Category Archives: Islam

Information revealed behind the video & maker alleged to be “responsible” for Middle East violence:

Posted on by

From YahooNews.com:

APNewsBreak: US identifies anti-Muslim filmmaker

WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal authorities have identified a Coptic Christian in southern California who is on probation after his conviction for financial crimes as the key figure behind the anti-Muslim film that ignited mob violence against U.S. embassies across the Mideast, a U.S. law enforcement official told The Associated Press on Thursday.

The official said authorities had concluded that Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, 55, was behind “Innocence of Muslims,” a film that denigrated Islam and the prophet Muhammad and sparked protests earlier this week in Egypt, Libya and most recently in Yemen. It was not immediately clear whether Nakoula was the target of a criminal investigation or part of the broader investigation into the deaths of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans in Libya during a terrorist attack.

A convenient dupe.

Here is what I found for a related video:

There is, of course, a very large HOWEVER:

This “however” includes the fact that the “video” — and here’s a novel suggestion — is nothing more than a convenient excuse for the kickoff of ubiquitous global violence instigated on 9/11 against Western institutions, buildings and locations.

If there were a series of violent revolutions in Detroit resulting from Michael Moore’s “Roger and Me,” would there be a subsequent excoriation of both Mr Moore and his film?

I might submit: not.

The “video” is a ruse.

Islam is, once again, at work against those GOWPs — Guilty Overeducated White People — who are sufficiently naive, guilty, glittered, ignorant, and representative of the bulk of Western Culture.

One small piece of positivism: Google refuses to pull the “suspect clip” against White House demands.

And here is the actual truth of these “riots.”

BZ

 

 

 Share

ESCALATION: Attacks and killings at US Embassies coordinated to 9/11

Posted on by

From Reuters:

(Reuters) – The U.S. ambassador to Libya and three embassy staff were killed in an attack on the Benghazi consulate and a safe house refuge, stormed by Islamist gunmen blaming America for a film they said insulted the Prophet Mohammad.

HOWEVER, from the New York Post:

TRIPOLI, Libya — US officials are increasingly suspicious that the murder Tuesday of the US ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens and three other American officials was not the result of a protest against an anti-Islam film, but instead was a coordinated terror strike timed for the 11th anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks.

It is no coincidence that the attacks were carried out on 9/11.  That said, the NYPost got the above caption WRONG.  I submit: Ambassador Stevens isn’t being “helped,” he’s being violently dragged through the streets.  Gateway Pundit concurs.

It is a political axiom that you respond to words with words, and you respond to actions with actions.

Mr Obama’s response?

President Obama strongly condemned the attacks, while also calling on embassies across the globe to increase security.

“Right now, the American people have the families of those we lost in our thoughts and prayers,” Obama said. “They exemplified America’s commitment to freedom, justice, and partnership with nations and people around the globe, and stand in stark contrast to those who callously took their lives.”

As I’ve said before, here is what Mr Obama does:

– He is concerned; and
– He is monitoring

I hope Mr Stevens’s family has excellent insurance, because he was sacrificed by the Obama Administration and the State Department in the game that Mr Obama foists on the global playing field.  You can rest assured that Mr Obama will only “monitor” with “concern.”

BZ

 

 

 Share

Muslims storm American embassies in Cairo and Benghazi; Obama and the State Department do nothing.

Posted on by

From Reuters:

(Reuters) – Egyptian protesters scaled the walls of the U.S. embassy on Tuesday, tore down the American flag and burned it during a protest over what they said was a film being produced in the United States that insulted Prophet Mohammad.

Scaling the walls and burning our American flag, replacing it with a black al Qaeda-type flag, as below:

From the UK Telegraph:

“At least four of them climbed over the embassy walls and tore down the American flag,” a witness said, adding that the demonstrators were angered by a film produced by expatriate members of Egypt’s Christian minority resident in the United States.

The demonstrators raised black flags inscribed with the Muslim profession of belief: “There is no God but God and Mohammed is the prophet of God.”

So what is the official reaction of the US Embassy — the US State Department — the United States of America?

Yes, of course: blame the so-called “film-makers” and not the Muslims who assaulted and occupied what is, by accord, considered to be sovereign US soil.  Here is the statement of US bureaucrats:

The U.S. embassy had put out a statement earlier on Tuesday condemning “misguided individuals” who hurt the religious feelings of Muslims or followers of other religions.

“We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others,” the U.S. embassy said in its statement.

The United States has now publicly apologized to Islam for the assault.

For those who think that — as the terrible Conservative that I am — I’m creating this reaction out of completely fabricated cloth, I say: here is the official US Embassy Cairo link, containing the full statement.

Officially, per the embassy, free speech is now “abuse.”  The reaction of Islam?  Here:

“If your freedom of speech has no limits, may you accept our freedom of action.”

There you have it.  Speech is the same, for Muslims, as violent action.

Additionally: I’m sure everyone has forgotten about the refusal of the Los Angeles Times in to release the 2003 tape it possesses of Mr Obama praising a Chicago professor who was a rabid advocate for the Palestine Liberation Organization while it was a designated terrorist group in the 1970s and ’80s.  Remember that?  I certainly do.

Here is the 2008 LATimes story.

What is Mr Obama’s “official” response today regarding the assault of our/his Cairo embassy and the storming/shooting at the US consulate in Benghazi, Libya, where “One American staff member has died and a number have been injured in the clashes,” Abdel-Monem Al-Hurr, spokesman for Libya’s Supreme Security Committee, told Reuters news agency. — ?

This.

But wait: it only gets better:

In the meantime, our “foreign policy president” (his campaign words), Mr Obama, refused to meet with Benyamin Netanyahu later this month, who will be in the US for two days only.  From Haaretz.com:

White House declines Netanyahu request to meet with Obama

The White House’s response marks a new low in relations between Netanyahu and Obama, underscored by the fact that this is the first time Netanyahu will visit the U.S. as prime minister without meeting Obama; PM to meet with Clinton

The White House declined Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s request on Tuesday to meet U.S. President Barack Obama during a UN conference in New York at the end of the month.

From CBSDC:

WASHINGTON (CBSDC/AP) — Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is making it clear that Israel will not wait to take out Iranian nuclear facilities.

In heated comments toward the United States, the Israeli prime minister said that it’s becoming clear that diplomacy will not work with Iran.

“The world tells Israel, `Wait. There’s still time,’” Netanyahu said Tuesday, according to The Associated Press. “And I say: `Wait for what? Wait until when?’ Those in the international community who refuse to put red lines before Iran don’t have a moral right to place a red light before Israel.”

“That which gets rewarded gets repeated.”  A political axiom.  And our president and his administration through any number of OFFICIAL venues are REWARDING violence against the United States and the discarding and curb-kicking of Israeli concerns.

How can any clear-thinking individual conclude anything other than: Mr Obama supports Islam and snubs Israel?

With that in mind, what’s a good Mullah to think?

BZ

 

 

 Share

Muslim Brotherhood to Egypt’s President Morsi: “Destroy the pyramids”

Posted on by


Because Muslims do not build and advance; they kill and destroy. And this is only in keeping with that ancient, time-tested trend. From FrontPageMag.com:

According to several reports in the Arabic media, prominent Muslim clerics have begun to call for the demolition of Egypt’s Great Pyramids—or, in the words of Saudi Sheikh Ali bin Said al-Rabi‘i, those “symbols of paganism,” which Egypt’s Salafi party has long planned to cover with wax. Most recently, Bahrain’s “Sheikh of Sunni Sheikhs” and President of National Unity, Abd al-Latif al-Mahmoud, called on Egypt’s new president, Muhammad Morsi, to “destroy the Pyramids and accomplish what the Sahabi Amr bin al-As could not.”

Currently, in what the International Criminal Court is describing as a possible “war crime,” Islamic fanatics are destroying the ancient heritage of the city of Timbuktu in Mali—all to Islam’s triumphant war cry, “Allahu Akbar!”

Much of this hate for their own pre-Islamic heritage is tied to the fact that, traditionally, Muslims do not identify with this or that nation, culture, heritage, or language, but only with the Islamic nation—the Umma.

Accordingly, while many Egyptians—Muslims and non-Muslims alike—see themselves as Egyptians, Islamists have no national identity, identifying only with Islam’s “culture,” based on the “sunna” of the prophet and Islam’s language, Arabic. This sentiment was clearly reflected when the former Leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, Muhammad Akef, declared “the hell with Egypt,” indicating that the interests of his country are secondary to Islam’s.

I once again proffer what history and time have managed to immure regarding the bulk of Islam as predominantly practiced in the Middle East: it is a religion of death, oppression, violence and misogyny, adhered-to by barbarians, the ignorant, the soft-brained, the tribal, the feudal, with this in primary mind:

Me against my brother, me and my brother against my cousins; me, my brother and my cousins against our nonrelatives; me, my brother, my cousins and friends against our enemies in the village; all of these and the whole village against the next village.”

And let us not forget taqqiyah.

This is already occurring in Britain:

From the UK MailOnline:

Islamic extremists have called on British Muslims to establish three independent states within the UK.

The notorious Muslims Against the Crusades (MAC) group have named Yorkshire towns Bradford and Dewsbury and Tower Hamlets in East London as testbeds for blanket sharia rule.

The medieval ’emirates’ would operate entirely outside British law, according to a document on the MAC website.

And did we ever think of this?

Egypt is about to be in control, under Muslim Brotherhood rule, of the Suez Canal.

Uh, no; not about to be. It is under “President” Morsi — a member of the Muslim Brotherhood himself. See above.

Let me get down to even more fundamental basics, the first aspect of which is widely-known to American soldiers serving in the Middle East:

Women are for procreation; men are for pleasure. The epitome of religious hypocrisy but — shhhh — don’t speak of the obvious.

And finally, as I’ve written for years: “Islam is as Islam does.”

Period.

BZ

P.S.
If you wish to see my prior take on Islam, go here.


If you’re female, Islam has some great plans for you. Unfortunately, most of them involve pain, violence, clitorectomies, subservience, honor killings, nose carvings and beatings.

Still interested? Sign up here.

 Share