Demorat moron says Jews = termites

Remember this wondrous video?  The day that Guam tipped over?

It was good for a larf for quite some time; years in fact.  God bless YouTube, immuring forever the idiocy of politicians.  In this case, a Demorat politician.  Let’s relive these fateful few entertaining minutes once more.

Hank Johnson, (D), (M)oron (I)mbecile, steps into it again.


Congressman who once feared Guam could capsize compares Jewish settlers to ‘termites’

by Adam Kredo

A Democratic member of the House Armed Services Committee compared Jewish Israeli settlers to termites on Monday while speaking at an event sponsored by an anti-Israel organization that supports boycotts of the Jewish state.

Rep. Hank Johnson, D- Ga., launched into a tirade against Israel and its policies toward the Palestinians, comparing Jewish people who live in disputed territories to “termites” that destroy homes. Johnson also compared Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman to Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, a remark that drew vocal agreement from those in the room.

Let us also not forget that the DNC emails revealed by Wikileaks illustrated that the entire Demorat Party itself minimizes Jews particularly in the form of Hillary Clinton’s opponent Bernie Sanders, trying to portray Sanders — a Jew — as an atheist.

Welcome once more to the cretinous, anti-Semitic face of the Demorat Party.



Leftists: dissension must be ELIMINATED

Leftists DON'T ALLOW DISSENSIONFirst on the agenda: the Drudge Report (though it’s nothing more than an aggregator) and Fox News.  Then the entire internet.


First, from the

Fox targeted by FEC Dems in first-ever vote to punish debate sponsorship

by Paul Bedard

Finally making good on long-harbored anger at conservative media, Democrats on the Federal Election Commission voted in secret to punish Fox News’ sponsorship of a Republican presidential debate, using an obscure law to charge the network with helping those on stage.

STOP.  Read that first sentence again: “Finally making good on LONG-HARBORED ANGER at CONSERVATIVE media, DEMOCRATS on the Federal Election Commission voted in SECRET to PUNISH Fox News’ sponsorship of a Republican presidential debate, USING AN OBSCURE LAW to charge the network with helping those on stage.”

Would that not be unlike Lois Lerner and the IRS who complained bitterly that no such thing was done until finally the IRS admitted that precisely that thing was done?

It is the first time in history that members of the FEC voted to punish a media outlet’s debate sponsorship, and it follows several years of Democratic threats against conservative media and websites like the Drudge Report.

The punishment, however, was blocked by all three Republicans on the commission, resulting in a 3-3 tie vote and no action. The vote was posted Thursday and is here.

Imagine the results had Demorats simply owned that board, as Demorats own the state of California on most every level?

It seems that CNN sponsored quite a number of Democrat debates.  CNN sponsored four Democrat debates, of the ten documented — that’s almost half.  The GOP had twelve debates, six of which were sponsored by Fox.  That also is half.  Any issue with the FEC?

Here’s the obvious kicker:

CNN did the same thing, but there is no indication that they faced a complaint.

Do not think that the Demorats and Leftists are content to stop there.  They absolutely, incontrovertibly, wish to control the entire internet and all its content — particularly if that content is right-leaning in nature.


Also from the

Federal regulation of Internet coming, warn FCC, FEC commissioners

by Paul Bedard

Democrats targeting content and control of the Internet, especially from conservative sources, are pushing hard to layer on new regulations and even censorship under the guise of promoting diversity while policing bullying, warn commissioners from the Federal Communications Commission and Federal Election Commission.

“Protecting freedom on the Internet is just one vote away,” said Lee E. Goodman, a commissioner on the FEC which is divided three Democrats to three Republicans. “There is a cloud over your free speech.”

What is diversity?  In the eyes of Leftists, it is a One World Barbeque — that is, all persons saying, writing and thinking the same: a Leftist fashion.  Dissension cannot be tolerated.  What the FEC and Leftists and Demorats want is the same freedom of speech one now customarily finds on college campuses in America today; that is, little to none.

BZ License To BlogIn this vein I wrote, many years ago in 2010, that I could foresee the time where I as a blogger would require a literal license to blog.  To express my opinions and feelings.

Freedom of speech on the Internet, added Ajit Pai, commissioner of the Federal Communications Commission, “is increasingly under threat.”

Pai and Goodman cited political correctness campaigns by Democrats as a threat. Both also said their agencies are becoming politicized and the liberals are using their power to push regulations that impact business and conservative outlets and voices.

Of course it’s under threat.  Leftists and Demorat want absolute control of speech as well as most every other aspect of your life.  With a SCOTUS that leans far left as would occur under the lying and brazenly-corrupt Hillary Clinton, you can quite certainly wave good-bye to your Bill of Rights, with the Second and First Amendments primarily in their PC sights.

“One of the things that is critical for this country is to reassert the value of the First Amendment, the fact that robust discourse, that is sometimes cacophonous, is nonetheless a value, in fact it creates value,” said Pai.

But wait; perhaps you thought I was kidding with the whole “my blog will be involved as will yours” thingie?  Read on.

At a CATO Institute discussion on online speech Wednesday night, both said that regulators are eager to issue new rules that could put limits on what people could say on blogs, online news and even YouTube. Washington Examiner reporter Rudy Takala and Cato’s digital manager Kat Murti were also on the panel.

There it is in black and white.  Do not for a moment believe that, somehow, miraculously, you will remain unaffected — particularly if you are a Conservative.  Or a Libertarian for that matter — John Stossel, I’m looking at you, sir.

Pai, addressing Goodman, added, “The common thread of our experiences I think is this impulse of control, whether it’s the FCC and the impulse of the government to want to control how these networks operate, and the FEC to control the content of the traffic that traverses over those networks, and I think that certainly highlights the importance of the First Amendment.”

Goodman concluded, “We need to be ever mindful and vigilant not to let governmental agencies through 3-2 votes, or 4-2 votes at the FEC take that away from us.”

Let there be no mistake.  Leftists and Demorats want control of our lives, complete and utter control of what we do, what we eat, where we live, how we live our lives and ultimately what we write, say and even think.

Leftists and Demorats would truly be pleased with a 1984 environment.

1984 - Big BrotherI can see an upheaval coming, ladies and gentlemen, if Demorats and Leftists keep removing our rights and our freedoms.



Gowdy: “why are gun prosecutions DOWN under Obama?”

Demorat TEMPER TANTRUMExcellent question.

Read this from Trey Gowdy:

Trey Gowdy House DemoratsAs our American tax dollars pay for House Demorats to act like spoiled little children, their perfumed bums sitting upon nice, thick carpet, they prove once again that their views have no basis in reality and demand to — as always — selectively enforce laws and completely disregard others.

Kabuki TheatreDC Kabuki Theater, as Demorats Occupy the House Floor.  Pacifiers all around.



Hispandering: el Debate Democrata

UNIVISION MEXICAN RACISTSIn case you didn’t watch — and I’m guessing you didn’t — you missed out on the Wednesday night Univision/Washington Post Demorat debate, the 8th in the series of Demorat debates.

Held in Miami, Univision took over and broadcast most everything in Spanish on CNN, under “el Debate Democrata, conversacion politica.”

Right.  Because Mexican women are talking about economia numero uno, religion numero dos, and aborto numero tres.

Mexican men are concerned about etica gubernamental numero uno, problemas raciales numero dos, and economia numero tres.

Good of CNN to turn themselves completely over to Univision so that actual Americans who speak English were at a complete disadvantage.

The moderators were the racists Jorge Ramos, Maria Elena Salinas and token female Caucasoid journalista Karen Tumulty of the Washington Post, who mostly remained silent.

Jorge Ramos hammered Hillary Clinton on Obama’s having deported more than 2.5 million ILLEGAL immigrants (most Mexicans) during his tenure.  He called her potentially the next Deporter In Chief.  “Can you promise you won’t deport children and you won’t deport immigrants with no criminal record?  Can I get a yes or no answer?”

Clinton said, “yes, you can.”  Hillary wants to change the laws and “stop the raids, stop the roundups, stop the deporting of people who are living here, doing their lives, doing their jobs and that’s my priority.”

The racist Jorge Ramos had kittens in response and asked the question again and again.  Sanders promised too, of course.

There you go.  Once again Leftists and Demorats deciding just which laws they will or will not enforce, which laws illegals must or must not obey.

If only that mindset translated over to actual living, breathing, lawful American Taxpayers — you know, that 55% of persons in the US who are still stupid enough and cowed enough to pay taxes — as opposed to the 45% who do not.

That was enough for me.  The entire purpose of the Univision debate was to ensure that there was a Demorat confirmation to fellate the Hispanic willy.

I have to hand it to Bernie Sanders.  He is a known quantity and hasn’t much changed his tune for decades.  He is truly a Democratic Socialist.  I can respect Sanders for that.  He’ll tell you what he is and you know what his stances are and will be.  Props to Sanders for having the stones to be honest.

Hillary Clinton was braced with being an lying untrustworthy bitch to the tune of a 37% believability rate.  In response Clinton proffered verbal effluvium, as per normal.

Let me be clear: these two Mexican racists — with their little biclavial token journalista GOWP female sitting next to them — existed in space on Wednesday night only to make sure their Mexican “needs” were met.  In a word: Hispandering.

Why are they racist?  Supremely easy to answer: either everyone is equal or no one is equal.

Aztlan-La-RazaWhen these two racists sit at a moderator’s panel and push agendas specific to only one race — Hispanics (God I hate that word) — and the name of La Raza (translated: The Race, which advocates “reconquista“) even escapes their lips, I know they are racists.

Reverse it: imagine there was a Caucasoid Channel sponsoring the GOP debates and moderators were asking what the candidates could do for whites?

Bernie Sanders is at least honest.  He is what he is.

Hillary Clinton is a lying, plotting, calculating snake of a politician who exists only to line her own pockets and those of her family.  Everyone else — and I mean everyone else — can go to hell.

She will say and do whatever it takes to feather her personal bed.  If that happens to benefit the Demorats, so be it.  But her allegiance lies much more inwards, much more centrally-focused.

I can understand why Hillary is seen as the Establishment candidate and Bernie as the outsider, despite a lengthy career in politics.

For those whose comments will include “I wouldn’t have wasted my time,” I say: never ignore your enemy.

Know your enemy.

Besides: I watched so you wouldn’t have to.


Not one mention of the national debt.  Not one mention of how the policies will be paid for other than to “tax the one per-cent.”

As if money simply gets created if one but simply wills it into existence.

Oh, wait; government simply makes the money.