Loretta Lynch obstructed justice and must be investigated

Are those legs or are those pier pilings to which eastern cod trawlers should tie up?

It is clear that the Demorats are working in concert with embedded deep state undermining civilian operators along with GOP EstabliHacks in order to create a cavernous and extensive coalition crossing aisles whose goal is to ultimately impeach and remove President Donald Trump.

You know. The person lawfully elected by the people of the United States of America. The guy with the dead orange cat on his head.

For the GOP, you have to ask yourselves why.

Perhaps Judge Pirro knows why.

Good points, all. Where are they indeed? Hiding, hoarding their gold on the table, their collective arms around it, ensuring their money and — mostly — their inherent power is not disturbed in the slightest. Oval office holders may come and go but Entrenched Power prevails. It must not be disturbed or distressed on either side of the aisle. Verboten.

Where were they in re James Comey? Conspicuously silent?

Former FBI Director James Comey testified just last week, Thursday, June 8th — how far and long ago that now seems — that Loretta Lynch compromised him. And you. And me. And the investigation into Hillary Clinton. Let us refresh.

We know now, because of this testimony, that Loretta Lynch herself in the Barack Obama administration attempted to obstruct justice and deflect or remove the serious status of the Hillary Clinton email investigation. Minimization. Further, James Comey went along with it.

Let’s go back, shall we, to a certain tete-a-tete between Loretta Lynch and Jason Chaffetz in which Lorette Lynch decided to

“You refused to answer 74 times.”

“Your refusal to answer.”

Perhaps a wee bit-o-history of refusal and obfuscation? No, nothing like that.

Then let us away with Trey Gowdy.

Warte mal. 

Are you starting to witness something of a trend here?

A trend completely ignored, and purposely so, by the Demorats and the American Media Maggots and, to an extent, the EstabliHacks of the GOP, with a select few exceptions?

I have set my background. Now it is time to reveal more from Circa.com.

Comey got ‘steely silence’ after confronting Loretta Lynch about Clinton’s email probe

by John Solomon and Sara A. Carter

Ex-FBI Director James Comey has privately told members of Congress that he had a frosty exchange with Obama Attorney General Loretta Lynch last year when he confronted her about possible political interference in the Hillary Clinton email investigation after showing Lynch a sensitive document she was unaware the FBI possessed, according to sources who were directly briefed on the matter.

During his testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee last Thursday, Comey alluded to the exchange after publicly discussing an encounter with Lynch, where she ordered him not to refer to the criminal probe of Clinton’ handling of classified emails not as an “investigation” but rather as a “matter.” He suggested it smacked of political spin rather than the way professional law enforcement officers talk.

Buttery goodness? But wait, there’s more.

In multiple private sessions over the last few months, Comey has told lawmakers about a second, later confrontation with Lynch shortly before the email probe was shut down.

Really? That hadn’t been plastered near and far by the American Media Maggots. Why might that be?

Comey told lawmakers in the closed door session that he raised his concern with the attorney general that she had created a conflict of interest by meeting with Clinton’s husband, the former President Bill Clinton, on an airport tarmac while the investigation was ongoing.

During the conversation, Comey told lawmakers he confronted Lynch with a highly sensitive piece of evidence, a communication between two political figures that suggested Lynch had agreed to put the kibosh on any prosecution of Clinton.

At minimum a conflict of interest — the likes of which, truly, Comey had no interest considering his approval of Assistant FBI Director McCabe’s direct involvement with Demorat partisan politics on behalf of McCabe’s clearly partisan Demorat wife, Jill. Comey ruled the conflict wasn’t just regular cool, but that it was extra crispy cool. Nothing to see here. Move on. Dot org.

Comey said “the attorney general looked at the document then looked up with a steely silence that lasted for some time, then asked him if he had any other business with her and if not that he should leave her office,” said one source who was briefed.

Bing. Done. Gone. Leave. Vacate.

Comey “took that interaction and the fact she had met with Bill Clinton as enough reason to decide he would not allow the Justice Department to decide the fate of the case and instead would go public” with his own assessment that the FBI could not prove Mrs. Clinton intended to violate the law when she transmitted classified information through her private email and therefore should not be criminally charged. Another source said the “tarmac meeting was the public excuse for not going to Lynch when all along there was other evidence that was more concerning to Comey.”

In other words, politics trumped the truth and the need for Comey to insert himself as something of a Knight In Shining Armor. A fantasy that had been brewing in his fetid, knurled, convoluted and twisted mind for years.

Are Senate Republicans are finally starting to get the message?

Senate Republicans Hope to Question Loretta Lynch on Conduct in Clinton Email Case

by Aaron Klein

NEW YORK — Senate Republicans are eying the possibility of seeking testimony from former Attorney General Loretta Lynch over possible wrongdoing with regard to the FBI’s criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails.

On Wednesday, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) sent a letter to Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA), the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, formally requesting that the committee probe any attempts to influence the FBI’s investigations under the Trump and Obama administrations.

There are three important issues that should logically require the testimony of Lynch.

One is Lynch’s infamous tarmac meeting last June at the Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport in which former President Bill Clinton, the husband of the FBI’s main subject in a criminal probe — Hillary’s email case — boarded the attorney general’s plane and reportedly stayed there for about thirty minutes for a private chat.

The second concern is Lynch’s reported directive for then-FBI Director James Comey to publically refer to the FBI’s criminal investigation into Clinton’s email as a “matter” instead of an investigation or a criminal probe. The language matched the specific rhetoric used at the time by Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, which referred to the criminal investigation as a “matter.”

The third issue relates to testimony and questions surrounding reports claiming that Comey was in possession of a document purportedly indicating that Lynch would ensure the Clinton email probe didn’t go too far.

Even the politically-biased James Comey — ex FBI Director, thank God —  said the “Justice Department leadership could not credibly complete the investigation and declined prosecution without grievous damage to the American people’s confidence in the — in the justice system.”

Judge Andrew Napolitano rightly asks: where are we now?

The Demorats are making these times all about process, as I say, and not about governing. Republicans are buying into it. Republicans appear to willingly be ceding the power they truly possess.




State Dept stabs Trump by increasing flow of “refugees” to US

More proof that the tick-like embedded Obama-Obedient Deep State Loyalistas continue to subvert, undermine, compromise, diminish, impair and sabotage the presidency of Donald Trump, who won his spot not by imperial fiat but by playing according to the rules.

Leftists at the Department of State hate that. They hate his policies. They’ve already said so. They want more “refugees,” not fewer.

From Breitbart.com:

Report: Trump Administration to Nearly Double Rate of Refugee Admissions for Balance of FY 2017

by Michael Patrick Leahy

The New York Timesis reporting that the State Department will nearly double the rate of refugee admissions to the United States for the balance of FY 2017, from the current rate of 830 per week to 1,500 per week.

Of course, that’s at the behest of President Trump, right?

“Despite repeated efforts by President Trump to curtail refugee resettlements, the State Department this week quietly lifted the department’s restriction on the number of refugees allowed to enter the United States,” the Times reported on Friday.

The result could be a near doubling of refugees entering the country, from about 830 people a week in the first three weeks of this month to well over 1,500 people per week by next month, according to refugee advocates. Tens of thousands of refugees are waiting to come to the United States.

The State Department’s decision was conveyed in an email on Thursday to the private agencies in countries around the world that help refugees manage the nearly two-year application process needed to enter the United States.

In her email, Jennifer L. Smith, a department official, wrote that the refugee groups could begin bringing people to the United States “unconstrained by the weekly quotas that were in place.”

Uh-oh. Maybe not conducted on behalf of the President of the United States, one Donald John Trump.

It is unclear if the State Department made this upward adjustment with the knowledge and approval of President Trump. The Department of Justice, however, was apparently consulted.

Really? Just who within the DOJ? Was it from the top via Attorney General Jeff Sessions? No one seems yet to know.

“A State Department spokeswoman, speaking on the condition of anonymity because she was not authorized to discuss the issue publicly, said the department had consulted the Department of Justice about its refugee quotas and had decided to adjust them,” the Times reported.

Again: who was “consulted”? Did this alleged “consultation” go right into the office of the AG himself? Did it somehow wend its way into the White House? Shock of shocks, I suspect not.

As of May 24, 45,533 refugees have been admitted to the United States in FY 2017, which began on October 1, 2016. Earlier this week, Breitbart News estimated that if the refugee entry rate continued at the level of 817 per week (the rate of the four most recent weeks), the total number of refugees admitted to the United States in FY 2017 by September 30 would be 60,672.

Do we even know where our current bulk of refugees are or where they went? How many entered? How many visa overstays? Of course we don’t because the Obama administration didn’t care and, more pointedly, didn’t want to know.

Stop. Let’s look at the numbers. I’ll wager you had no idea this great a flood was occurring right under our very noses. That’s 45,000 “refugees” into the US before the end of the 2017 federal fiscal year.

What is a federal fiscal year? Every FFY starts on October 1st and runs to the last day of September. Translated: there’s still a lot of FY 2017 remaining.

You want stats? Costs? How about this, where Rep. Scott DesJarlais speaks to Department of Homeland Security and State Department officials over the dangers of allowing refugees from Syria into the United States without the ability to properly vet them, including their likely terror ties.

Let’s also consult further statistics. From PewResearch.org:

A total of 38,901 Muslim refugees entered the U.S. in fiscal year 2016, making up almost half (46%) of the nearly 85,000 refugees who entered the country in that period, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of data from the State Department’s Refugee Processing Center. That means the U.S. has admitted the highest number of Muslim refugees of any year since data on self-reported religious affiliations first became publicly available in 2002.

Your State Department wants more.

Opponents of the federal refugee resettlement program vigorously criticized the reported change in the Trump administration’s refugee admissions policy for FY 2017.

“Stunning news: Trump State Department opens the flood gates, refugee admissions will explode in coming weeks,” Ann Corcoran wrote at Refugee Resettlement Watch on Saturday.

“Betraying the voters who elected Donald Trump, the Department of State slipped the news to the contractors on Thursday who then slipped the news to the New York Times just as you were packing up for the beach or getting ready for a family barbecue using the federal government’s favorite holiday weekend trick to bury the news,” Corcoran added.

But wait. Muslims vs Christians? Sorry. Christians lose. Even Newsweek.com admits:


by Elliott Abrams

The headline for this column—The U.S. Bars Christian, Not Muslim, Refugees From Syria—will strike many readers as ridiculous.

But the numbers tell a different story: The United States has accepted 10,801 Syrian refugees, of whom 56 are Christian. Not 56 percent; 56 total, out of 10,801. That is to say, one-half of 1 percent.

One half of one percent. Oddly enough, that corresponds to the number of transgender persons in the US, the likes for which we must turn our society upside-down.

We’ll go to bat for transgenders but Christians can go to hell in their minority numbers?

The Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration, the administrative part of the State Department that manages the inflow of refugees to the United States, continues to be run by holdovers from the Obama administration.

What a shock. I’m shocked. I’m sure you’re equally shocked. State Department underminers are still back at this:

  • Rigged primaries = FAILED;
  • Rigged debates = FAILED;
  • Rigged general = FAILED;
  • Rigged AMM = FAILED;
  • Rigged FBI = FAILED;
  • Rigged recount = FAILED;
  • Rigged “fake news” = FAILED;
  • Rigged “Russia hackers” = FAILED;
  • Rigged “Hamilton Electors” = FAILED.

What’s left? To undermine from the inside at the DOS. They have an agenda and they have made no bones about it.

Then this from CounterJihadReport.com:

Stunning news: Trump State Department opens the flood gates, refugee admissions will explode in coming weeks

Betraying the voters who elected Donald Trump, the Department of State slipped the news to the contractors on Thursday who then slipped the news to the New York Times just as you were packing up for the beach or getting ready for a family barbecue using the federal government’s favorite holiday weekend trick to bury the news.

Forget everything I said in my post yesterday about Trump’s “average” admissions. If they do as they are now saying they will, Donald Trump will be responsible for one of six highest resettlement years since 9/11.

The NYTimes.com reports:

U.S. Quietly Lifts Limit on Number of Refugees Allowed In

by Gardiner Harris

WASHINGTON — Despite repeated efforts by President Trump to curtail refugee resettlements, the State Department this week quietly lifted the department’s restriction on the number of refugees allowed to enter the United States.

The result could be a near doubling of refugees entering the country, from about 830 people a week in the first three weeks of this month to well over 1,500 people per week by next month, according to refugee advocates. Tens of thousands of refugees are waiting to come to the United States.

Tens of thousands. The bulk of whom are Muslim.

President Trump wanted a travel stay from primarily seven, then six Middle Eastern terror-oriented nations. He is getting the exact opposite, aided and abetted by black robed men and women nurturing and issuing their very own fake laws.

You can see how well that’s going for Europe. Do we really want that same state of affairs here in the United States? More deaths from persons who have no investment whatsoever in Western culture or civilization and, further, want not simply to be just indifferent but want to tear it down completely?



Voting corruption in Virginia is just fine

virginia-voterTypical poor and under-represented illegal felon voter in Virginia, endorsed and embraced by Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe.

So says Leftist Demorat Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe.

You know, the governor who decided it was a grand idea that felons be compelled to vote in his state. Gosh. I wonder how felons will vote in Virginia? Republican or Demorat? I have no damned idea. Do you?

But why has Governor McAuliffe blocked the revelation of voting corruption in Virginia? Let’s look.

Virginia’s election officials are enabling illegal voting by foreign citizens, according to an extensive new study, entitled “Alien Invasion in Virginia,” by a former Department of Justice voting-rights lawyer named J. Christian Adams who served under both Bush and Obama.

In this report, at least 1,048 non-citizens were allowed to vote, according also to the Public Interest Legal Foundation, of which Adams is the president.

That means Virginia election officials were enabling illegal registration and voting by foreign citizens, discovered by voting records.

The sad truth is: this is but a small portion of what is occurring nationwide with regard to Leftists and Demorats corrupting the vote.

Do what I call The Logical Extension.

The 1,000 illegals who were discovered? That encompasses only eight counties within Virginia. There are 95 counties in Virginia. That’s only one state. There are 50 states. There are also the territories of Puerto Rico, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, United States Virgin Islands and American Samoa. Do the math. Hello?

Do the math.

The Virginia Board of Elections stonewalled the inquiry by Adams, via a public information request. Guess that info isn’t quite so public. The City of Alexandria had to be sued for their records as well. Each count is a felony. Does anyone care?

Where is Obama’s DOJ on this? Honed in like a missile? Given marching orders to suss out the fraud? Locked in like a laser beam? Loretta Lynch on standby?

us-doj-corrupt-smaller-aUh, no.

Perfectly understandable, considering the Leftists and Demorats who will profit from these illegal votes.

Let’s look closer at some facts.

MoveOn.org this past week sent a message written by Robert Reich about the dire circumstances of the Demorats — despite their rampant cheating and support by the American Media Maggots.

Reich wrote that there were:

“Some jaw-dropping statistics that you and I have to turn around. Only 65% of Democrats say they’re sure they’ll vote this year—which is lower than it’s been in decades. And it’s eleven points lower than the 76% of Republicans who say they’re certain to vote. With Hillary Clinton ahead by an average of just 3.7 points in the most recent polls, this gap in who plans to vote is more than large enough to cost Clinton the election. The hard reality is that this race could go either way depending on voter turnout. That’s why MoveOn’s massive voter turnout operation is so vital.”

“This race could go either way.”

That is why Demorat voter fraud is so incredibly, incredibly important to them now, more than ever, for two extremely salient reasons. 1) In their view, Hillary Clinton is DUE the presidency, and 2) Even with the rampant corruption, she is in jeopardy.

I revealed Demorat voter fraud just last post, as designated here.

In Virginia, the State Board of Elections won’t even reveal what is happening. That is because of an edict from their governor and his minions. They won’t reveal the extent of alien registration in Virginia — WHICH IS A LARGE SWING STATE.

As Lou Dobbs said: “The Republican party is almost getting Darwinian. If they haven’t got the strength, the intelligence, the energy, the drive, the principals to win — you’re going to die.”


But let’s not exclude this from HotAir.com:

More voter fraud which never happens uncovered in Illinois

by Jazz Shaw

Voter ID laws are racist. Asking questions about people during the voter registration process is xenophobia. If you reduce early voting periods you’re suppressing minorities. All in all, Democrats know that voter fraud is essentially an illusion created by Republicans in an effort to ensure that only rich white people get to vote. That’s why I’m sure that this story out of the Land of Lincoln can’t possibly be correct. (USA Politics)

The Kankakee County Attorney’s office is investigating at least three cases of voter fraud where people were offered bribes for voting.

In addition, State’s Attorney Jamie Boyd said, “several” vote-by-mail applications have been mailed in from people who live outside the county, The Daily Journal is reporting.

“This unprecedented action was taken in response to reports of individuals from Chicago offering gifts to potential voters in exchange for a vote for Kate Cloonen, Hillary Clinton and others,” Boyd said in the news release. “Our office takes seriously the obligation to protect the rights of citizens to vote for the candidate of their choice, and to do so without undue influence from special interest groups.

Right. Gone. Racist.

The process rules are being corrupted by those who crave power and are willing to bend whatever rules confront them.

Republicans could call for this information to be released.

Will they?

Another election stolen?



DOJ corrupt AGAIN, covering for Clinton & Obama: CONNECTING THE DOTS

us-doj-corrupt-smaller-aOnce again, there is no aspect of Obama’s DC that isn’t corrupt to the bone, and that includes — sadly — the FBI as well as continuing corruption at the DOJ.

From Politico.com:

Obama DOJ drops charges against alleged provider of Libyan weapons

by Kenneth P. Vogel and Josh Gerstein

Arms dealer had threatened to expose Hillary Clinton’s talks about arming anti-Qadhafi rebels.

The Obama administration is moving to dismiss charges against an arms dealer it had accused of selling weapons that were destined for Libyan rebels.

Lawyers for the Justice Department on Monday filed a motion in federal court in Phoenix to drop the case against the arms dealer, an American named Marc Turi, whose lawyers also signed the motion.

Here come the two most important paragraphs of the entire story.

The deal averts a trial that threatened to cast additional scrutiny on Hillary Clinton’s private emails as Secretary of State, and to expose reported Central Intelligence Agency attempts to arm rebels fighting Libyan leader Moammar Qadhafi.

Just as Hillary has shite on Obama, Marc Turi has shite on Obama and Hillary. Therefore, the DOJ was directed by Lynch via DC and Mr Obama to drop the case that could further damage DC, Obama and Clinton. That’s how it’s played.


Marc Turi with his stock in trade. Not a dumb guy, as he has Obama over a barrel.

A Turi associate asserted that the government dropped the case because the proceedings could have embarrassed Clinton and President Barack Obama by calling attention to the reported role of their administration in supplying weapons that fell into the hands of Islamic extremist militants.

Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State blinkered Libya and essentially had Muammar Gaddafi killed — who for the longest time had been keeping himself quiet following the 1986 bombing of Libya under Reagan, in retaliation for a Berlin disco bombing where a US serviceman was killed. Gaddafi got in line, disarmed, gave up his nuclear program and WMD in 2003 under Bush and otherwise became a much quieter guy. He saw what happened in Iraq.

Turi adviser Robert Stryk of the government relations and consulting firm SPG accused the government of trying to scapegoat Turi to cover up Clinton’s mishandling of Libya.

“The U.S. government spent millions of dollars, went all over the world to bankrupt him, and destroyed his life — all to protect Hillary Clinton’s crimes,” he said, alluding to the deadly Sept. 11, 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

Note this as well:

Wikileaks head Julian Assange in July suggested that he had emails proving that Clinton “pushed” the “flows” of weapons “going over to Syria.”

She knew of and had a hand in the gun-running scheme which originated from the oval office.

Now, because of the US involved in gun-running again, not unlike Fast and Furious — (which resulted in the death of USBP Agent Brian Terry) — asses must be covered, secrets must be kept and lives, unfortunately, were lost once more. This time, four lives.

Do you see how squalid and dirty and corrupt this all is?

Now it starts to come together, does it not? The information dovetails and dots can now be connected. It is all intertwined and rife with Demorat corruption on every level. Items and incidents that you initially thought unconnected have now been linked.

Benghazi had to be minimized because it involved gun-running by the US government under Barack Hussein Obama — not unlike Iran-Contra. The running meme had to be an anti-Islamic video because Obama had already stated he had al Qaeda “on the run” and anything not in keeping that meme could not be tolerated. But that was only one aspect.

Then came the gun-running scheme from Obama and his Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton. The New York Times had already published, in December of 2012 (almost two months following the attack on the Benghazi compound, September 11th of 2012), this article:

U.S.-Approved Arms for Libya Rebels Fell Into Jihadis’ Hands

by James Risen, Mark Mazzetti and Michael S. Schmidt

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration secretly gave its blessing to arms shipments to Libyan rebels from Qatar last year, but American officials later grew alarmed as evidence grew that Qatar was turning some of the weapons over to Islamic militants, according to United States officials and foreign diplomats.

That was 2012. No one yet knew about Hillary and her private servers, her private emails and the reasons for their existence, so the NYT wrote:

No evidence has emerged linking the weapons provided by the Qataris during the uprising against Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi to the attack that killed four Americans at the United States diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, in September.

Except that on September 11th, 2012, following the attack, neither Barack Hussein Obama or Hillary Rodham Clinton quite knew what to do, realizing full well that their gun-running scheme had backfired.

Again, asses had to be covered since the attack had not been anticipated and the lying commenced immediately.

Susan Rice was briefed in terms of the talking points for the Sunday news shows whilst, simultaneously, Hillary Clinton emailed her own daughter Chelsea (giving her daughter the alias of “Diane Reynolds,” clear consciousness of guilt), the very night of the attack, and wrote that two officers had been killed, attributing the attack to an “Al-Qaeda-like group.” Hillary Clinton and her daughter both knew the truth yet Hillary spun lies from the very beginning, meant to be consumed by the public, that the attack was a spontaneous reaction to an anti-Islamic video created in the US.

“We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful internet video,” Hillary Clinton said, lying to America. Then she lied to the faces of the parents of the dead Benghazi soldiers.

Susan Rice lied, Hillary Clinton lied, and Barack Obama let them both carry his water. Why? Because Barack Hussein Obama was up for re-election in 2012.

The fix was in yet, at the same time, the complications were beginning to snowball. Things were beginning to unravel for Hillary Clinton.

Even to the extent that Christopher Stevens was present to facilitate and monitor some of those acts and, because of secrecy, Christopher Stevens and three other Americans had to be sacrificed in order to keep that secrecy.

There are even indicators to suggest that Ambassador Stevens may have been killed with weapons that he helped facilitate.

benghazi-deadHillary Clinton’s emails could not be exposed because they not only illustrated that she was conducting Clinton Foundation business through her Secretary of State private email — in order to keep that secret as well — but because I suspect there is also information contained within those emails about Benghazi and gun running. And those were the emails classified as “secret” and will not be released for two reasons. One, that it would show Obama’s complicity and, two, that it would show Hillary Clinton’s as well.

Initially, Clinton likely had the server set up to hide the pay-to-play activities conducted during her tenure as secretary of state, but it had the added bonus of enabling her to hide her inevitable failures in the Libyan role — evidenced by her duplicity involving the Benghazi terror attacks.

Even worse, we learned that Barack Hussein Obama sent and received emails to Hillary’s private server — under an alias — because of FBI records released on Friday, September 23rd. At that time, Obama had no idea that the subject of Hillary’s private server would become any sort of issue. Even so, when this was discovered, the State Department refused to disclose the content of Mr Obama’s emails, citing the “presidential communications privilege” — a kind of executive privilege designed to foil FOIA requests.

You see how large and juggernaut-like the snowball became, and why both Hillary and Obama continued to perpetuate lies and cover-ups, insisting their lackeys do the same? Things didn’t get better on the email front, they got worse, thanks to Republicans like Trey Gowdy, Jason Chaffetz and Darrell Issa, who were tenacious and refused to give up — despite the constant clangor of the American Media Maggots that “there is nothing to see here, this is not the corruption you are looking for, move on, move on.”

Said lackeys would include Attorney General Loretta Lynch and FBI Director James Comey, of the so-called Department of Justice.

Now you understand why Comey, in his fundamentally-flawed reasoning — yet still setting out some meaty hooks from which to hang Hillary Clinton — determined he would not recommend an indictment for Clinton and why, in her own way, Loretta Lynch threw Comey under the bus when saying she would abide by his conclusions. She knew the deed was done and the fix was in. She had received “the phone call” as well as Director Comey. They both understood what was at stake, overall. Now their own political asses were on the line. Bill Clinton’s “coincidental” meeting at the airport with Lynch was nothing more than a confirmation of same. The fix, in fact, was most definitely “in.”

Let us not forget the recent approval for destruction by the FBI of laptops belonging to former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills and ex-campaign staffer Heather Samuelson, in an exchange for immunity which also limits the FBI’s search to no later than Jan. 31, 2015. “This meant investigators could not review documents for the period after the email server became public — in turn preventing the bureau from discovering if there was any evidence of obstruction of justice.”

Immunity is provided for testimony. Do you see testimony here? You cannot “take the 5th” because, due to the immunity itself, it is not self-incrimination. Where is the testimony of Mills and Samuelson? And why destroy evidence? The very concept of immunity is to collect and keep evidence, not to destroy it. The only possible purpose would be to permanently dispose of prejudicial evidence against Obama, Clinton, Lynch, Comey, Turi, et al.

All because of “hdr22@clintonemail.com.” That was Hillary Rodham Clinton’s private email address. The one Gawker discovered by way of Sidney Blumenthal’s hacked emails via “Guccifer.”

Ruh roh.

The lies, the corruption, the deceit, the foul and noxious, malodorous stench of continued cover-ups conducted in plain sight, aided and abetted by the American Media Maggots is obvious, staggering, of much greater proportions than anything imagined by Richard Nixon as — for one — no one died behind Watergate.

Which leads us to the news that our blessed DOJ had decided not to prosecute Marc Turi because the oval office knows he would spill beans, and why Obama must continue to support Hillary Rodham Clinton as she, too, would spill beans.


If I can tie this all up in one post, why can’t the media?

Oh yes. Barack Hussein Obama has fundamentally changed America.



The FIX in Phoenix

Democrat LIES via Bill and Hill and LorettaThe fix is in.

To what am I referencing, you may ask?  Please read this, from ABC15 in Phoenix, which reports:

US Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Bill Clinton meet privately in Phoenix before Benghazi report

by Christopher Sign

PHOENIX – Amid an ongoing investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of email and hours before the public release of the Benghazi report, US Attorney General Loretta Lynch met privately with former President Bill Clinton.

The private meeting took place on the west side of Sky Harbor International Airport on board a parked private plane.

Former President Clinton was visiting the Phoenix area and arrived to Sky Harbor Monday evening to depart.

Sources tell ABC15 Clinton was notified Lynch would be arriving at the airport soon and waited for her arrival.

Let us now do what I call the Logical Extension.  Nothing with regard to American politics occurs in a vacuum.  And Bill Clinton is not only not stupid but he does not operate in a political vacuum.  If there were someone who is cooly, calmly cogitating with regard to politics, it is William Jefferson Clinton.  William Jefferson Clinton exists to fill vacuums.

Translated: Clinton waited for Lynch’s arrival for a very specific reason.  William Jefferson Clinton does not waste time because time is money.  Money.  Because only two items motivate the Clintons:  1) Money, and 2) Power.  Unlike Frank Underwood, the Clinton’s Juggernaut has acquired the point where money and power are roughly equal in their lust.

The meeting was simply coincidental and involved only brusque mandatory pleasantries with regard to grandchildren and such.  Because it was 106-degrees in Phoenix that day and likely 112-degrees on the tarmac.  Because William Jefferson Clinton is customarily motivated by like pleasantries with other Demorats.  When they happen to share private jets at congruent airports.

Despite the fact that William Jefferson Clinton had to deplane his own personal private jet in order to step into the personal private jet of Loretta Elizabeth Lynch.

Yes.  Your tax dollars at work.

Oh wait.  Demorats that William Jefferson Clinton happened to appoint to particular posts.  Oh wait.  Like Loretta Elizabeth Lynch.being nominated In 1999 by William Jefferson Clinton to be US Attorney for the Eastern District of New York?  Yes, like that.

Lynch was arriving in Phoenix for a planned visit as part of her national tour to promote community policing.

ABC15 asked Lynch about the meeting during her news conference at the Phoenix Police Department.

“I did see President Clinton at the Phoenix airport as he was leaving and spoke to myself and my husband on the plane,” said Lynch.

The private meeting comes as Lynch’s office is in charge of the ongoing investigation and potential charges involving Clinton’s email server.

The private meeting also occurred hours before the Benghazi report was released publicly involving Hillary Clinton and President Obama’s administration.

But, wait.

Didn’t press secretary, Josh Earnest, unequivocally state that the investigation of Hillary Clinton would be “free of political influence” and that he would leave it to the attorney general to explain the meeting?

He did.

So what occurred in their thirty-minute very private meeting with no one else around?  Exchanged photos of grandchildren?  Talk about the next season of Game of Thrones?  I suspect not.

I suspect the convo went something like this:

Bill: “You know, Rhett, remember that candy I gave you back in 1999?  I think I could use a little candy in return, but not for me.  For my wife.  Everyone sure loves Hillary.  It would be a shame if she lost the presidency because people thought she was gonna be prosecuted.”

Rhett: “Maybe I can do something about that.”

Bill: “Well Rhett, we sure would be appreciative.  And I bet the Democrats would be appreciative too, her being the first female president and all.  Everybody sure loves Hillary.  And you know, being a Senator has better health benefits, if you’d be interested.”

Never mind about the “optics” of the incident.  The American Media Maggots will do their level best to tamp it down and sweep it under the rug.  Conflict of interest?  Truly, who cares?

What do you think would occur if the roles were reversed?  What if the players involved were all Republicans and this meeting occurred?  The AMM would be on this story for weeks and it would be front page news for that amount of time.


From HotAir.com:

Reporter: FBI ordered ‘no photos, no pictures, no cell phones’ during Clinton/Lynch meeting

by Larry O/Connor

Reporter Christopher Sign of ABC 15 in Phoenix, AZ appeared on The O’Reilly Factor Thursday night to talk about his scoop involving that secret meeting between former President Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

“The former president steps into her plane. They then speak for 30 minutes privately. The FBI there on the tarmac instructing everybody around ‘no photos, no pictures, no cell phones.’”

First of all, it isn’t the FBI’s job to tell journalists or private citizens they can’t take photographs of a former president and the Attorney General. What were the agents going to do, arrest people for taking a picture or video?

Also, if there was nothing wrong with the meeting and it was totally innocent, why were federal agents instructed to demand no one take a picture?


At the VERY least, Lynch should recuse herself from the matter and appoint a special prosecutor.  At the worst she should be fired and then an investigation opened on her corruption.

After all, I’m sure that Bill and Rhett only talked about their grandkids, right?

I only ask:

Is there one — just one attorney in the DOJ — who is not corrupt?

And can, moreover, take a stand and publicly state that he or she is not broken in the face of rampant agency misconduct and fraudulence?


I thought not.