The insane mess created by Hillary Clinton

And you want this lying maladroit to be your president?

Watch fully please, and learn how remarkably systemic, convoluted and careless her abuse of America’s secrets is truly.

ORCON = Originator Control. ODNI = Office of Director of National Intelligence. OIG = Office of the Inspector General. That means this: the attorneys for Hillary Clinton discovered a legal “workaround” in which, because of security, her emails cannot be revealed due to privacy concerns — though she herself originally violated said security protocols.

Ladies and gentlemen, what happens when even Congress can’t find the truth?

Who, then, can?

BZ

 

If looks could kill: NY Elites boo Trump for the truth

Barbs were tossed, as expected, at the Alfred E. Smith Memorial Dinner on Thursday night — but the most telling were cast by Donald Trump. Because they were true.

First watch this. Then look very carefully at just who is sitting next to Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Why, that would be Cardinal Timothy Dolan, the Catholic who was speaking in the top video. I’m sure Cardinal Dolan leaned over and asked Hillary “who is this Brazile and what does he mean about Haiti?” Hillary replied: “Donna Brazile is my first floor maid at Chappaqua and she’s from Haiti; pay no attention to that.”

Note the facial reactions of persons in the video. They are quite priceless.

You can clearly see that the astoundingly-delicate elitist Leftist New York sensibilities were vexed when Trump addressed the dinner. It’s not cordial, you see, to speak such blatant truth to peoples’ faces. It’s much more acceptable to plunge the machete deep into the organs of your enemy from behind when he or she isn’t paying attention.

Julian Assange asks one question, however.

julian-assange-lyingSome may say that Donald Trump was massively out of order for conducting himself in this fashion at the Waldorf-Astoria dinner. I suggest, however, that he pulled so, so many possible punches available.

BZ

 

Debate: Hillary thinks throwing gays from roofs is humorous?

Is this not bizarre?

Hillary Rodham Clinton thinks this is amusing?

isis-throw-gays-from-roofThanks to Jersey Joe for the post-debate h/t.

BZ

 

Who hacked DNC/Podesta emails and why? Was it really the Russians?

Please listen to this video from Andrew Napolitano.

From ZeroHedge.com:

NSA Whistleblower: Not So Fast On Claims Russia Behind Hillary Clinton Email Hack

The mainstream media alleges that Russia was behind the hack of Hillary Clinton’s emails.

The media is parading out the usual suspects alleged experts to back up this claim.

Washington’s Blog asked the highest-level NSA whistleblower in history, William Binney – the NSA executive who created the agency’s mass surveillance program for digital information, who served as the senior technical director within the agency, who managed six thousand NSA employees, the 36-year NSA veteran widely regarded as a “legend” within the agency and the NSA’s best-ever analyst and code-breaker, who mapped out the Soviet command-and-control structure before anyone else knew how, and so predicted Soviet invasions before they happened (“in the 1970s, he decrypted the Soviet Union’s command system, which provided the US and its allies with real-time surveillance of all Soviet troop movements and Russian atomic weapons”) – what he thinks of such claims:

Edward Snowden says the NSA could easily determine who hacked Hillary Clinton’s emails.

But mainstream media say it couldn’t:   http://www.businessinsider.com/dnc-hack-russian-government-2016-7

The mainstream media is also trumpeting the meme that Russia was behind the hack, because it wants to help Trump get elected. In other words, the media is trying to deflect how damaging the email leaks are to Clinton’s character by trying to somehow associate Trump with Putin.

See e.g. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/26/us/politics/kremlin-donald-trump-vladimir-putin.html

Who’s right?

The Demorat dog whistle about Russia hacking the DNC and John Podesta is just that.

Binney responded:

Snowden is right and the MSM is clueless. Here’s what I said to Ray McGovern and VIPS with a little humor at the end. [McGovern is a 27-year CIA veteran, who chaired National Intelligence Estimates and personally delivered intelligence briefings to Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, their Vice Presidents, Secretaries of State, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and many other senior government officials. McGovern is co-founder of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (“VIPS” for short).]

Ray, I am suspicious that they may have looked for known hacking code (used by Russians). And, I’m sure they were one probably of many to hack her stuff. But, does that mean that they checked to see if others also hacked in?

Further, do they have evidence that the Russians downloaded and later forwarded those emails to wikileaks? Seems to me that they need to answer those questions to be sure that their assertion is correct. Otherwise, HRC and her political activities are and I am sure have been prime targets for the Russians (as well as many others) but without intent of course.

I would add that we proposed to do a program that would monitor all activity on the world-wide NSA network back in 1991/92. We called it “Wellgrounded.” NSA did not want anyone (especially congress) to know what was going on inside NSA and therefore rejected that proposal. I have not read what Ed has said, but, I do know that every line of code that goes across the network is logged in the network log. This is where a little software could scan, analyze and find the intruders initially and then compile all the code sent by them to determine the type of attack. This is what we wanted to do back in 1991/92.

The newest allegation tying the Clinton email hack to Russia seems to be all innuendo.

Please read the rest of the article.

You have to ask yourself: cui bono? Why would Russia not want Hillary Clinton in the White House? She would continue the overall leadership begun by Barack Hussein Obama — which is to say, little. Obama’s tactic is to “lead from behind” (a ludicrous oxymoron by itself) and, with that, Russia under the guidance of Putin realizes that Obama and, by extension, Clinton have been amenable to “working” with Russia and the so-called “reset.”

Let’s not forget it was Barack Hussein Obama who, sotto voce, told Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in 2012 that “after my election I’ll have more flexibility.”

Ask yourself: would Putin truly want a loose cannon like Donald Trump in the White House? This is how Reagan was characterized in 1979 and 1980 by Carter and his campaign — a “loose cannon” with his crazy, palsied finger on the nuke pile.

When you have the government hacking itself in order to keep national security, you have in many ways lost that government. An internal hack because you don’t trust a presidential candidate not to keep your secrets or kill your people?

Ladies and gentlemen, we are losing America and watching it devolve before our very eyes. It is astounding and sad, simultaneously.

Who hacked the DNC and the emails?

Ask again: cui bono?

BZ

 

Voter fraud: 1 in 8

demorat-voter-fraud-cartoonThe Pew Research Center report recently made a shocking discovery.

And that is:

ONE in EIGHT voter registrations in the United States is significantly inaccurate or no longer valid. That amounts to — wait for it — EIGHTEEN MILLION people. Plus another FOUR MILLION people ineligible or dead voters on the rolls.

Let that seep into your brainulus for a moment or three.

What is the population of the United States? That would be 318 million persons.

Frankly, it makes me wonder how my mother and father are voting right now. Oh right; my mother died in 2002 and my father in 2009.

When Donald Trump states “the election is rigged” — considering all that has been revealed recently — could that be the actual understatement of understatements?

Go to my posts here and here for verification.

At worst, ponder the Broken Clock Theory.

At the most obvious, consider that, as of Tuesday, because of two James O’Keefe Project Veritas videos, there have been at least four firings or resignations of Leftists directly due to PV’s revelations. Just on Tuesday.

The collusion and corruption is absolutely unprecedented. “Homeland Security” shouldn’t be running national elections. Because of having input into thousands of elections, one corrupter would have to influence only only venue instead of many. Entirely too tempting.

That mentioned, I will always despise George Bush for creating “Homeland Security” in the first place. All you had to do, George, is DEMAND that all the alphabet agencies play nice amongst themselves or you’d cut their funds.

The “Bully Pulpit.” Who had it, GW?

One must “repair” voting discrepancies at the state and county level, since it’s not a federal issue. Oh yes; unless certain personnel make it a federal issue. Except that Patrick Kennedy of the State Department was offering a federal bribe, a “quid pro quo” if you will, to FBI agents for key postings — to look the other way in DNC and HRC investigations.

Don’t quote to me statistics or political incidents from the 1800s. Yes, politics was rough then. What they didn’t have is the digital age where hacking can be done by, literally, jammie-wearing, thumb-sucking, T-ball, PlaySkool Leftists sitting in their parents’ basements.

But perhaps the key question might be: can the DC swamp actually be drained? I make this analogy because, originally, the White House was constructed in a swamp that is now termed a “tidal plain.” Right. Word pablum.

And the actual overarching question that no one is addressing?

The largest hard fiscal “re-set” in the history of America and possibly the world is looming.

Despite all the massive forces arrayed against one of the THE worst Republican candidates in history, HRC officially stands at 45% to DT’s 39%. To me, that bespeaks volumes, absolute volumes.

Hillary can’t break 47%. Despite the incredible and staggering amount of illegal and adverse and biased ramparts behind her. And ALL of the American Media Maggots. 278 contiguous days without hosting an actual open press conference?

Trump is up 38 to 31 with Independents.

I still believe there are any number of Americans who are quiet, who won’t make themselves known, who — on any number of sexual, melanin levels — wait until they take that moment to step into a booth.

We can choose to devolve or evolve.

The corruption is widespread and systemic.

I ask each and every one of you #NeverTrump ‘ers: In 2020, just who is your perfect candidate of choice, The One who is so incredibly a savior and for whom you are so willing to sacrifice four to eight years? Why are they perfect? And why are they more important then than now?

I’m waiting.

BZ