of that makes sense to people who believe in sovereign nations?
In a nice way, though, Cruz told the racist María Celeste Arrarás to buzz off.
The racist María Celeste Arrarás then worked on the weak link inhabiting the stage, John Kasich, who enjoys pandering to Mexicans, because she knows Kasich is the weak GOWP illegal Mexican link. He’d love him some amnesty, a big bag of it, for Mexican votes.
The racist María Celeste Arrarás finally brought up to Dr Ben Carson that “a report” (which remained unspecified) indicated that in order to approach Hispanics and “bring them to vote for the Republican Party, certain things needed to happen, and one of them was that they shouldn’t feel like they gonna get kicked out of the United States.”
Translated: law breaking Mexicans want not only preferential treatment, but they should be above the laws of the United States because they can provide votes to those who allow illegal Mexicans to break those same laws.
More prodding for preferential treatment for Mexicans from the racist María Celeste Arrarás.
“Or otherwise they wouldn’t pay attention to one more sentence from candidates.”
Translated: REPUBLICAN candidates who won’t kneel down to fellate the State of Mexico shaft.
Dr Ben Carson didn’t bite. You could clearly see the resulting look of pissedness on the face of the racist María Celeste Arrarás.
Hey Mexico, why don’t you just be clear and say what you want? You want to put a gun to the head of the American Taxpayer — the 54.7% of US citizens who actually pay taxes — and force them to send money directly to Mexico City?
After that little show, I immediately got tired of what the racist bint María Celeste Arrarás had to say.
Hugh Hewitt asked the first questions about SCOTUS and religious freedoms. Carson nailed it: “The Constitution protects all of our rights. It gives people who believe in same-sex marriage the same rights as everybody else. But what we have to remember is, even though everybody has the same rights, nobody gets extra rights.”
Thank you sir.
“Nobody gets to redefine things for everybody else and then have them have to conform to it. That’s unfair. It’s the responsibility of Congress to come back and correct what the Supreme Court has done.”
Let’s be plain. Trump still can’t be specific. He crafts his points in generalities.
And no one has brought up the debt crisis and emphasized it like Rubio. The debt crisis needs infinitely more focus and attention.
I got tired early of the tax return release issue. Move on.
One note: it was clear that the racist María Celeste Arrarás liked John Kasich. She smiled at him twice and no one else. Ever. Why? Because of Kasich’s support of illegal Mexicans.
Yes, there was backbiting in this debate but, thankfully, not to the extent of the last one. There was more focus on various issues this time around. Mostly. Sort of.
Who won?
First, I don’t care for Kasich. Period. Dr Ben Carson is a nice man but over his head. Yes, he is better coached but his forte is not the presidential seat.
Carson: “could someone attack me please?”
Yes, that’s how desperate the debates have become. I don’t really watch them for insight anymore; most people are way beyond that now.
At this point absent a severed trend, it appears Trump will continue with his numbers, Cruz will continue as number two and Rubio as number three.
The GOP debates aren’t for insight or an informational exchange any more. They simply provide a modicum of entertainment for me.
But the ultimate question?
Who in the GOP can beat Hillary Clinton or, if she implodes, Bernie Sanders or in extremis a farm team player like Joe Biden?