Giuliani excoriated over Obama comment

Originally, ex-NY Mayor Rudy Giuliani said, via


NEW YORK — Rudy Giuliani went straight for the jugular Wednesday night during a private group dinner here featuring Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker by openly questioning whether President Barack Obama “loves America.”

“I do not believe, and I know this is a horrible thing to say, but I do not believe that the president loves America,” Giuliani said during the dinner at the 21 Club, a former Prohibition-era speakeasy in midtown Manhattan. “He doesn’t love you. And he doesn’t love me. He wasn’t brought up the way you were brought up and I was brought up through love of this country.”

I happen to completely agree with Giuliani’s diagnosis.  Particularly in light of Obama’s background and CV, which I delineated here.

That said, Mr Giuliani didn’t back down or retract his statement like most invertebrate GOP InvertebrateGOP members would.  He stood by his guns.  I also completely agree with his decision. There is only one reason for the actions of Barack Hussein Obama: to take this country down, because he believes it to be colonialistic, too strong, too powerful, too big for its own britches.  In Mr Obama’s world, the United States needs to be taken down a notch or three.  He’s just the man to do it.

And yes, Ann Coulter nails the situation, as indicated above.



Obama’s perfect Cloward-Piven Strategy:

Barack ObamaIt would seem that Mr Obama has finally revealed his true purpose:

To keep Demorats in control in perpetuity.

Cloward-PivenDo what I call the Logical Extension.

First, understand the Cloward-Piven Strategy.

With that under your belt, now read from the

Obama “Hopeful” Immigration Will Drown Conservatism

by Neil Munro

The spread of vibrant social diversity is constricting the GOP’s ability to champion conservative causes, such as smaller government and independent families, President Barack Obama said in a softball media interview.

“Over the long term, I’m pretty optimistic, and the reason is because this country just becomes more and more of a hodgepodge of folks,” Obama told Vox editor Ezra Klein.

Check where this is going.

“People are getting more and more comfortable with the diversity of this country, much more sophisticated about both the cultural differences but more importantly, the basic commonality that we have,” he said in his talk, which was recorded Jan 23.

But for Obama, “commonality” is a go-to euphemism for big, intrusive, nation-wide government by progressive experts.

The nation’s governors “all have a common interest, and that is making sure that their constituents — who are also my constituents — are able to gain opportunity, work hard, prosper, feel secure,” Obama said in a Dec. 5 comment about visiting governors. “That happens best when we work together, whether we’re talking about Democrats and Republicans and independents working together, or whether we’re talking about state, federal and local officials working together,” he said.


Free-market variety is contrary to a common purpose, Obama said Jan. 21. “Our media is all segmented now so that instead of just watching three stations, we got 600,” he said in an Idaho speech. “You got the [single] conservative station and the liberal stations. So everybody is only listening to what they already agree with. And then you’ve got political gerrymandering… so there are a lot of institutional forces that make it seem like we have nothing in common,” he said.

What does that mean to you?

To me it means: when the nation is consumed by a greater and greater number of illegal immigrants and by an increasing number of persons who will, in fact, vote themselves “largesse” (immigrants, of course, having the right to vote) because they find dependence on the government to be vividly attractive, then Conservatives and the GOP will have nothing to offer the population.

Meaning: the electorate will continue to vote, in perpetuity, for Free Cheese, thus eliminating any competition to Demorats.

Voila.  Mr Obama enables Cloward-Piven writ large over the entire nation.

A project being worked on with great vigor by Mr Barack Hussein Obama.



Obama The King says: “Extremist ideology” and “balkanization” of the media keep me from getting my way

Obama Imperial CloakedThis is King Obama brooking no dissent, no pushback, no differences, no disagreements, no discussions, no consideration of other points of view.

This is Obama The Imperial.


Obama: ‘Extremist Ideology’ That’s Taken Over GOP, ‘Balkanization of Media’ Has ‘Blocked’ My Agenda

by Matthew Boyle

President Barack Obama said the power of conservative opposition, including in the media, is blocking his agenda in an interview with New York Times columnist Tom Friedman late last week.

“What you’ve seen with our politics, partly because of gerrymandering, partly because of the Balkanization of media so people just watch what reinforces their deepest biases, partly because of big money in politics, is increasingly politicians are rewarded for taking the most extreme, maximalist positions,” Obama told the liberal Times columnist. “Sooner or later, that catches up with you. You end up not being able to move forward on things we need to move forward on. We need to reform our immigration system. That would be good not just for our domestic economy but for our position in the world. You travel around Latin America—nothing would more reinforce an admiration for the United States than us doing that. We need to rebuild our infrastructure. You go to the Singapore airport and then you come back to one of our airports and you say, huh? We’re not acting like a superpower.”

Given some of the policy issues he lists, especially immigration, Obama seems to be referring to the Tea Party in his comments about a faction in the GOP that has “blocked” his agenda by taking “extreme, maximalist positions.” Another way of looking at his remarks is a testament to the strength of the grassroots movement’s power.

An interesting final paragraph:

“This is a defining issue of our time,” [Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL)] Sessions said. “History books will write how much power President Obama grabbed and exercised if he’s not stopped and he goes through with this plan. So it’s a matter of constitutional order as well as a matter of important public policy. Just imagine if six million more people are legalized, how will anybody be deported? How will anybody be deterred from coming to the country unlawfully? It will amount to the collapse of law enforcement. I think the Senate has to confront this—and the American people need to know why is it that Harry Reid has been blocking votes. It has nothing to do with time. We spent days negotiating it to try to get a vote when we could have cast 20 votes. The reason is, he does not want his members to have to cast votes because it will expose their position. They’re saying things in their states that are different than what they’re voting for in the Senate—or avoiding voting for.”

Illegal invasion grates on me for any number of reasons, not the least of which is the flaunting of American laws.  We are a nation of laws allegedly equally applied — except that they are not.  Both the federal government and illegal invaders are picking and choosing which laws they wish to obey, and which laws they wish to disregard.

Can you imagine the hue and cry if I — and many, many others like me — were to pick and choose which laws we wished to obey with an equally cavalier amount of disdain?

The unrestrained flood of illegal invaders is a nation-changing event.  These are people who, now, are uninterested in assimilating, in speaking English, in paying taxes, in becoming part of the American culture.  They wish to stay in their enclaves, speaking their native languages, and expecting that their whims will be catered to.

And their whims include free medical, free tuition to universities, priority over others.  And that is wrong.

As I found in a Union Pacific locomotive a few years ago:

Govt Big Enuff“Extremist ideology”?  The “Balkanization” of the American Media Maggots?

Frankly, I don’t believe it for a second.  The AMM continue to be “in the tank” for Obama, doing their level best to carry his water — and they plan to do it for the full eight years.

And dissension?  Let’s have a review of “dissent” from Shrillary Rodham Clinton, shall we?  She says it is patriotic to disagree.

Except that, apparently, it is NOT patriotic to disagree with Mr Obama.

Instead, disagreement is declared as racist.

Mr Obama simply wants his way, and if he doesn’t get it:

Democrat Party Seal - Baby CryingBZ

Obama truly believes: America does more harm than good.



So, Mr Obama IS a LIAR and YOU just became his DUPE: “WH: ‘It’s True’ Some Americans Won’t Be Able to Keep Their Health Care Plan Under Obamacare”

From The Weekly Standard:

White House spokesman Jay Carney explained at today’s briefing that “it’s true” some Americans will not be able to keep their health care plan under Obamacare:

As immured here forever via YouTube — and note that Jay Carney is the sacrificial lamb, not Mr Obama himself:

Again, I repeat for the dullards and mental mutants who voted for Barack Hussein Obama because “he’s gonna pay for my gas and my mortgage”:

Of course he will.  He promised.  Then you voted for him.  Then he placed his specially-sharpened knife from the Spite House directly into your back.  For regular American Taxpayers, he utilized his even more customized Deeper Spite House Stiletto, guaranteed to bleed you more effectively and with a greater tax yield.

I have but one question for Mr Carney: just what was it about the following series of clips that were unclear to yourself and the entire nation?  How did Mr Obama equivocate?  It all seems rather clear to me:

And let me emphasize: Mr Obama didn’t just make that statement once.  He made it, as documented above, numerous times in numerous venues.

America, the lot of you are brain-glazingly ignorant.  But for those who are not Parasitic Free Cheese robots and fall into the category of regular American Taxpayers:

You have no idea how you about to be fleeced further.

Let the bloodletting commence.




Obama administration using housing department in effort to diversify neighborhoods

Social EngineeringFrom

In a move some claim is tantamount to social engineering, the Department of Housing and Urban Development is imposing a new rule that would allow the feds to track diversity in America’s neighborhoods and then push policies to change those it deems discriminatory. 

The policy is called, “Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing.” It will require HUD to gather data on segregation and discrimination in every single neighborhood and try to remedy it.

HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan unveiled the federal rule at the NAACP convention in July.

What?  “Social engineering” in the Obama Administration?  I find that simply difficult to believe.

Data from this discrimination database would be used with zoning laws, housing finance policy, infrastructure planning and transportation to alleviate alleged discrimination and segregation.

Please note the operative word in the above sentence: “alleged.”

And sanity weighs in for just a brief moment:

“This is just the latest of a series of attempts by HUD to social engineer the American people,” said Ed Pinto, of the American Enterprise Institute. “It started with public housing and urban renewal, which failed spectacularly back in the 50’s and 60’s. They tried it again in the 90’s when they wanted to transform house finance, do away with down payments, and the result was millions of foreclosures and financial collapse.”

Some fear the rule will open the floodgates to lawsuits by HUD —  a weapon the department has already used  in places like Westchester County, N.Y., where mayors and attorneys representing several towns, like Cortlandt, are writing HUD to protest burdensome fair housing mandates that go far beyond those agreed to in a 2009 settlement with HUD.

Wait.  This wouldn’t punish people like, say, the ADA has punished businesses small and large for years, becoming the proverbial cash cow for tort lawyers — would it?

Potentially the most disturbing paragraph in the entire article:

Also troublesome to critics is that the HUD secretary, in announcing this proposed rule, blamed poverty on zip codes – rather than other socio-economic factors that studies have shown contribute to poverty.

Right.  Zip codes are to blame.