Broadcasting at 11 PM Eastern, 8 PM Pacific, 10 PM Central, everyone is cordially invited to please join us for this landmark interview with MIKE MOORE of TruePundit.com.
You can listen and simultaneously engage with lots of great people in the chat room at SHRMEDIA.COM.
Want to hear the truth about the Deep State, the FBI and other alphabet agencies — and more? Want to hear how your country really works? Want to find out what it’s like to be targeted by the US government and have your life ruined for political purposes?
Join BZ and Mike Moore TONIGHT, as we discuss Mr Moore’s book “PAINE: HOW WE DISMANTLED THE FBI IN OUR PAJAMAS.”
Listen to an exclusive interview with a man who paid a shockingly-high personal price in today’s tumultuous and chaotic political environment.
You are all graciously invited! Tell a friend!
BZ
P.S.
Thanks to Kari Baxter Donovan for all the arrangements with Mike Moore.
President Trump on Monday ordered the declassification of FISA court documents and Justice Department text messages related to the Russia probe.
The House and Senate intelligence committees have been seeking the FISA documents, warrant applications that could shed light on how the FBI in 2016 justified spying on Carter Page, a Trump campaign official.
He ordered the declassification of 19 pages of the application to the secret FISA court that approves surveillance on U.S. citizens, all FBI reports of interviews with Justice Department official Bruce G. Ohr prepared in connection with the Russia investigation, and all FBI reports of interviews prepared in connection with all FISA applications regarding Mr. Page.
Mr. Trump also directed the Department of Justice and FBI to publicly release all text messages relating to the Russia investigation from the key players in the genesis of the probe of Trump campaign collusion with the Kremlin.
Those players include former FBI Director James Comey, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, former FBI official Peter Strzok, former FBI lawyer Lisa Page and Mr. Ohr.
President Trump has decided, apparently, to meet a firestorm with one of his own, one that, I submit, is long overdue.
And here’s an interesting note. Is it due to the focus on FISA courts or is it because of a disinterest in working with the Trump administration? From ZDNet.com:
In Trump’s first year, FISA court denied record number of surveillance orders
by Zack Whittaker
More surveillance orders were denied during President Donald Trump’s first year in office than in the court’s history.
In its first year, the Trump administration kept one little-known courtroom in the capital busy.
A secretive Washington DC-based court that oversees the US government’s foreign spy programs denied more surveillance orders during President Donald Trump’s first year than in the court’s 40-year history, according to newly released figures.
Why would that be?
Annual data published Wednesday by the US Courts shows that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance (FISA) Court last year denied 26 applications in full, and 50 applications in part.
That’s compared to 21 orders between when the court was first formed in 1978 and President Barack Obama’s final year in office in 2016.
That’s a rejection rate of 0.11 percent to date.
Okay, why?
Specific reasons for the modifications were not given, but they can include changing who or what is surveilled and for what length.
Or is it simply a Deep State political reaction?
What you may not know is this: going to the FISA court customarily equated to a Grand Jury and a ham sandwich.
The summary: Robert Mueller as Special Counsel is providing criminal immunity to Tony Podesta, brother of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s chief campaign chairman in 2016, John Podesta (he was the one who came out election night to announce HRC would not be appearing to make her concession speech).
Let’s make it clear. Paul Manafort allegedly did the same thing that Tony Podesta did. Yet Podesta will potentially be receiving immunity from prosecution. Paul Manafort, not found guilty of any crime and not even having gone to court, is currently being held in solitary custody and not ADSEG.
That’s the finest example of completely indifference and non-bias on behalf of Robert Mueller that I can envision.
First, from TheHill.com. Please note the conspicuous absence of the names of those persons who will be granted immunity? Why would that be? Because the Muller team doesn’t want you to see Tony Podesta amongst those names.
Mueller seeking immunity for up to 5 people to testify in Manafort trial
by John Bowden
Attorneys working with special counsel Robert Mueller on Tuesday submitted a request for immunity for up to five witnesses his team has asked to testify in the trial against Paul Manafort, the former chairman of the Trump campaign.
Mueller made the request in a court filing Tuesday afternoon, which also requests that the identity of the potential witnesses remain under seal.
Information “escapes,” however, and of the escaping names is Tony Podesta.
“The five individuals identified in the motions at issue are third parties who have not been charged in this matter, and who have not been identified publicly with the case,” the filing reads. “Disclosing the motions would reveal those individuals’ involvement in the investigation and the trial, thereby creating the risk of their undue harassment.”
Why would there be “undue harassment” and from whom? Lord knows the harassment wouldn’t be from the American Media Maggots. They’d instead be cheering.
Note this:
Manafort is charged with money laundering and lobbying violations related to his work for pro-Russia parties in Ukraine prior to joining the Trump campaign. He has denied any wrongdoing and pleaded not guilty last year, but a former business associate, Richard Gates, has pleaded guilty to similar charges.
To make things even more specific, here’s an article from the WashingtonExaminer.com. Wait. The Hillloves leaks. Why didn’t we read of this leak covered by The Hill? Easy. Because The Hill leans Left. Why leak something that would further a point by your opposition? I certainly won’t believe that The Hill acquired a terrible, nausea-ridden, joint-aching case of The Ethics overnight. Nah.
Robert Mueller offers Tony Podesta immunity to testify against Paul Manafort: Report
by Daniel Chaitin
Tony Podesta, founder of the now-shuttered Podesta Group and brother to former Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, has been offered immunity by special counsel Robert Mueller to testify against former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort, according to a report.
Fox News’ Tucker Carlson announced on his show Thursday evening that two separate sources confirmed the offer.
“In other words, for a near identical crime, Bill and Hillary’s friend could escape and emerge completely unscathed while Paul Manafort may rot in jail. Only one of them made the mistake of chairing Donald Trump’s presidential campaign,” Carlson said.
Tucker Carlson:
For a near identical crime, Bill and Hillary’s friend could escape and emerge completely unscathed while Paul Manafort may rot in jail. Only one of them made the mistake of chairing Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.
The F.A.R.A. law was passed back in 1938 in order to prevent the government from lobbying in the U.S.,” Carlson explained. “Over a 50 year period from 1966 to 2015, a total of only seven people were criminally charged under F.A.R.A. Many more could have been charged — Washington is brimming with unregistered foreign agents and has been for decades. And yet only seven people were charged over 50 years. In recent months, three people have been charged under F.A.R.A. What do they have in common? You guessed it — some connection to Donald Trump.
The WashingtonExaminer.com wrote:
Manafort and Podesta’s firms worked together in a public relations campaign for the European Centre for a Modern Ukraine nonprofit, which was believed to be backed by the pro-Russian and oligarch-funded Ukrainian political group Party of Regions. Sources who spoke with NBC News in October said the Podesta Group became of significant interest because it may have violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act. FARA states Americans who lobby for foreign governments, leaders, or political parties must disclose their activities with the Justice Department.
Then:
The special counsel’s office declined to comment.
Of course they did.
Roger Stone indicated:
So.
Is the Mueller investigation biased?
Can there be any more clear an indication than what I’ve delineated?
This is partisan politics on steroids, fueled with meth, Swamp, Maker’s Mark, coitus, cheating, cuckolding, billions of dollars, corruption and the stench of fear.
Figure 1: The most arrogant, pompous, berating, snide, smug, self-righteous, biased and untrustworthy person recently displayed on US television. At least until another alphabet agency Deep State actor appears on US television.
Lisa Page ‘cooperative,’ ‘credible,’ lawmakers say after 5-hour closed-door session
by Amy Lieu
Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page was “cooperative” and “credible” in a closed-door session Friday with select House committee members that lasted nearly five hours.
U.S. Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., had been among Page’s harshest critics heading into the session, but he said her cooperation “speaks well of her,” according to the Hill.
Meadows said he thinks the American people “would be happy” with Friday’s transcribed interviews, the Washington Post reported.
“She’s been willing to help in the spirit of transparency. … We’ve certainly learned additional things today,” Meadows said.
That would certainly be in direct contravention of what little information the superior and keening Peter Strzok deigned to parse out on Wednesday past.
Page, who defied a subpoena Wednesday, would have been held in contempt of Congress had she not appeared at Friday’s session, lawmakers said.
In the private testimony, she primarily answered questions about text messages with Peter Strzok that allegedly showed bias against then-candidate Donald Trump, the New York Post reported.
Meadows called Page a “credible witness,” as he walked out of the hearing, the report said.
“There is new information,” he told reporters. “And that information is credible.”
Lisa Page was, let’s be blunt, nothing more than a stepping stone in a whirlwind of choices Peter Strzok had to make in the past few years. Lisa Page was possessed of a, well, a certain “mien” the likes of which Strzok apparently couldn’t otherwise acquire at home or else he wouldn’t have strayed. Common soldiers united in thought, deed, pillow biting and politics. Say, isn’t that a new Austrian industrial music group, Pillow Biting and Politics — Kissenbeißen und Politik? Or a new Angela Merkel call-in radio show?
You, of course, remember this as the infamous Peter Strzok/Lisa Page illicit liaison in 2016 (perhaps even farther back) of a married man and an unmarried woman.
Was Louis Gohmert correct in this tactic? I suggest that, yes, clearly, he was.
Let’s be honest. Robert Mueller wasn’t going to fire and replace Peter Strzok until the day that the DOJ — not Mueller or any of his group — brought certain problems to Mueller’s attention. Strzok was doing God’s work on the Mueller team in keeping with his theme of “against Trump by any means.” Mueller had the latitude but, sadly, lost a very devoted soldier but only because Strzok was, well, stupid. Had the texts not been revealed or perhaps not even created on FBI/taxpayer equipment on FBI/taxpayer time, Mueller would have continued to be the happy bivalve/mollusk packed in sand. “Bias? What bias?”
Bank on it.
So this is an “expert counterintelligence agent,” one who hangs his ass out in a potential honey pot scheme, opens himself to potential blackmail by opposing agents or forces, and then conducts his biased business essentially “in the clear” in today’s digital age? We’re supposed to trust this guy? And then add in all of his numerous and egregious examples of bias in the HRC investigation and the Trump/Russia investigation? In the eyes of Strzok and others like him, yes, we are that daft.
Let me ask those who believe Strzok’s documented written biases didn’t affect his thoughts, deeds or actions this question: let’s insert your name for Trump’s in all those text messages. Peter Strzok is subject to sitting on a jury where you are the defendant. Would you want him seated in the jury? I mean, after all, he insists he can be completely unbiased.
Further, former FBI Assistant Director Andrew McCabe has already said something similar to “if I’m going down, others are going down with me.” Or words to that effect, Senator. Heh.
Is Andrew McCabe the as-yet unacknowledged proverbial floater in the punchbowl?
Perhaps an incredibly important adjunct question is this: why is McCabe free and Manafort behind bars in solitary confinement?
TONIGHT, on BZ’s Berserk Bobcat Saloon Radio Show, there will be a very important SHR Media Special Report.
MIKE MOORE aka Thomas Paine @Thomas1774Paine, will be LIVE on BZ’s Berserk Bobcat Saloon Radio Show Tuesday night, October 30th, in order to talk about Moore’s new book PAINE: HOW WE DISMANTLED THE FBI IN OUR PAJAMAS.
Broadcasting at 11 PM Eastern, 8 PM Pacific, 10 PM Central, everyone is cordially invited to please join us for this landmark interview with MIKE MOORE of TruePundit.com.
From the 
President Trump has decided, apparently, to meet a firestorm with one of his own, one that, I submit, is long overdue.
But the iceberg is cracking.
Tom Fitton,
I don’t know. You tell me.
Further, former FBI Assistant Director Andrew McCabe has already said something similar to “if I’m going down, others are going down with me.” Or words to that effect, Senator. Heh.