The FIX in Phoenix

Posted on by

Democrat LIES via Bill and Hill and LorettaThe fix is in.

To what am I referencing, you may ask?  Please read this, from ABC15 in Phoenix, which reports:

US Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Bill Clinton meet privately in Phoenix before Benghazi report

by Christopher Sign

PHOENIX – Amid an ongoing investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of email and hours before the public release of the Benghazi report, US Attorney General Loretta Lynch met privately with former President Bill Clinton.

The private meeting took place on the west side of Sky Harbor International Airport on board a parked private plane.

Former President Clinton was visiting the Phoenix area and arrived to Sky Harbor Monday evening to depart.

Sources tell ABC15 Clinton was notified Lynch would be arriving at the airport soon and waited for her arrival.

Let us now do what I call the Logical Extension.  Nothing with regard to American politics occurs in a vacuum.  And Bill Clinton is not only not stupid but he does not operate in a political vacuum.  If there were someone who is cooly, calmly cogitating with regard to politics, it is William Jefferson Clinton.  William Jefferson Clinton exists to fill vacuums.

Translated: Clinton waited for Lynch’s arrival for a very specific reason.  William Jefferson Clinton does not waste time because time is money.  Money.  Because only two items motivate the Clintons:  1) Money, and 2) Power.  Unlike Frank Underwood, the Clinton’s Juggernaut has acquired the point where money and power are roughly equal in their lust.

The meeting was simply coincidental and involved only brusque mandatory pleasantries with regard to grandchildren and such.  Because it was 106-degrees in Phoenix that day and likely 112-degrees on the tarmac.  Because William Jefferson Clinton is customarily motivated by like pleasantries with other Demorats.  When they happen to share private jets at congruent airports.

Despite the fact that William Jefferson Clinton had to deplane his own personal private jet in order to step into the personal private jet of Loretta Elizabeth Lynch.

Yes.  Your tax dollars at work.

Oh wait.  Demorats that William Jefferson Clinton happened to appoint to particular posts.  Oh wait.  Like Loretta Elizabeth Lynch.being nominated In 1999 by William Jefferson Clinton to be US Attorney for the Eastern District of New York?  Yes, like that.

Lynch was arriving in Phoenix for a planned visit as part of her national tour to promote community policing.

ABC15 asked Lynch about the meeting during her news conference at the Phoenix Police Department.

“I did see President Clinton at the Phoenix airport as he was leaving and spoke to myself and my husband on the plane,” said Lynch.

The private meeting comes as Lynch’s office is in charge of the ongoing investigation and potential charges involving Clinton’s email server.

The private meeting also occurred hours before the Benghazi report was released publicly involving Hillary Clinton and President Obama’s administration.

But, wait.

Didn’t press secretary, Josh Earnest, unequivocally state that the investigation of Hillary Clinton would be “free of political influence” and that he would leave it to the attorney general to explain the meeting?

He did.

So what occurred in their thirty-minute very private meeting with no one else around?  Exchanged photos of grandchildren?  Talk about the next season of Game of Thrones?  I suspect not.

I suspect the convo went something like this:

Bill: “You know, Rhett, remember that candy I gave you back in 1999?  I think I could use a little candy in return, but not for me.  For my wife.  Everyone sure loves Hillary.  It would be a shame if she lost the presidency because people thought she was gonna be prosecuted.”

Rhett: “Maybe I can do something about that.”

Bill: “Well Rhett, we sure would be appreciative.  And I bet the Democrats would be appreciative too, her being the first female president and all.  Everybody sure loves Hillary.  And you know, being a Senator has better health benefits, if you’d be interested.”

Never mind about the “optics” of the incident.  The American Media Maggots will do their level best to tamp it down and sweep it under the rug.  Conflict of interest?  Truly, who cares?

What do you think would occur if the roles were reversed?  What if the players involved were all Republicans and this meeting occurred?  The AMM would be on this story for weeks and it would be front page news for that amount of time.

PLUS:

From HotAir.com:

Reporter: FBI ordered ‘no photos, no pictures, no cell phones’ during Clinton/Lynch meeting

by Larry O/Connor

Reporter Christopher Sign of ABC 15 in Phoenix, AZ appeared on The O’Reilly Factor Thursday night to talk about his scoop involving that secret meeting between former President Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

“The former president steps into her plane. They then speak for 30 minutes privately. The FBI there on the tarmac instructing everybody around ‘no photos, no pictures, no cell phones.’”

First of all, it isn’t the FBI’s job to tell journalists or private citizens they can’t take photographs of a former president and the Attorney General. What were the agents going to do, arrest people for taking a picture or video?

Also, if there was nothing wrong with the meeting and it was totally innocent, why were federal agents instructed to demand no one take a picture?

PRECISELY.

At the VERY least, Lynch should recuse herself from the matter and appoint a special prosecutor.  At the worst she should be fired and then an investigation opened on her corruption.

After all, I’m sure that Bill and Rhett only talked about their grandkids, right?

I only ask:

Is there one — just one attorney in the DOJ — who is not corrupt?

And can, moreover, take a stand and publicly state that he or she is not broken in the face of rampant agency misconduct and fraudulence?

Right.

I thought not.

BZ

 

 Share

Leftists: dissension must be ELIMINATED

Posted on by

Leftists DON'T ALLOW DISSENSIONFirst on the agenda: the Drudge Report (though it’s nothing more than an aggregator) and Fox News.  Then the entire internet.

EXAMPLE ONE:

First, from the WashingtonExaminer.com:

Fox targeted by FEC Dems in first-ever vote to punish debate sponsorship

by Paul Bedard

Finally making good on long-harbored anger at conservative media, Democrats on the Federal Election Commission voted in secret to punish Fox News’ sponsorship of a Republican presidential debate, using an obscure law to charge the network with helping those on stage.

STOP.  Read that first sentence again: “Finally making good on LONG-HARBORED ANGER at CONSERVATIVE media, DEMOCRATS on the Federal Election Commission voted in SECRET to PUNISH Fox News’ sponsorship of a Republican presidential debate, USING AN OBSCURE LAW to charge the network with helping those on stage.”

Would that not be unlike Lois Lerner and the IRS who complained bitterly that no such thing was done until finally the IRS admitted that precisely that thing was done?

It is the first time in history that members of the FEC voted to punish a media outlet’s debate sponsorship, and it follows several years of Democratic threats against conservative media and websites like the Drudge Report.

The punishment, however, was blocked by all three Republicans on the commission, resulting in a 3-3 tie vote and no action. The vote was posted Thursday and is here.

Imagine the results had Demorats simply owned that board, as Demorats own the state of California on most every level?

It seems that CNN sponsored quite a number of Democrat debates.  CNN sponsored four Democrat debates, of the ten documented — that’s almost half.  The GOP had twelve debates, six of which were sponsored by Fox.  That also is half.  Any issue with the FEC?

Here’s the obvious kicker:

CNN did the same thing, but there is no indication that they faced a complaint.

Do not think that the Demorats and Leftists are content to stop there.  They absolutely, incontrovertibly, wish to control the entire internet and all its content — particularly if that content is right-leaning in nature.

EXAMPLE TWO:

Also from the WashingtonExaminer.com:

Federal regulation of Internet coming, warn FCC, FEC commissioners

by Paul Bedard

Democrats targeting content and control of the Internet, especially from conservative sources, are pushing hard to layer on new regulations and even censorship under the guise of promoting diversity while policing bullying, warn commissioners from the Federal Communications Commission and Federal Election Commission.

“Protecting freedom on the Internet is just one vote away,” said Lee E. Goodman, a commissioner on the FEC which is divided three Democrats to three Republicans. “There is a cloud over your free speech.”

What is diversity?  In the eyes of Leftists, it is a One World Barbeque — that is, all persons saying, writing and thinking the same: a Leftist fashion.  Dissension cannot be tolerated.  What the FEC and Leftists and Demorats want is the same freedom of speech one now customarily finds on college campuses in America today; that is, little to none.

BZ License To BlogIn this vein I wrote, many years ago in 2010, that I could foresee the time where I as a blogger would require a literal license to blog.  To express my opinions and feelings.

Freedom of speech on the Internet, added Ajit Pai, commissioner of the Federal Communications Commission, “is increasingly under threat.”

Pai and Goodman cited political correctness campaigns by Democrats as a threat. Both also said their agencies are becoming politicized and the liberals are using their power to push regulations that impact business and conservative outlets and voices.

Of course it’s under threat.  Leftists and Demorat want absolute control of speech as well as most every other aspect of your life.  With a SCOTUS that leans far left as would occur under the lying and brazenly-corrupt Hillary Clinton, you can quite certainly wave good-bye to your Bill of Rights, with the Second and First Amendments primarily in their PC sights.

“One of the things that is critical for this country is to reassert the value of the First Amendment, the fact that robust discourse, that is sometimes cacophonous, is nonetheless a value, in fact it creates value,” said Pai.

But wait; perhaps you thought I was kidding with the whole “my blog will be involved as will yours” thingie?  Read on.

At a CATO Institute discussion on online speech Wednesday night, both said that regulators are eager to issue new rules that could put limits on what people could say on blogs, online news and even YouTube. Washington Examiner reporter Rudy Takala and Cato’s digital manager Kat Murti were also on the panel.

There it is in black and white.  Do not for a moment believe that, somehow, miraculously, you will remain unaffected — particularly if you are a Conservative.  Or a Libertarian for that matter — John Stossel, I’m looking at you, sir.

Pai, addressing Goodman, added, “The common thread of our experiences I think is this impulse of control, whether it’s the FCC and the impulse of the government to want to control how these networks operate, and the FEC to control the content of the traffic that traverses over those networks, and I think that certainly highlights the importance of the First Amendment.”

Goodman concluded, “We need to be ever mindful and vigilant not to let governmental agencies through 3-2 votes, or 4-2 votes at the FEC take that away from us.”

Let there be no mistake.  Leftists and Demorats want control of our lives, complete and utter control of what we do, what we eat, where we live, how we live our lives and ultimately what we write, say and even think.

Leftists and Demorats would truly be pleased with a 1984 environment.

1984 - Big BrotherI can see an upheaval coming, ladies and gentlemen, if Demorats and Leftists keep removing our rights and our freedoms.

BZ

IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

 Share

EU doubles down: Brussels wants a dictatorship

Posted on by

Brexit Many RanguagesBecause everyone thinks they can “do” Socialism better than the last guy.

Not like Obaka isn’t trying.

Obama Dictatorship SupremeJust ask Lenin or Stalin or Chavez or Castro or Mao or Maduro.  There’s a lot to be said for a diktat.  It simplifies a lot of things.  “Streamlining,” you might say.

Why don’t we just let British media explain things right off the bat?

From the UKExpress:

European SUPERSTATE to be unveiled: EU nations ‘to be morphed into one’ post-Brexit

by Nick Gutteridge

EUROPEAN political chiefs are to take advantage of Brexit by unveiling their long-held plan to morph the continent’s countries into one GIANT SUPERSTATE, it has emerged today.

The foreign ministers of France and Germany are due to reveal a blueprint to effectively do away with individual member states in what is being described as an “ultimatum”. 

Right.

An ultimatum because those in favor of REMAIN cheated and, despite that, lost at the polls.  Their first thought — following the shock of it all — was to nullify the vote.  They didn’t get their way.  That can’t happen.  They are Leftists.  The proles, the groundlings, the serfs, the pawns, the unwashed, the uneducated, they must obey.  “Too many ignorant people in the UK.  We need to push their votes aside and do what we, the parliament, know is best for those brain-dead Britons who voted for Brexit.”

In other words: to hell with you dimwit voters.

Brexit Londoner NOT AncientBecause, after all, those persons silly enough to vote for Brexit were clearly uneducated.

Brexit Leftist EducationOr perhaps they consisted of those who were actually thinking human beings and respected the right of cultures and countries to exist on their own?

Nah.  Racist, sexist, xenophobic, anti-immigrant, anti-Elitist, anti-Socialist, anti-Globalist, anti-Leftist.

But — oh my — it so gets better:

Controversially member states would also lose what few controls they have left over their own borders, including the procedure for admitting and relocating refugees. 

The plot has sparked fury and panic in Poland – a traditional ally of Britain in the fight against federalism – after being leaked to Polish news channel TVP Info. 

Listen:

Under the radical proposals, EU countries will lose the right to have their own army, criminal law, taxation system or central bank, with all those powers being transferred to Brussels. 

Turning all power over to Brussels, Belgium.  Repeat: all.  Sufficiently onerous for you yet?

But others see the Brexit vote as an opportunity to push ahead with the European elite’s long-cherished dream of creating a United States of Europe.

Spain’s foreign minister Jose Manuel Garcia-Margallo has called for “more Europe” whilst Italy’s finance minister, Carlo Padoan, is advocating a common budget for the eurozone states. 

Precisely.  A “United States of Europe” where they can finally put their boot-heels to that upstart US child.

Finally:

And Emmanuel Macron, France’s economy minister, wants to go even further and set up a common eurozone treasury which would oversee the permanent transfer of funds from wealthier northern Europe to shore up Mediterranean economies. 

There; the cat is out of the bag.  Euro Elitists want that forced transfer of wealth from the “greedy, evil Big States like Germany” to the poor needy states like Greece — who make execrable decisions, grant little if any input to the kitty, but want to take as much as possible from the central till.

You know it by the name of Socialism.

And it is unsustainable.  Just peek at Venezuela.

Let me say this again, Euro Elitist Leftists: people voted to opt out of the EU because Britons saw their country disintegrating before their very eyes.  They saw their culture — and make no mistake, the British indeed have a clear and lengthy culture — crumbling outside their doors.  They saw their values and mores being overshadowed by everyone and everything un-British.

Then they said: enough.

Brexit SwexitOverall, bad news for the European Union:

The EU should regard the referendum result as a wake-up call. Discontent with how the bloc operates isn’t restricted to Britain. A survey of more than 10,000 voters across Europe published by the Pew Research Center earlier this month showed rising dissatisfaction. The proportion of French respondents with a favorable view of the EU, for example, slumped to 38 percent from 69 percent in 2004; in Spain the deterioration was to 47 percent from 80 percent.

BZ

P.S.
If the Brits have “Brexit,” then how about Departugal?  Italeave?  Fruckoff?  Czechout?  Oustria?  Finish?  Slovlong?  Latervia?  Byegium?  Leaving only Germlonely?

By the way, two excellent articles on the Brexit here and here.

 

 Share

UK Leftists CHEAT on Brexit, then want to dismiss results

Posted on by

Brexit Queen BacksTrue to form with Leftists the globe over, first they cheated at the Brexit vote and, now, not having gotten their way, simply want to dismiss the vote altogether.

Perfect.

Why vote?  Why waste your time, when the Leftist Elitist Ruling Class will do as it pleases with little pushback from media?

First, the cheating, from BreitbartUK:

Brexit CHEATERS3M+ ‘Remain’ Petition Uses ‘Script’ To ‘Fake’ Signatures: 25,000 From North Korea, 2,800 From Uninhabitable Antarctic

by Raheem Kassam

Questions are being raised as to the true number of UK citizens signing a petition to urge another European Union membership referendum as evidence emerged that activists are encouraging foreign signatories. Some critics claim that a “bot” or “script” is being used to automatically generate names and signatories.

As of early Sunday afternoon, over 3.1 million signatures had been registered on the petition named: “EU Referendum Rules triggering a 2nd EU Referendum” which calls for the “Government to implement a rule that if the remain or leave vote is less than 60% based a turnout less than 75% there should be another referendum.”

But an analysis of the data on the petition shows that at least 6 per cent of the signatories, or nearly 200,000 are from foreign countries. While foreign-based UK nationals are allowed to sign UK petitions, some believe that many of these are fraudulent given that Remain activists are handing out post codes online in order to elicit more signatures from abroad.

When abject cheating happened to fail, an outright overturning of the people’s vote is next up from the Leftist Playbook.  FoxNews.com writes:

Brexit remorse? UK lawmaker calls for Parliament to ignore EU referendum

The aftershocks of Thursday’s referendum on British membership in the European Union continued to reverberate Saturday with one lawmaker saying Parliament should overturn the result.

Voters in England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Gibraltar opted to leave the 28-nation bloc by the relatively narrow margin of 1.2 million votes out of more than 33 million cast. The result revealed deep regional and generational divides in the United Kingdom, with young voters, London and Scotland overwhelmingly voting “Remain.” By contrast, older voters, the rest of England and Wales voted “Leave” by similary large margins.

It initially appeared that many voters quickly developed buyer’s remorse after the vote, with more than 2 million people apparently signing an online petition calling for a second referendum to be held. But it was revealed Sunday that many of those signatures were faked, with hackers from Anonymous and the online community 4 Chan likely responsible, Heat Street reported.

See the first article, above.

What to do, then?  Ignore it all.  Tear it down.  “Too many ignorant people in the UK.  We need to push their votes aside and do what we, the parliament, know is best for those brain-dead Britons who voted for Brexit.”

Once again, Leftists insisting they know better than anyone else what is better for you, including you.

If they cheat and can’t win, then wish to cancel the results in any event, I have but one question:

Why make a pretense, Leftists?  Why should the populace be allowed to vote at all?

As far as you’re concerned, you’d simply prefer to rule by diktat.

BZ

 

 Share