Boehner supports Obama on Iran deal

Boehner Obama's BITCHTime and again I hear on the Michael Medved show that the Republicans have fought bravely on behalf of the American Taxpayer.  I enjoy listening to Mr Medved but with the caveat that he is clearly a GOPEE supporter.

The GOPEE is starting to wear on me as it is on those who support Donald Trump.

The backlash which has manifested itself in the success of Donald Trump?  I understand it.  I don’t think it’s fruitful or will hold water in the end when the chips are down, but I understand the source of the frustration and its resulting orange hair.

And it is because of things like this that Trump continues to resonate despite his pettiness, his childish behavior and lack of insightful substance.

Because of things like this from Breitbart.com:

Republicans Thwart Boehner Plan To Move Forward On Obama’s Nuclear Arms Deal With Iran

by Matthew Boyle

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A full-scale revolt against House Speaker Rep. John Boehner (R-OH) —including a looming resolution that could come up for a vote at any time that would remove him from the speakership—has thrown into disarray the House GOP leadership’s previously carefully laid plans to push President  Obama’s nuclear arms deal with Iran through Congress without a fight.

The Boehner GOPEE is at work once again, “going along to get along” with Obama..

I term it the GOPEE because Boehner represents the GOP Establishment Elite, the same people who, at the end of the day, meet their good Demorat friends at local watering holes for expensive name drinks, backslapping all around, laughing prevalent at having screwed the American Taxpayer over another day.

Amid a rebellion in the House GOP conference meeting on Wednesday morning, leadership canceled a previously scheduled rule vote that would have set up the House putting through a resolution of disapproval of the president’s Iran deal under the terms of legislation previously signed into law from Sens Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) and Ben Cardin (D-MD).

This all happened as a result of an argument furthered by Reps. Mike Pompeo (R-KS) and Pete Roskam (R-IL) that Congress shouldn’t even vote on the Corker-Cardin resolution, either approving or disapproving of the Iran deal, since the president has not yet complied with the law regarding the release of text of the deal including “side deals” cut with Tehran.

In other words, Obama and his sycophants are insisting that Congress vote for something the likes of which they haven’t even seen in totality.  There are a host of “side deals” as yet unrevealed even to Congress.

Sound familiar?

Besides being an idiotic idea — supporting something that so very few have apparently even read in totality much less the “side bets” —  the parts that are known make no sense for the security of the United States, for Israel, or the world. We are giving nuclear weapons to Iran with essentially no monitoring of their program whatsoever.

Khamenei Tweet About Israel 1The Iranians are laughing, sending out Tweets (Iran’s Khameini is on Twitter, for God’s sake) that Israel will be gone in 25 years.  They are singularly pleased that the United States and the West could be such abysmally stupid dupes.

Khamenei Tweet About USIran’s Ayatollah Khamenei takes pleasure in the fact that Iran will not negotiate any further with the US unless it is in their favor — as with the nuclear deal.  Trump is correct: this is roughly the worlds worst negotiation.

It is action like this, endorsed by Speaker Boehner, that makes people like me, actual Conservatives, upset.

In four words, we are fed up.

Boehner and Republicans like Boehner have got to go.

Hence: the popularity of Trump.

Right or wrong, the popularity of Trump.

BZ

 

This is with whom Obama negotiates

Khamenei Tweet About ObamaYes, the persons who continue to advocate “death to America” and, now, send Twitter messages about Obama committing suicide.

Is this not absolute insanity unbridled?  Why do we negotiate with the mentally unbalanced, those persons who have not and will not hold to treaties and agreements?

With this issue and that of Planned Parenthood, I become more convinced that I am inhabiting some sort of alternate reality from my worst nightmares.

Then I wake up and read the news for another day.

BZ

P.S.

Blogging intermittent due to issues with forest fires in my area; see my prior posts for Saturday and Sunday.

Leftists go nuclear on Major Garrett

Obama WorshipOn Wednesday, CBS news journalist Major Garrett dared to ask Barack Obama a question that wasn’t the customary softball.  As a result, Obama went 210/190 on Mr Garrett, as I detailed in this post.  Please play the video if you’re unfamiliar with the situation.

Now, Leftists are incensed because Garrett deigned to pitch a pointed question.

Bill Maher weighs in, comparing the question to the N word.  From Breitbart.com:

Bill Maher Compares Major Garrett’s Obama Question to Hurling N-Word

by John Nolte

The same Bill Maher who bristles against political correctness and hurls obscene vitriol at every opportunity finally found someone who he believes crossed a line — that being Major Garrett of CBS News who dared ask President Obama a tough question during yesterday’s press conference on the Iran deal.

Maher not only called Garrett an “asshole,” the aging HBO comedian compared Garrett’s question to hurling the word “nigger.”

Maher Tweet Regards Major GarrettCNN also decided to unload at Garrett.  It is now, per Leftists and the AMM, “disrespectful” to pose anything but a soft, puffy, fluffy, loving question to the current president.

That is how protected by the American Media Maggots is Mr Barack Hussein Obama.

BZ

IRAN WON THE DEAL

Major Garrett asked a good question. . .

But not the best question.  It was, however, a great start.

And clearly, he angered Barack Hussein Obama.

Journalist Major Garrett, by the way, does not work for Fox News.  He works for CBS.

It only took roughly seven years before the so-called “leader of the free world,” Barack Obama, was asked something of a difficult question, as opposed to the continuous series of softballs Mr Obama customarily fields.

So what would have been the perfect follow-up question by Garrett to Mr Obama?

Garrett: “Why, sir, were those four Americans not part of the Iran deal when you so easily could have insisted upon that inclusion?”

Why not, Mr Obama?

Why not?

BZ

 

Obama hits Israel twice in one day

Islam MADFirst, of course, the nuclear deal with Iran appears to be “done,” so to speak, at this point, pending a few other things that may end up becoming glitches.  See my post here about the Iran nuclear agreement — wherein Iran walks away with everything it wanted and more, and the US walks away with a piece of white-hot rebar up its ass.

The US has now legitimized and promulgated the conduct of Iran and her seeking of nuclear weapons.  All programs begun by Iran with regard to this will be enhanced and even speeded up.  For attempting to become a nuclear nation, Iran has now been rewarded by the United States.  This has now essentially guaranteed a nuclear arms race in the Middle East, as certainly Saudi Arabia is going to want to go nuclear, as will Iraq, Jordan, Egypt and others.  Others who don’t necessarily play with each other very well in the sandbox.

This doesn’t even take ISIS into account.

Never in my life have I seen an American president be as overtly hostile — at best, dismissive — towards the security concerns of Israel.  Resultingly, Benjamin Netanyahu is angry, to say the least.  He quantifies the deal as “a bad mistake of historic proportions.”

Mr Netanyahu said:

Jerusalem (AFP) – Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Tuesday Israel was not bound by the nuclear deal between world powers and Iran, calling it a “historic mistake” and signalling he remained ready to order military action.

His harsh criticism of the agreement came after he warned for months that the deal being negotiated would not prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons that could be used to target Israel.

He also argued that lifting sanctions would allow Iran to further support proxy militants and add to the instability rocking parts of the Middle East.

He summarized:

“Israel is not bound by this deal with Iran, and Israel is not bound by this deal with Iran because Iran continues to seek our destruction,” he told reporters before a meeting of his security cabinet, which later rejected the accord.

“We will always defend ourselves.”

But wait, there’s more.  More bad news for Israel, that is.  From the WashingtonFreeBeacon.com:

U.S. Will Teach Iran to Thwart Nuke Threats

Iran: ‘All our goals materialized’ under deal

by Adam Kredo

The United States and other world powers will help to teach Iran how to thwart and detect threats to its nuclear program, according to the parameters of a deal reached Tuesday to rein in Iran’s contested nuclear program.

Under the terms of a deal that provides Iran billions of dollars in sanctions relief, Iran and global powers will cooperate to help teach Iran how to manage its nuclear infrastructure, which will largely remain in tact under the deal.

Iran is, naturally, jubilant once again.

Senior Iranian officials, including the country’s president, celebrated the deal as a victory for the country. Iran’s state controlled media quoted President Hassan Rouhani as saying that the deal will “remove all sanctions while maintaining [Tehran’s] nuclear program and nuclear progress.”

Yes, you read correctly.  The US is going to show Iran how to defend its nuclear facilities against — what?  Oh yes, attacks from Israel.

In what is being viewed as a new development, European countries and potentially the United States agreed to “cooperate with Iran on the implementation of nuclear security guidelines and best practices,” according to a copy of the agreement furnished by both the Russians and Iranians.

This will include “training courses and workshops to strengthen Iran’s ability to prevent, protect and respond to nuclear security threats to nuclear facilities and systems as well as to enable effective and sustainable nuclear security and physical protection systems,” according to the text.

Additional “training and workshops” would work to “strengthen Iran’s ability to protect against, and respond to nuclear security threats, including sabotage, as well as to enable effective and sustainable nuclear security and physical protection systems,” the text states.

This is the part where your mouth falls open and you whisper to yourself, “what the fuck?”

Obama says this is the best deal possible for the citizens of the United States.  Yet he says he will veto any movement by Congress to influence the deal in any fashion whatsoever.  What portion of that makes any sense to you whatsoever?  The only thing to defeat that will be a veto-proof majority of Republicans and Demorats in concert.

Good luck with that.

BZ