Study: Border Controls Cheaper Than Mass Immigration
by Nick Hallett
Restoring full passport and security checks between European Union (EU) nations would be more cost effective than allowing the migrant crisis to continue indefinitely, a German economic institute has said.
Stop right there.
Isn’t that an excellent argument for the dissolution of the European Union itself?
The Munich-based Ifo institute said the reinstating border controls could reduce the EU’s economic output by 0.19 to 0.47 per cent each year, equivalent to €26.65 to €65.8 billion.
However, Gabriel Felbermayr, head of Ifo, said that these costs would be “just a small part of the amount that would be caused by uncontrolled mass immigration.”
One of the countries that has been worst affected by the ongoing migrant crisis is Sweden, which will likely need to spend around 600 billion kroner to fund last year’s immigration levels.
Stockholm University Associate Professor Jan Tullberg factored in the costs of extra policing and higher benefits along with the immediate costs of receiving so many migrants, and found that the Swedish state will have to spend some 580 billion kroner (£48.3 billion) on these new Swedes from now until the time they either leave the country or die.
Europeans are on a cusp.
A cusp of doom. On the cusp of whether or not their culture will survive an inundation by other cultures who will 1) not assimilate and 2) have radically different values.
Values.
On that same note, in the US, from Pew Research Center polls taken March 17th – 27th of this year:
DO YOU SUPPORT BUILDING A WALL ALONG THE ENTIRE BORDER WITH MEXICO? Overall:
OPPOSE THE WALL 62%
FAVOR THE WALL 34%
Then:
Republicans:
FAVOR THE WALL 63%
OPPOSE THE WALL 33%
Then:
Demorats:
OPPOSE THE WALL 84%
FAVOR THE WALL 13%
A wall on our border with Mexico would save hundreds of lives, perhaps even thousands of lives, here in the US and Mexico.
It would save lives in the US by keeping illegals from murdering lawful American citizens.
It would save lives in Mexico by keeping coyotes from taking advantage of those persons crossing who are murdered and, by those attempting to cross who are unprepared.
That doesn’t even take into account the drug trafficking. And the thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands of American lives ruined because of methamphetamine, cocaine and heroin manufactured and then transported by the Mexican cartels in to the US.
Israel built the wall between itself and the “Palestinian Authority” and it works.
BALTIC SEA – A Russian Sukhoi Su-24 attack aircraft makes a very-low altitude pass by the USS Donald Cook (DDG 75) April 12, 2016. Donald Cook, an Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer, forward deployed to Rota, Spain is conducting a routine patrol in the U.S. 6th Fleet area of operations in support of U.S. national security interests in Europe. (U.S. Navy photo/Released) BALTIC
Both Russia and China are ensuring that they poke their collective fingers into the eyes of the United States, under the “leadership” of Barack Hussein Obama.
They do this, like bullies, because they know they can. They can.
The Russian Sukhoi Su-24 is, truly, not a very good aircraft. It was nothing more than an abject attempt to duplicate the US F-111 with variable geometry wings. In other words, it is a poor copy that Russia had to make do with for years. Russia has copied American aircraft for decades, starting with their knockoff of our B-29 and extending to the Buran, their failed copy of our space shuttle.
050715-N-8163B-009 Atlantic Ocean (July 15, 2005) – The guided missile destroyer USS Donald Cook (DDG 75) conducts a close quarters exercise while underway in the Atlantic Ocean. Donald Cook is assigned to the USS Theodore Roosevelt Carrier Strike Group, currently conducting Joint Task Force Exercise (JTFEX). U.S. Navy photo by Photographer’s Mate Airman Eben Boothby (RELEASED)
In a span of two days last week, Russian aircraft, both fixed wing and rotor, buzzed the USS Donald Cook (DDG 75), an Arleigh Burke class guided missile destroyer built in 1996, 505 feet long and weighing 8,900 tons.
The Cook was taking part in exercises with a Polish helicopter in Baltic Sea international waters, some 70 miles from Kaliningrad. See the map.
USS Donald Cook buzzed again by Russian jets in Baltic
Last Updated Apr 13, 2016 2:55 PM EDT
Yet again Russian jets made provocatively close passes to an American warship, as tensions continue between Moscow and Washington over the conflicts in Ukraine and Syria.
A senior defense official told CBS News that two recent incidents were “more aggressive than anything we’ve seen in some time.”
As documented here. Over two days the USS Donald Cole was buzzed over 30 times.
Navy veterans and pilots agree that the “flybys” are in clear violation of a 1972 international agreement signed by Russia which delineates that aircraft can come no closer than 1,500 feet laterally and lower than a 1,000 foot altitude.
MORE RECENTLY:
On the heels of these flybys was the interception and rollover by a SU-27 of a US KC-`135 reconnaissance four-engined aircraft.
Barrel rolls over plane in latest Baltic Sea provocation
by Bill Gertz
A Russian fighter jet flew dangerously close to a U.S. RC-135 reconnaissance aircraft on Thursday in the latest military provocation by Moscow over the Baltic Sea, the U.S. European Command said Saturday.
“On April 14, a U.S. Air Force RC-135 aircraft flying a routine route in international airspace over the Baltic Sea was intercepted by a Russian Su-27 in an unsafe and unprofessional manner,” said Navy Capt. Danny Hernandez.
“This intercept comes shortly after the unsafe Russian encounters with USS Donald Cook,” he added. “There have been repeated incidents over the last year where Russian military aircraft have come close enough to other air and sea traffic to raise serious safety concerns, and we are very concerned with any such behavior.”
Hernandez said the U.S. aircraft, a militarized Boeing 707 jet, was operating in international airspace “and at no time crossed into Russian territory.”
This is a clear signal by Russia to Barack Hussein Obama and the rest of the planet.
That message is: “The US won’t defend itself. It lacks the will and the courage. So what makes you think they’ll defend you, the Baltic States?”
Truly, an excellent question.
Is Barack Hussein Obama strong, or is he weak?
In the eyes of bullies, he is astoundingly weak. They like that.
If you remember, Syria is where Mr Obama drew his proverbial red line, and then it was crossed. Obama did nothing.
“I use the term stunned because I was stunned by that. It reversed a very complete and comprehensive decision that had just been made a few hours prior to that. The president made the final decision and a few hours later we’re reversing it, we’re pulling it down. It was all over the world.
And our allies would ask me, ‘how can we have confidence in whatever else he says?’ “ — Chuck Hagel, Secretary of Defense, 2013 to 2015
“And so the man who presented himself as a man of peace, has actually presided over much more violence in the Muslim world than happened under his predecessor.” — Nialil Ferguson, Professor of History, Harvard University
Meaning? Barack Hussein Obama, “winner of the Nobel Peace Prize — itself awarded to a man for no accomplishments whatsoever solely due to his melanin count by a council of Guilty Overeducated White People (GOWPs) — is responsible for more death and carnage in the Muslim world due to his arrogance, his haughtiness, his wrong-headedness, his shockingly profound inability to understand the mind of anyone other than himself,
So. Russia builds brand new bases across the Arctic. And China builds islands and increases its sea and land forces, the US under Obama’s direction is considering cutting an Alaskan paratrooper brigade by 71%.
“The lesson is that, it’s what a great power withdraws, the conflict is most likely to escalate. That’s exactly what’s happened. And the result is a sobering one.”
Thank you ever so kindly, Mr Barack Hussein Obama.
And now you know, ladies and gentlemen another why I have never, on this blog, placed the two words “President” and “Obama” together.
It would be an obscenity.
Lastly, think about these quotes from two individuals who served under Obama:
“We’re going to see ourselves potentially in a war that is far greater than what we have experienced in the Middle East given everything that the president of the United States has been told about the complexity and the danger that exists in the world today. Stop the bleeding that you are causing to our armed forces.” — retired Lt. General Mike Flynn
“If the United States doesn’t provide that leadership, nobody else will. Nobody else will.” — former SecDef under Obama, Leon Pannetta
Just as Barack Hussein Obama demanded everyone have ObamaKare — and then exempted the Executive branch and its employees as well as his “good friends” (read: campaign donors) like GE and various labor unions — so Fornicalia Leftists want a $15 an hour “working wage” exemption for themselves.
LA unions call for exemption from $15 minimum wage they fought for
by Jana Kasperkevic
Union leaders say measure could allow for better deals between businesses and labor, with benefits making up for potential lower wages
Los Angeles city council will hear a proposal on Tuesday to exempt union members from a $15 an hour minimum wage that the unions themselves have spent years fighting for.
The proposal for the exemption was first introduced last year, after the Los Angeles city council passed a bill that would see the city’s minimum wage increase to $15 by 2020. After drawing criticism last year, the proposed amendment was put on hold but is now up for consideration once again.
Union leaders argue the amendment would give businesses and unions the freedom to negotiate better agreements, which might include lower wages but could make up the difference in other benefits such as healthcare. They argue that such exemptions might make businesses more open to unionization.
Did you focus in on that last sentence? This is a Leftist move to increase the size of labor unions — which have been diminishing over the years and with that diminishment, their power and influence — and is nothing more than a naked power grab under the guise of being conciliatory to businesses.
Economically, minimum wages may not make sense. But morally, socially, and politically they make every sense because it binds the community together to make sure parents can take care of their kids.
Catch that word “politically”? That’s BrownSpeak for “it’ll help me get re-elected and make me look good for future jobs.”
Was there a reaction to the exemption? Of course there was.
“It’s pretty hypocritical for unions to push a $15 wage law and then exempt themselves from the policy,” Matt Haller, senior vice-president of communications and public affairs at the International Franchise Association, said.
Considering the outcry, Hicks issued another statement last year saying that issues were “in need of further review”. He also pointed out that other cities in California, including San Jose, Oakland, Richmond, San Francisco, Los Angeles and Long Beach have included similar clauses exempting unions in their wage bills.
You see the difference? Everyone else must conform to the law but unions are exempt.
Also at issue are the expanding “right-to-work” laws, which say that no employee can be required to pay any portion of union dues if they do not want to. Absent those laws, unions are otherwise “closed shops”
Further, the Leftist Paradise known as Seattle is currently dealing with its own minimum wage increase issues. It loses jobs and employees whilst surrounding King County benefits by picking up businesses. Its employment is rising just as Seattle’s is decreasing.
Paul Ryan says he doesn’t want to be a presidential candidate.
But for a guy who says he doesn’t want to be a presidential candidate, he’s making a lot of speeches about not wanting to be a presidential candidate. A certain Bill Shakespeare line comes to mind about now.
The GOP is pretty much already convinced that it’s going to lose the presidency.
If it’s Trump or Hillary, the GOP wants Hillary.
If it’s Cruz or Hillary, the GOP wants Hillary.
They just don’t have the testicles to come out openly and say it.
The GOP believes Trump or Cruz lose to Hillary. They’re planning on it.
The GOP is thinking, hell, we may as well lose with “our guy,” whomever “our guy” might turn out to be.
This is American Politics, ladies and gentlemen, politics writ large, and politics writ Establishment. This is the Old Guard Establishment GOP doing everything it can to ensure one of the Usual Suspects gets into the race. The GOP mostly consists of an assload of Surrender Monkeys.
First the GOP was shocked that Jeb Bush didn’t resonate. They were sure he was going to walk right into the presidency. Maybe even Mittens. VP?
Then each one of their other mealy-mouthed do-nothing empty suits fell by the wayside, including Rick Santorum, Mike Huckabee, Lindsay Graham, George Pataki and Jim Gilmore. Hell, my dead cat Mose would have had a better chance at president than Jim Gilmore.
Chris Christie, Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, John Kasich, Carly Fiorina, Bobby Jindal, George Pataki, Scott Walker, Rick Perry — they persevered a while longer until it shook out to the final three.
Count me out: I simply believe that if you want to be the nominee for our party to be the president, you should actually run for it. I chose not to do this, therefore I should not be considered. Period. End of story.
So what is Paul Ryan really saying?
He’s saying there needs to be a back up plan, and that back up plan should include someone from the Old Staid Establishment GOP.
Who ran for president.
Hey.
Wait.
Wouldn’t that be a Jeb Bush or a Mitt Romney or a Lindsay Graham or a Mike Huckabee or a Jeb Bush or a Jeb Bush?
Hey, what about Jeb Bush?
You know, I think Jeb Bush might be available. At a moment’s notice. He speaks Spanish. He loves him some illegal immigrants. Syrians too, I’m sure. Come one, come all, no background checks, it’s an “act of love.”
But wait. Paul Ryan said we need a rule. A new rule. Delegates, we need a new rule. A rule that says to be the nominee, you need to have run in the primary. You need to have been an actual candidate.
Speaking of Paul Ryan, there is the Super Chapter 9. Ryan wants to go along to get along. And bail out PUERTO RICO with American tax dollars.
Look, I don’t trust ANY politician any more. Trusting a politician is a fool’s game and this country is already rife with a sufficient number of Free Cheese Fools.
Charles Krauthammer thinks that Ryan is just trying to rebuild the party early, seeing its destruction in progress.
But the bottom line? If Paul Ryan pulls the Lucy Football on his own denial, I won’t be gobsmacked. He’s done it before, he can do it again. Think: speaker.
BZ
P.S.
53% of those polled think Paul Ryan is lying when he says he won’t accept the presidential nomination according to a Fox poll displayed on the Greta Susteren show, Tuesday.