In case you didn’t watch — and I’m guessing you didn’t — you missed out on the Wednesday night Univision/Washington Post Demorat debate, the 8th in the series of Demorat debates.
Held in Miami, Univision took over and broadcast most everything in Spanish on CNN, under “el Debate Democrata, conversacion politica.”
Right. Because Mexican women are talking about economia numero uno, religion numero dos, and aborto numero tres.
Mexican men are concerned about etica gubernamental numero uno, problemas raciales numero dos, and economia numero tres.
Good of CNN to turn themselves completely over to Univision so that actual Americans who speak English were at a complete disadvantage.
The moderators were the racists Jorge Ramos, Maria Elena Salinas and token female Caucasoid journalista Karen Tumulty of the Washington Post, who mostly remained silent.
Jorge Ramos hammered Hillary Clinton on Obama’s having deported more than 2.5 million ILLEGAL immigrants (most Mexicans) during his tenure. He called her potentially the next Deporter In Chief. “Can you promise you won’t deport children and you won’t deport immigrants with no criminal record? Can I get a yes or no answer?”
Clinton said, “yes, you can.” Hillary wants to change the laws and “stop the raids, stop the roundups, stop the deporting of people who are living here, doing their lives, doing their jobs and that’s my priority.”
The racist Jorge Ramos had kittens in response and asked the question again and again. Sanders promised too, of course.
There you go. Once again Leftists and Demorats deciding just which laws they will or will not enforce, which laws illegals must or must not obey.
If only that mindset translated over to actual living, breathing, lawful American Taxpayers — you know, that 55% of persons in the US who are still stupid enough and cowed enough to pay taxes — as opposed to the 45% who do not.
That was enough for me. The entire purpose of the Univision debate was to ensure that there was a Demorat confirmation to fellate the Hispanic willy.
I have to hand it to Bernie Sanders. He is a known quantity and hasn’t much changed his tune for decades. He is truly a Democratic Socialist. I can respect Sanders for that. He’ll tell you what he is and you know what his stances are and will be. Props to Sanders for having the stones to be honest.
Hillary Clinton was braced with being an lying untrustworthy bitch to the tune of a 37% believability rate. In response Clinton proffered verbal effluvium, as per normal.
Let me be clear: these two Mexican racists — with their little biclavial token journalista GOWP female sitting next to them — existed in space on Wednesday night only to make sure their Mexican “needs” were met. In a word: Hispandering.
Why are they racist? Supremely easy to answer: either everyone is equal or no one is equal.
When these two racists sit at a moderator’s panel and push agendas specific to only one race — Hispanics (God I hate that word) — and the name of La Raza (translated: The Race, which advocates “reconquista“) even escapes their lips, I know they are racists.
Reverse it: imagine there was a Caucasoid Channel sponsoring the GOP debates and moderators were asking what the candidates could do for whites?
Bernie Sanders is at least honest. He is what he is.
Hillary Clinton is a lying, plotting, calculating snake of a politician who exists only to line her own pockets and those of her family. Everyone else — and I mean everyone else — can go to hell.
She will say and do whatever it takes to feather her personal bed. If that happens to benefit the Demorats, so be it. But her allegiance lies much more inwards, much more centrally-focused.
I can understand why Hillary is seen as the Establishment candidate and Bernie as the outsider, despite a lengthy career in politics.
For those whose comments will include “I wouldn’t have wasted my time,” I say: never ignore your enemy.
Know your enemy.
Besides: I watched so you wouldn’t have to.
Not one mention of the national debt. Not one mention of how the policies will be paid for other than to “tax the one per-cent.”
As if money simply gets created if one but simply wills it into existence.
Oh, wait; government simply makes the money.