Voter fraud? No problem! Come one, come all!

James O'KeefeAnd, of course, amply and ably documented by UK media.  Take it away,

EXCLUSIVE: Undercover video shows North Carolina poll workers offering ballots to ineligible impostor – TWENTY TIMES – putting voter ID battle on the front burner

by David Martosko
  • Conservative guerrilla filmmaker James O’Keefe pretended to be a series of North Carolinians who hadn’t voted in years
  • In precinct after precinct, election officials offered him ballots without confirming his identity
  • Only one polling place turned him away without an ID, but officials there were breaking the rules in order to do it
  • O’Keefe famously embarrassed US Attorney General Eric Holder by obtaining the cabinet member’s ballot in Washington as a protest against the lack of an ID mandate at the polls – a racially charged US controversy 
  • New Mexico officials said Saturday that someone had fraudulently voted in the name of a man who later showed up in person to cast his ballot

North Carolina election officials repeatedly offered ballots last week to an impostor who arrived at polling places with the names and addresses of ‘inactive’ voters who hadn’t participated in elections for many years.

No fraudulent votes were actually cast: It was the latest undercover video sting from conservative activist James O’Keefe, whose filmmaking résumé reads like a target list of liberal causes.

Voter fraud is a myth, say Demorats.  I say: they’re full of shit:

This, ladies and gentlemen, is how Leftist traitors enable fraudulent votes for Demorats, election after election after election.  Take this situation documented on video and multiply it times the remaining 49 states for the actual amount of voter fraud.

And is precisely WHY Demorats consistently rail against any form of voter ID laws — because it would diminish the number of votes cast solely for Demorats.

“Welcome aboard.  Hah hah hah hah.  .  .”

A vote for any Demorat is a vote for fraud, corruption, the fleecing of taxpayers and the collapse of the United States of America.

You may recall, James O’Keefe was essentially single-handedly responsible for shutting down the corrupt organization known as ACORN.

For more, please visit and donate to Project Veritas.  Information about James O’Keefe here.



Why Demorats do not want voter ID, and why they want illegals to vote:

From the

Could non-citizens decide the November election?

by Jesse Richman and David Earnest

Could control of the Senate in 2014 be decided by illegal votes cast by non-citizens? Some argue that incidents of voting by non-citizens are so rare as to be inconsequential, with efforts to block fraud a screen for an agenda to prevent poor and minority voters from exercising the franchise, while others define such incidents as a threat to democracy itself. Both sides depend more heavily on anecdotes than data.

In a forthcoming article in the journal Electoral Studies, we bring real data from big social science survey datasets to bear on the question of whether, to what extent, and for whom non-citizens vote in U.S. elections. Most non-citizens do not register, let alone vote. But enough do that their participation can change the outcome of close races.

That is precisely what the Demorats want.

Our data comes from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES). Its large number of observations (32,800 in 2008 and 55,400 in 2010) provide sufficient samples of the non-immigrant sub-population, with 339 non-citizen respondents in 2008 and 489 in 2010. For the 2008 CCES, we also attempted to match respondents to voter files so that we could verify whether they actually voted.

But here’s the Crux of the Biscuit:

Because non-citizens tended to favor Democrats (Obama won more than 80 percent of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 CCES sample), we find that this participation was large enough to plausibly account for Democratic victories in a few close elections. Non-citizen votes could have given Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health-care reform and other Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress.

And there you go.  “Non-citizens tended to favor Democrats.”  That is precisely the reason for the Demorat pushback on voter ID laws, and the insistence on not closing our southern border.  It is no more complicated or craven than that.  Demorats seeking perpetual and unchallenged power.



Supreme Court: Arizona’s citizenship proof law is illegal

US Supreme CourtMeaning: you can’t require proof of citizenship when registering to vote.

From the Associated Press:

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court ruled Monday that states cannot on their own require would-be voters to prove they are U.S. citizens before using a federal registration system designed to make signing up easier.

Welcome to your New United States, America, where Scalia votes in the majority as well.





I was listening to the Tom Sullivan show on Tuesday afternoon.

He featured Fox News writer Todd Starnes.  Go here for the reference article.

As per the article of Mr Starnes, ICE management, under direct political pressure from the Obama Administration, has decided to suspend an ICE agent for doing nothing more than HIS JOB.

Because his upper management has, frankly, no guts and no logic.  They do have, however, individual hopes of climbing further up their own administrative ladder — and logic and law be damned.

As I said to all of my trainees when I first became an FTO in 1984: “if it is fiscally or politically expedient, you will be sacrificed.  Do not love your department, because it will never love you.”

From the article of Mr Starnes:

“A veteran Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent is facing suspension after he refused to release an illegal immigrant who was not considered a priority target under the Obama Administration’s new immigration enforcement policies, according to documents provided exclusively to Fox News.

Translated: a veteran ICE agent faces a suspension for enforcing laws on the books via USC.

“They’re punishing law enforcement officers who are just trying to uphold U.S. law,” said Chris Crane, president of the National ICE Council. Crane is a union representative acting on the unidentified officer’s behalf.

The officer under fire is an 18-year law enforcement and military veteran.”

Please continue to read the referenced article:

“A memorandum from Assistant Field Office Director David O’Neill, written the morning of the incident, reveals that the officers were told to release the subject even though he was in the country illegally.

The officer “became agitated and began to raise his voice and stated that he would not do as instructed,” O’Neill wrote in his memo.

As a result of disobeying the order to release a known criminal, the officer faces a three-day suspension and could ultimately lose his job and pension if he arrests another illegal not on the Obama administration’s priority list.”

Let me make this clear: a POLICY vs a LAW.

Apparently, a transient policy takes precedence over an immured law.  And semantics, of course, come into play:

A spokesman for ICE told Fox News they will not discuss “ongoing personnel matters.”

“ICE officers are not disciplined for lawful arrests,” the spokesperson said. “They may, however, be subject to discipline for insubordination and failure to follow agency polices and directives, among other reasons.”

Ironically, the illegal alien in this particular incident was given better treatment than an American citizen would have been in similar circumstances.

A spokesman for the Newark Police Dept. told Fox News that if an American had been stopped on the same charges – they would have been put in jail. The spokesman said officers would have let the judge sort out the details.

Crane said that’s the way it used to be – until President Obama loosened restrictions on illegal immigrants.

Imagine that.  Mr Obama pandering for Mexican votes.  Not French votes, not Ethiopian votes, not Sri Lankan votes, not Canadian votes — oh no.  Votes from Mexicans.  From Mexico.  Because they comprise the BULK of illegal invaders.  Imagine that.  Those persons on our southern border who wish to escape a corrupt, violent, backwards, emotional country.

And by those who wish to IMPORT those tendencies SOLELY for the purpose of padding votes proffered on the behalf of Free Cheese.

The orders are very clear:

Crane said agents in the field disputed the idea of prosecutorial discretion.

“This whole prosecutorial discretion thing is a big lie,” he said. “The administration is trying to say it gives us more flexibility to release people. It’s garbage. These are orders – very clear orders that you will release people.”

The points are:

“We can’t do anything anymore under these new guidelines,” he added. “

As a result, he said, an 18-year law enforcement veteran has to pay the price — and somewhere in the nation, a 35-year-old illegal immigrant is driving on a roadway without a license.

“If a law enforcement officer can’t perform routine enforcement functions, what do we have a law enforcement agency for,” Crane wondered.

An excellent question.  But a final observation:

Todd Starnes also let the “cat” out of the proverbial bag.  He was reluctant to reveal that another source had made a major indication, and that is this:

To this point, Mr Obama is planning to stop deportation altogether in the coming week.  Essentially: an amnesty.  And I can only forecast: for votes.

But now, because Mr Starnes made this plan public, I say: we shall see.

We shall see.

If so, it would be the worst possible move imaginable during a presidential campaign.