What voter fraud?

There isn’t enough time or room for me to delineate and refute — with every example — the claim by Leftists, Demorats and the American Media Maggots that there is “no voter fraud.” The examples are beyond legion.

America itself has a history of obstructing elections, specifically under the Barack Hussein Obama regime. The first instance would be that of Israel. From the JerusalemPost.com:

Obama’s shocking interference into Israel’s election process

by Barry Shaw, 2-3-15

Benjamin Netanyahu received the invitation to address Congress from House Speaker, John Boehner, shortly after President Obama had warned Congress in his State of Union Address that he would veto any move they may make to strengthen sanctions against Iran in pursuit of a nuclear weapon.

Israel had released a video purporting to show an undisclosed Iranian intercontinental ballistic missile site, and Netanyahu was concerned that the Obama Administration was on its way to signing an agreement with Iran while Israel was embroiled in elections. So he accepted Boehner’s invitation.

Once again, it was the right thing for the Israeli leader to do.

But a furious Obama White House threatened “there would be a price” to pay for Bibi’s visit to Washington. 

Now we discover what that price is. 

This is a running theme with Barack Hussein Obama. Retribution? Revenge? Obama was all about retribution, revenge and particularly division — the hallmarks of his regime. Then and now.

The Obama presidential election team has set up camp in Tel Aviv with the mission to defeat Netanyahu in our upcoming election.

The “Anyone but Bibi” mission is headed by Jeremy Bird, Obama’s National Field Director in his successful presidential campaigns.

Under Bird, a group called “Victory 15” has been set up. It has recruited the young activists from Israel’s 2013 social protest movement and will man a massive social network and personal contact campaign to defeat Bibi. V15 is financed by an NGO called “One Voice” whose motto is to be “the voice of mainstream Israelis and Palestinians.” Research finds that One Voice is funded by John Kerry’s State Department.

In its press release, V15 calls itself “non partisan” which is clearly a lie. Its aim is solely to defeat Bibi, 

Here’s the crux of the biscuit right here.

Obama’s excuse for not meeting with Netanyahu in Washington was that he couldn’t be seen interfering in the Israeli election process. But the White House and the State Department is now exposed as seriously interfering in Israeli politics with the Obama team, financed by the Obama Administration, working to unseat Benjamin Netanyahu and his party in Israel’s upcoming election.

The second instance would be that of Indiana under then-governor Mike Pence. From the DailyCaller.com:

EXCLUSIVE: Obama’s Feds Tried to Hack Indiana’s Election System While Pence Was Governor

by Richard Pollock, 2-21-17

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials tried to hack Indiana’s state electoral system with at least 14,800 “scans” or hits between Nov. 1, 2016, to Dec. 16, 2016, The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group has learned.

The attacks are the second confirmed IT scanning assault by DHS officials against states that resisted then-President Barack Obama’s attempt to increase federal involvement in state and local election systems by designating them as “critical infrastructure” for national security.

Indiana Secretary of State Connie Lawson, the incoming president of the association, told TheDCNF Tuesday that, “we know that between November 1 and December 16 we were scanned with about 14,800 scans, nearly 15,000 different times.”

The state’s IT team traced the intruder to a DHS computer’s IP address. The same DHS unit attempted 10 times in 2016 to hack into the Georgia electoral system.

Federal officials are barred under DHS rules from trying to penetrate a state system without the express approval of the state. Neither Georgia nor Indiana approved the DHS scanning attempts.

By the way, that was when Mike Pence was Indiana’s governor.

Please note that Mr Obama stated there can be no voter fraud and no “rigged elections” because they are “so decentralized.” Remember this insistence? Hold that thought.

But wait. Who actually attempted to hack American election infrastructure for punitive reasons and was caught doing so red-handed? That’s right, the DHS/NSA under Mr Obama — as I indicated — because certain states refused to go along with the Obama administration’s insistence that their election systems do become centralized. From ZeroHedge.com:

In Stunning Last Minute Power Grab, Obama Designates Election Systems As “Critical Infrastructure”

by Tyler Durden

In a stunning last minute power grab by the Obama administration with just 14 days left in his Presidency, the Department of Homeland Security released a statement this evening officially declaring state election systems to be “critical infrastructure.”  The statement from DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson defines “election infrastructure” as “storage facilities, polling places, centralized vote tabulations locations, voter registration databases, voting machines” and all “other systems” to manage the election process…so pretty much everything.

I have determined that election infrastructure in this country should be designated as a subsector of the existing Government Facilities critical infrastructure sector. Given the vital role elections play in this country, it is clear that certain systems and assets of election infrastructure meet the definition of critical infrastructure, in fact and in law.

I have reached this determination so that election infrastructure will, on a more formal and enduring basis, be a priority for cybersecurity assistance and protections that the Department of Homeland Security provides to a range of private and public sector entities. By “election infrastructure,” we mean storage facilities, polling places, and centralized vote tabulations locations used to support the election process, and information and communications technology to include voter registration databases, voting machines, and other systems to manage the election process and report and display results on behalf of state and local governments.

But wait. Just what was this, other than a naked attempt to literally subvert the Constitution to achieve the goal of federalizing elections under the guise of security. Translation: “it’s for the children.”

Imagine that. Guaranteed you never heard of those situations. But that’s why you read my blog and listen to my show, BZ’s Berserk Bobcat Saloon Radio Show.

What I shall do now is lay forth the examples, with attributions, from article after article, from sources all over the United States. indicating that, as opposed to what the LDAMM (Leftists, Demorats and American Media Maggots) insist, yes, voter fraud not only exists, but it is rampant.

Let’s start with the first and obvious thing that the LDAMM bleat about incessantly: ID required for voting. You know. To keep the foundational cornerstone of America honest. That would seem to be a priority to clear thinking individuals.

Yet the LDAMM and GOWPs (Guilty Overeducated White People) won’t have it. No logic allowed. Not voter ID allowed. Anyone and everyone should be able to vote for anything, any where, with no substantiation or verification required at all.

Five-year-olds know that is a recipe for failure and corruption. And I apologize for insulting five-year-olds in comparison to the LDAMM.

A classic place to begin.

So wait. American blacks think that what GOWPs are saying about them is insulting them. Facts in evidence.

Let’s begin by observing that in 2019, Tom Fitton’s Judicial Watch had to sue the County of Los Angeles to do the job that it should have been doing for years and years.

What voter fraud?

Not just Los Angeles. Every major American city, and every county in the United States of America should have been scouring their voter lists diligently. Do you think they have? Of course not. Why would they? Packed and ancient voter rolls generally benefit the Demorats. Tom Fitton had to sue to get government to do its job.

Lawsuit Spurs CA to Begin Massive 1.5M ‘Inactive’ Voter Roll Cleanup

by Tammy Waitt, 6-21-19

Judicial Watch has been informed that Los Angeles County has sent notices to as many as 1.5 million inactive voters on its voter rolls, in a step toward removing the names of voters who have moved, died, or are otherwise ineligible to vote.

The massive mailing is the result of a settlement agreement with Judicial Watch requiring the county to remove as many as 1.5 million inactive registrations.

Let’s begin with one fundamental problem. Mail-in voting due to Wuhan-19. You know, the thing pushed by Demorats due to Fear Porn. YOU CAN’T WALK SAFELY INTO THE POLLS AND EXPECT TO CAST YOUR VOTE!

Dr Fauci says you can do it.

Joe Biden voted in person for the Delaware primary in September.

The Demorats say: youi can’t vote in person. So that’s the marching order given to the American Media Maggots, which they carry with inspiration and glee. Anything to remove OMB.

So let’s try an experiment. CBS did.

Vote-by-mail experiment reveals potential problems within postal voting system ahead of November election

Mail-in voting, for many, is as simple as sending a letter, but rules vary across the country for when a voter can get their ballot and when it should be returned. In 2016, more than 73,000 out of 33 million mail-in ballots arrived too late to be counted.

What voter fraud?

The US Postal Service is no more prepared for this kind of explosion in volume and demand than the man in the moon. It is literally unprecedented. But that’s the point. If you Cloward-Piven the USPS, you help Trump lose.

So let’s be clear: there is a massive differentiation between “voting by mail” and absentee voting. In “voting by mail” everyone gets a ballot sent in the mail. Your dog, your dead Aunt Phoebe, people who lived in your apartment ten years ago.

With an absentee ballot — because that’s how I’ve voted for years — I had to purposely sign up at the voting office, provide ID, and swear that I wouldn’t go to my local polls in order to vote twice.

Because the US Postal Service is now under President Trump, and people are questioning the ability of the USPS to deliver the volume anticipated, Postmaster General Louis DeJoy must be in cahoots with Russia.

Why wouldn’t you want to tear down every occupier of a position during the Trump administration? As an aside, the Postmaster General is not appointed by the president, but by a postal board of governors with the advice and consent of the US Senate.

Then there’s the post office itself. No bias there, right? Stuff that’s been going on long before President Trump arrived. From CNN:

Report: USPS improperly enabled workers who helped Clinton campaign

by Eli Watkins, 7-19-17

Washington (CNN)A government investigation concluded that the United States Postal Service “improperly coordinated” with a postal workers union that supported Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

The investigation, as documented in a report from the Office of Special Counsel, said the USPS granted employees union leave time off, at the request of the union, to do political activity — which OSC concluded was a “systematic violation” of a law regarding the political activity of federal employees.
The report said the practice was longstanding, perhaps ranging as far back as the 1990s.
The report came in response to a request from Wisconsin Republican Sen. Ron Johnson, who chairs a Senate committee that held a hearing Wednesday on the matter and asked representatives of government watchdogs why it went on so long. William Siemer, the acting deputy inspector general of the USPS’s inspector general’s office, indicated it was a case of institutional inertia.
“It seemed that it was adopted just as a practice where nobody was really looking at it through the lens of is this appropriate or not,” Siemer said.

The bias for Demorats is deeply ingrained and institutional in the USPS.

Attorney General Bill Barr discussed mail-in voting with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer.

Voter fraud exists. Some people will actually tell you how they do it.

Confessions of a voter fraud: I was a master at fixing mail-in ballots

by Jon Levine, 8-29-20

A top Democratic operative says voter fraud, especially with mail-in ballots, is no myth. And he knows this because he’s been doing it, on a grand scale, for decades.

Mail-in ballots have become the latest flashpoint in the 2020 elections. While President Trump and the GOP warn of widespread manipulation of the absentee vote that will swell with COVID polling restrictions, many Democrats and their media allies have dismissed such concerns as unfounded.

But the political insider, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he fears prosecution, said fraud is more the rule than the exception. His dirty work has taken him through the weeds of municipal and federal elections in Paterson, Atlantic City, Camden, Newark, Hoboken and Hudson County and his fingerprints can be found in local legislative, mayoral and congressional races across the Garden State. Some of the biggest names and highest office holders in New Jersey have benefited from his tricks, according to campaign records The Post reviewed.

“An election that is swayed by 500 votes, 1,000 votes — it can make a difference,” the tipster said. “It could be enough to flip states.”

As radio host Hugh Hewitt wrote in his 2004 book “If It’s Not Close, They Can’t Cheat.” Remember that phrase.

The whisteblower — whose identity, rap sheet and long history working as a consultant to various campaigns were confirmed by The Post — says he not only changed ballots himself over the years, but led teams of fraudsters and mentored at least 20 operatives in New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania — a critical 2020 swing state.

The fixers and fraudsters are all Leftist in nature or Demorats.

A Bernie Sanders die-hard with no horse in the presidential race, he said he felt compelled to come forward in the hope that states would act now to fix the glaring security problems present in mail-in ballots.

What voter fraud?

Then here it comes.

He would have his operatives fan out, going house to house, convincing voters to let them mail completed ballots on their behalf as a public service. The fraudster and his minions would then take the sealed envelopes home and hold them over boiling water.

That’s called “ballot harvesting.” That’s legal in Kalifornia.

He then would remove the real ballot, place the counterfeit ballot inside the signed certificate, and reseal the envelope.

“Five minutes per ballot tops,” said the insider.

And the fraudster confirmed what we already suspected. Now we know.

The tipster said sometimes postal employees are in on the scam.

“You have a postman who is a rabid anti-Trump guy and he’s working in Bedminster or some Republican stronghold … He can take those [filled-out] ballots, and knowing 95% are going to a Republican, he can just throw those in the garbage.”

In some cases, mail carriers were members of his “work crew,” and would sift ballots from the mail and hand them over to the operative.

Nursing homes. Great for ballot harvesting. Great for Governor Cuomo.

Hitting up assisted-living facilities and “helping” the elderly fill out their absentee ballots was a gold mine of votes, the insider said.

“There are nursing homes where the nurse is actually a paid operative. And they go room by room by room to these old people who still want to feel like they’re relevant,” said the whistleblower. “[They] literally fill it out for them.”

Then:

When all else failed, the insider would send operatives to vote live in polling stations, particularly in states like New Jersey and New York that do not require voter ID. Pennsylvania, also for the most part, does not.

The best targets were registered voters who routinely skip presidential or municipal elections — information which is publicly available.

What voter fraud?

The tipster said New Jersey homeless shelters offered a nearly inexhaustible pool of reliable — buyable — voters.

“They get to register where they live in and they go to the polls and vote,” he said, laughing at the roughly $174 per vote Mike Bloomberg spent to win his third mayoral term. He said he could have delivered the same result at a 70 percent discount — like when Frank “Pupie” Raia, a real estate developer and Hoboken nabob, was convicted last year on federal charges for paying low-income residents 50 bucks a pop to vote how he wanted during a 2013 municipal election.

And the inaccuracies and in efficiencies of mail-in balloting have already been proven in New York.

Over 80,000 mail-in ballots disqualified in NYC primary mess

by Carl Campanile, Holan Hicks and Bernadette Hogan, 8-5-20

The mail-in ballots of more than 84,000 New York City Democrats who sought to vote in the presidential primary were disqualified, according to new figures released by the Board of Elections.

The city BOE received 403,103 mail-in ballots for the June 23 Democratic presidential primary.

But the certified results released Wednesday revealed that only 318,995 mail-in ballots were counted.

That means 84,108 ballots were not counted or invalidated — 21 percent of the total.

And that’s just a sampling of what’s to come nationally. What if a full ONE FIFTH of national ballots in the November election weren’t counted?

And primarily who’s ballots wouldn’t get counted? Correct. Republicans. Because the R and the D are printed on the outside of EVERY ballot return envelope. It’s there if you look for it.

One out of four mail-in ballots were disqualified for arriving late, lacking a postmark or failing to include a voter’s signature, or other defects. The Post reported Tuesday that roughly 30,000 mail-in ballots were invalidated in Brooklyn alone.

But hey — who’s counting — literally? What voter fraud?

This is the perfect scam. Absentee ballots uncounted because the New York return envelopes are “pre-paid” metered mail and, to be counted, ballots must be post-marked with a date. Pre-paid envelopes aren’t post-marked with a date in New York.

This just New York. What happens nationally?

Then there’s the voter fraud in Nevada.

Florida voter fraud.

What voter fraud?

However, it appears one Demorat seems to know that voter fraud is real, specifically ballot harvesting.

Like I mentioned earlier — just why is it that primarily Republican ballots get “lost” or “misplaced” or in this case, tossed in the garbage?

FBI investigates ballots for Trump found in Pennsylvania garbage

by Steven Nelson, 9-24-20

The Justice Department on Thursday said the FBI has opened an investigation into nine absentee ballots — seven cast for President Trump — that were found in the garbage near Scranton, Pennsylvania.

Trump routinely expresses doubt about the reliability of mail-in voting amid the COVID-19 pandemic and the investigation quickly became national news.

“At this point we can confirm that a small number of military ballots were discarded,” US Attorney David Freed said in a statement.

“Investigators have recovered nine ballots at this time. Some of those ballots can be attributed to specific voters and some cannot. Of the nine ballots that were discarded and then recovered, 7 were cast for presidential candidate Donald Trump,” Freed said.

“Two of the discarded ballots had been resealed inside their appropriate envelopes by Luzerne elections staff prior to recovery by the FBI and the contents of those 2 ballots are unknown.”

But even Fox News is “burying the lead,” because if you read the story, these aren’t really absentee ballots in Virginia. These are mail-in ballots. The nomenclature is entirely incorrect.

Virginia counties see multiple absentee ballots sent to more than 1,000 voters

by Michael Ruiz, 9-25-20

More than 1,000 Virginia voters who applied for absentee ballots have received an extra one in the mail, state Republican Party officials said Friday.

The mix-up comes shortly after a Democratic push to expand absentee voting in a bid to reduce the spread of the coronavirus. As a result, absentee ballots no longer require an excuse, and any registered voter is allowed to request one.

“We knew the Democrats many last-minute changes to our election law would make our elections less secure, but no one could imagine voters receiving two ballots,” Rich Anderson, the state’s GOP chairman, said in a statement.

Republicans knew it. Why didn’t Demorats know it? Oh, they knew. Knew it was going to benefit themselves.

And occasionally saner heads prevail.

Appellate court halts Wisconsin ballot-counting extension

Associated Press, 9-27-20

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A federal appeals court has temporarily halted a six-day extension for counting absentee ballots in Wisconsin.

The decision Sunday by the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is a momentary victory for Republicans and President Donald Trump in the key presidential battleground state.

As it stands, ballots will now be due by 8 p.m. on Election Day.

A lower court judge had sided with Democrats and their allies to extend the deadline until Nov. 9.

Democrats sought more time as a way to help deal with an expected historic high number of absentee ballots.

Why should anyone be allowed to vote after voting day? Polls have closed nationally by midnight at the latest.

There was voter fraud occurring in Virginia even before the Demorats officially began pushing for mail-in balloting “due to Wuhan-19.”

Okay. Stop right there.

Because that’s where the “investigation” ends, right?

“Nothing to see here,” the TV station claims. “We’ve done all the inquiries you need. Case settled,” they insist.

They have incurious minds, like most “journalists” today. I don’t. I wanted to know more. My nose perked up. Something didn’t quite pass the smell test.

These mailers were sent by a “non-profit” and “non-partisan” private group called the Center For Voter Information. They’re “non-partisan” because they say they are. You believe that? I have the internet. Let’s look.

Under ABOUT US on the website, two people are predominantly featured. First is Page Gardner, listed as “CVI’s founder and board chair.”

Who is Page Gardner? Let’s look.

She’s an author at the Huffington Post. That’s a clue.

She’s on InfluenceWatch.org — where she’s listed as:

“Page Gardner is a left-of-center activist who runs the Voter Participation Center, formerly the Women’s Voices, Women Vote organization. Gardner works to try and register unmarried women to vote; unmarried women tend to vote Democratic.”

And furthermore, in the very next paragraph, she has an admitted and documented history of doing exactly what happened to Virginians.

Gardner worked for Bill Clinton’s 1992 presidential campaign and maintained professional ties to the Clintons. She attempted to register voters to help Hillary Clinton’s campaign in 2008; she faced criticism after Women’s Voices: Women Vote registration mailers in North Carolina went out after the primary election registration deadline, confusing some voters. [1]

Gardner’s tactics to try and register people to vote have drawn criticism from elections officials all over the country. She has been accused of using misleading mailers among other things.

Exactly what occurred in Virginia.

And this is in her history.

In 2016, the Voter Participation Center sent out letters in Colorado that said “Government Document enclosed” on the front. It also said that recipients were either 18 or about to turn 18 although most recipients were already registered to vote. Gardner defended the letters by saying that states do not keep lists of people who were not registered to vote and they had to create the list by other means.

But wait. There’s more.

In 2020, similar letters were sent out by the Voter Participation Center across the country. Many of the recipients believed the letters came from government agencies and not from an outside group.

Exactly what occurred in Virginia, except “across the country.”

In addition, some letters were addressed to family pets. Some election officials believed the letter contributed to voter confusion.

C’mon man! Why shouldn’t my pet register to vote?

Page Gardner did the exact same thing with the “Voter Participation Center.”

Since 2004, the Voter Participation Center claims to have “signed up 2.7 million voters.”[6] However, the group’s efforts have been criticized for being imprecise,[7]  misleading,[8] ineffective,[9] and potentially illegal.[10] Moreover, the group’s ties to the Clinton family and the liberal agitation group MoveOn.org have drawn questions about the group’s purported non-partisanship.[11]

Her true identity is also revealed here:

The Voter Participation Center was founded under the name “Women’s Voices Women Vote,” a 501(c)(3) charity focused on registering single women to vote.[12] Page Gardner, a former Democratic operative whose first race was the late Sen. Ted Kennedy’s (D-Massachusetts) 1980 presidential bid, and her friend Chris Dresser founded the original Women’s Voices Women Vote group.[13] John PodestaHillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign chairman and a senior aide to President Bill Clinton and President Barack Obama, was also said to have “helped launch the Women’s Voices Women Vote prior to the 2004 presidential election and later served on the board.”[14]

That website contains much more information.and detail about Page and friends.

Yup. That Page Gardner and CVI — stultifyingly “unaffiliated.”

Page Gardner is listed here also, at Women’s Voices Women Vote Action Fund, described as

Ms. Gardner was a pioneer in recognizing unmarried women as a key political population, and was one of the first to identify and understand the implications of the “marriage gap” between unmarried and married women in their registration and voting behaviors.

I speak Leftist, so I’ll translate: married women can go to hell. They tend to be more family-driven, obviously, and also tend to be a tad more Conservative.

She is further described as “an innovator in metrics-based voter registration and turnout outreach,”

Not wanting him to feel left out, the Center For Voter Information ABOUT US also mentions Tom Lopach as CVI’s chief executive officer. BallotPedia says:

Tom Lopach is a Democratic political advisor in the state of Montana. He served as chief of staff to Gov. Steve Bullock (D) from 2017 to 2019, when he began serving on Bullock’s 2020 presidential campaign.[1] Lopach is the former executive director of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) and former chief of staff to Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.).[2]

He worked for Bill Clinton, Ted Kennedy, Jon Tester, and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

You guessed it. Totally unaffiliated.

Something tells me that I think you’re starting to identify something of a trend here. I don’t know. Call me crazy, but Page Gardner doesn’t really sound “unaffiliated” to me, or Tom, and the Center For Voter Information doesn’t really sound “unaffiliated” to me. It instead sounds rather “afilliated.”

I speak Leftist, so I’ll translate: Page Gardner’s site LIED about being “unaffiliated,” and ABC 13 Virginia Beach conducted a shallow, biased, lazy and shitty “investigation.” Air quotes.

Now I’ll readily admit, I’m no journalist, brain surgeon or rocket scientist. I don’t claim to be. All I am is an ancient, hairy, obese reprobate with a blog and a radio show.

But I also have something else: a curiosity and willingness to do the job the American Media Maggots won’t. And something that apparently the American Media Maggots don’t have access to at work: the internet.

One additional point. I didn’t discover this on Google. Oh no. I went to Duck-Duck-Go. That is also called a clue.

We have to ask ourselves: why would the Center for Voter Information — clearly partisan, biased, and deeply affiliated with the Demorats and Leftists — have conducted themselves in this manner, in Virginia?

In my opinion? VOTER FRAUD. And THIS is how those who want to commit voter fraud acquire YOUR SIGNATURE, your INFORMATION, and your PARTY AFFILIATION. You know — so they can direct others to recognize which Republican votes or votes for Trump others can pitch in the trash.

Because: do you think all of these organization don’t talk to each other? Of course they do. They’re all the same people.

Then there was the recent James O’Keefe video from Project Veritas. Oooopsie.

Here, we discover that ballot harvesting and outright voter fraud either by intimidation or for cash is occurring in Ilhan Omar’s district with the Somali population.

There are many more videos, so please visit the site, Project Veritas, itself.

In that vein, the NYPost.com wrote:

Minneapolis police probing alleged ballot harvesting plot helping Rep. Omar

by Lee Brown, 9-29-20

A police investigation has been launched into the alleged ballot harvesting plot helping progressive “Squad” member Rep. Ilhan Omar.

“ALLEGATIONS OF VOTER FRAUD BEING EVALUATED,” the Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) announced on Twitter Monday, hours after President Trump called for an investigation into the “misdeeds.”

“The MPD is aware of the allegations of vote harvesting. We are in the process of looking into the validity of those statements,” the department said.

The force added that “no further information is available at this time,” including whether the Democratic congresswoman would be involved in the initial investigation.

Are we done with Demorat voter fraud? Of course not.

Biden’s Texas Political Director Implicated in Massive Mail-In Ballot Harvesting Scheme in Harris County

by Debra Heine, 9-28-20

Biden Campaign operative in Texas is attempting to rig the 2020 election with the help of others in a massive ballot harvesting scheme, according to two private investigators who testified under oath that they have “video evidence, documentation and witnesses” to prove it. With the help of mass mail-in ballots, the illegal ballot harvesting operation could harvest 700,000 ballots, one Harris County Democrat operative allegedly bragged.

Because why not? That’s a significant accomplishment.

The investigators—a former FBI agent and former police officer—claim that Biden’s Texas Political Director Dallas Jones and his cohorts have been “hoarding mail-in and absentee ballots” and ordering operatives to them fill out for people in Harris County illegally, “including dead people, homeless people, and nursing home residents in the 2020 presidential election,”  Patrick Howley of the National File reported.

And now back to Brooklyn, NY.

Nearly 100,000 Brooklyn Voters Got Wrong Ballot Return Envelopes

by Joshua Caplan, 9-29-20

The New York City Board of Elections on Tuesday admitted that nearly 100,000 Brooklyn voters received absentee ballot return envelopes with the wrong address and names labeled on them.

CNN reports:

Valerie Vazquez-Diaz, a spokesperson for the board, told CNN the issue affected 99,477 voters. She blamed a third-party vendor, Phoenix Graphics, which had been contracted to print and mail the ballots to voters in Brooklyn and Queens. CNN has reached out to the company for comment.

Michael Ryan, the election board’s executive director, said at a meeting on Tuesday afternoon that the city has ordered the vendor to remail new ballots “to make certain that absolutely no disenfranchisement occurs in the borough of Brooklyn.”

Smell test.

“There’s just mass confusion about these ballots and what people are supposed to do with them,” Democrat Van Bramer said in an interview with the Post. “People were already not trusting this process and they were already not trusting the Board of Elections to count the ballot right.”

Now over to Queens, NY:

Report: New York City Voters Wrongly Receive Mail-in Ballots Labeled for Military Use

by Joshua Caplan, 9-28-20

Queens, New York City, voters have received mail-in ballots marked for military use even though recipients never served in the armed forces, according to a Monday report.

What voter fraud?

We couldn’t leave out the GOWPs in Colorado.

Colorado Secretary of State Encourages Non-Citizens, Deceased to Register to Vote

by Kyle Olson, 9-27-20

Democrat Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold sent a postcard to non-citizens and the dead encouraging them to register to vote so they can cast ballots in November.

Griswold sent a mailer to several people who are not eligible to vote, CBS4 reported, in a swing state that has a U.S. Senate seat on the ballot this year and could prove pivotal in the presidential race.

Karen Anderson said she received one addressed to her mother.

“Which sounds really nice except my mother has been dead four years and she hasn’t lived, voted, owned property, worked, or done anything other than visit Colorado since 1967,” Anderson told the news station.

CBS4 found a dozen other examples, including “a deceased woman in Las Animas County, six migrant workers in Otero County, a Canadian in Douglas County, a man from Lebanon in Jefferson County, and a British citizen in Arapahoe County.”

And for good measure, I must report this as well, from Pennsylvania:

DA files charges against Allentown elections judge who darkened dots on ballots in Pa. House race

by Andrew Wagaman, 10-5-20

Lehigh County District Attorney Jim Martin on Monday announced charges against an elections judge in Allentown’s 3rd Ward who was accused of tampering with ballots during the Democratic primary race for state representative between Enid Santiago and Peter Schweyer.

Everett “Erika” Bickford was charged with two election code violations: insertion and alteration of entries in documents, and prying into ballots, both misdemeanors.

That’s just the tip of the iceberg for one post or show.

Look, let’s be honest. There is absolutely no reason whatsoever that people can’t vote in person. There is absolutely no need to flood voters with mail-in ballots, and no reason to crash the US Postal Service which, in truth, isn’t even remotely prepared to handle the crush.

This is purposeful. This is the Demorats trying to place ballot turds in the national punchbowl in an effort to confuse voters and sow anarchy across the US.

This is no coincidence. This was planned.

So the next time someone asks you, “what voter fraud?”

Point them here.

BZ

 

 

The TRUTH about Social Media

The most revelatory and accurate video you’ll see this month.

Watch before it disappears. It will.

Because that’s what social media does to truth — it makes truth disappear.

BZ

 

 

BZ’s Berserk Bobcat Saloon Radio Show, Thursday, 10-1-20, with returning special guest Rev. RALPH J CHITTAMS, SR.

Hours 1 & 2BZ spoke with Reverend RALPH J CHITTAMS, SR, about politics, religion, race, blacks in America, abortion and the terrible ruination this country is suffering at the hands of Leftists. Of course, how could we leave out Wuhan-19, President Trump, the American Media Maggots, Leftist violence, burning cities and, of course, the lack of systemic racism in the United States.

As BZ posed audio cuts and topics, PASTOR RALPH J CHITTAMS SR continued to amaze and astound with his clarity and honesty on any number of topics. To say that RALPH is a breath of fresh air is almost to minimize fresh air. There is no more plainly-spoken man of faith on the planet, and that is absolutely invigorating.

Click on the yellow button to listen to the show, audio only, on Spreaker.

Listen to “BZ’s BBS, Thursday, 10-1-20, w/RALPH J CHITTAMS SR” on Spreaker.

If you care to watch the show on the SHR Media YouTube channel, click on the red arrow below. We kindly ask you to SUBSCRIBE to the SHR Media channel.

Join me, the Bloviating Zeppelin every Tuesday and Thursday night on the SHR Media Network from 11 PM to 1 AM Eastern and 8 PM to 10 PM Pacific, at the Berserk Bobcat Saloon — where the speech is free but the booze is not.

  • Want to listen to all the Berserk Bobcat Saloon archives on SpreakerGo here.
  • Want to listen to the Saloon on iHeart radio? Click here.
  • Like Apple products? You can listen to the Saloon here on Apple Podcasts.
  • Want to listen to the show on the huge Podcast AddictClick on this.
  • Do you like Spotify? You can listen to the Saloon via Spotify right here.
  • Want to watch past shows on the SHR Media Facebook page? Go here.
  • Want to watch past Berserk Bobcat Saloon shows on YouTubeGo here.

Thank you one and all for listening, watching and supporting the SHR Media Network: “Conservative Media Done Right.”

BZ

 

 

BZ’s Berserk Bobcat Saloon Radio Show, Tuesday, 9-29-20, with guest ALEX EPSTEIN, founder of the Center for Industrial Progress

Hour 1: BZ spoke to a new guest on the show, ALEX EPSTEIN of the Center for Industrial Progress, whose book “The Moral Case For Fossil Fuels” seems, these days, massively counterintuitive at best.

But perhaps not. Perhaps not at all.

Instead, ALEX EPSTEIN talked about energy poverty, the hardships placed upon people in those categories, the fallacy that wind and solar can be a consistently-reliable  substitute for fossil fuels — and also considering the bulk of the equipment for same isn’t even manufactured in the United States, but China instead.

Check EPSTEIN’s excellent website EnergyTalkingPoints.com, a great resource!

Hour 2: BZ then regaled the tale of the Chinese spy in Senator Diane Feinstein’s office for roughly twenty years — and why she acquired the consideration of a “heads-up.”

But Donald John Trump never did.

You know why. Politics.

He wasn’t a Demorat.

BZ also discussed the corrupt FBI, former Director Jimmy “The Leak” Comey, fired by President Trump. And the lies promulgated by the FBI in order to derail the Trump presidency by acquiring a FISA warrant for surveillance against the Trump campaign, predicated upon false information and lies.

Equating to an actual soft coup against a presidential nominee, a president-elect, and a sitting president.

Thanks to Comcast, the entire internet went down in the studio for about five minutes, killing both YouTube and Facebook video streams, and interrupting the Spreaker (audio only) broadcast — but then picking it back up.

Thusly, there is no video available for this episode whatsoever.

Here is Part I on Spreaker.

Listen to “BZ’s BBS, Tuesday, 9-29-20, w/ALEX EPSTEIN — Part I” on Spreaker.

Here is Part II on Spreaker, resumed after the internet interruption.

Listen to “BZ’s BBS, Tuesday, 9-29-20, w/ALEX EPSTEIN — Part II” on Spreaker.

Join me, the Bloviating Zeppelin every Tuesday and Thursday night on the SHR Media Network from 11 PM to 1 AM Eastern and 8 PM to 10 PM Pacific, at the Berserk Bobcat Saloon — where the speech is free but the booze is not.

  • Want to listen to all the Berserk Bobcat Saloon archives on SpreakerGo here.
  • Want to listen to the Saloon on iHeart radio? Click here.
  • Like Apple products? You can listen to the Saloon here on Apple Podcasts.
  • Want to listen to the show on the huge Podcast AddictClick on this.
  • Do you like Spotify? You can listen to the Saloon via Spotify right here.
  • Want to watch past shows on the SHR Media Facebook page? Go here.
  • Want to watch past Berserk Bobcat Saloon shows on YouTubeGo here.

Thank you one and all for listening, watching and supporting the SHR Media Network: “Conservative Media Done Right.”

BZ

 

 

RBG: will the GOP Senate do the right thing?

Since the passing of US Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Friday, September 18th, at home, at the age of 87, the world has turned upside down. Many issues are on the table.

Her personal life and her impact has already been discussed in ways I can’t begin to address and won’t. What I will do is address her politics and then the politics of “okay, so what next”?

Personally I’m sure she was a good woman — and it’s clear she had numerous challenges in her life, from her multiple bouts with cancer to her husband Marvin passing at the age of 78 back in 2010 of metastatic cancer himself.

That’s the personal aside. Now to politics. And that is this, which apparently no one save me seemed to notice or much care about.

How can an actual sitting Associate Supreme Court Justice eschew the United States Constitution when talking with a foreign power — in this case Egypt — about creating their own constitution?

If she doesn’t recommend our Constitution to anyone else in 2012, how can she be trusted to uphold it when anything comes before her?

Why would that be? I submit: positive vs negative rights.

The US Constitution is crafted in such a way as to tell our government what it can’t do against its citizens.

The rights granted United States citizens come from God, not government.

Our rights are “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” as set forth in the Declaration of Independence. Nowhere does any document guarantee any outcome whatsoever, nor should it. Opportunity? Of course so. For everyone.

However, it is the responsibility of persons to act, well, responsibly.

The vacancy created? We know that nature abhors a vacuum. And whereas before, Republicans were historically hesitant to wield power when they had it, it appears Mitch McConnell is set to deliver againin re Merrick Garland.

Of course, that’s when the threats and screaming began.

Senate Minority Leader Chuckie Schumer also started screaming. And the body hadn’t even cooled yet on the 18th.

Schumer: Ruth Bader Ginsburg seat should be filled by next president

by Jordain Carney, 9-18-20

Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Friday night that the Senate should wait until next year to fill the Supreme Court seat left vacant by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg‘s death.

“The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president,” Schumer said in a tweet.

Schumer’s tweet comes less than an hour after news broke that Ginsburg had died Friday at 87, throwing a landmine into an already chaotic presidential election year.

Schumer’s tweet is a word-for-word copy of a statement Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) released in 2016 after the election-year death of the late conservative Justice Antonin Scalia.

It also points to the looming battle over whether Senate Republicans will try to fill the seat in an election year, after leaving Scalia’s seat open until 2017 when President Trump appointed and the GOP-controlled Senate confirmed Justice Neil Gorsuch.

As the revered Barack Hussein Obama once chirped at Republicans, “elections have consequences.”

Did you ever know Demorats not to wield power when they had it? Hold back? Become remarkably circumspect, packed with good tidings, bipartisanship and compromise? Fuck no.

In a role reversal, do you possibly think they’d stop from filling the SCOTUS vacancy? Not on your damned life.

Also, the NationalReview.com wrote:

History Is on the Side of Republicans Filling a Supreme Court Vacancy in 2020

by Dan McLaughlin, 8-7-20

Choosing not to fill a vacancy would be a historically unprecedented act of unilateral disarmament.

If a Supreme Court vacancy opens up between now and the end of the year, Republicans should fill it. Given the vital importance of the Court to rank-and-file Republican voters and grassroots activists, particularly in the five-decade-long quest to overturn Roe v. Wade, it would be political suicide for Republicans to refrain from filling a vacancy unless some law or important traditional norm was against them. There is no such law and no such norm; those are all on their side. Choosing not to fill a vacancy would be a historically unprecedented act of unilateral disarmament. It has never happened once in all of American history. There is no chance that the Democrats, in the same position, would ever reciprocate, as their own history illustrates.

History supports Republicans filling the seat. Doing so would not be in any way inconsistent with Senate Republicans’ holding open the seat vacated by Justice Antonin Scalia in 2016. The reason is simple, and was explained by Mitch McConnell at the time. Historically, throughout American history, when their party controls the Senate, presidents get to fill Supreme Court vacancies at any time — even in a presidential election year, even in a lame-duck session after the election, even after defeat. Historically, when the opposite party controls the Senate, the Senate gets to block Supreme Court nominees sent up in a presidential election year, and hold the seat open for the winner. Both of those precedents are settled by experience as old as the republic. Republicans should not create a brand-new precedent to deviate from them.

I bet Biden wishes he hadn’t said this.

So: yes, President Trump did consult with the Senate. Check. And mate.

Does anyone remember what occurred with nominee Clarence Thomas in 1991?

Because, well, if you’re voting for Trump, “you ain’t black.”

“Come on, man!”

And as I said, let the threats commence. From the WashingtonExaminer.com:

‘Over our dead bodies’: Liberals threaten to ‘burn it all down’ if GOP replace Ginsburg before Election Day

by Andrew Mark Miller, 9-19-20

Former CNN host Reza Aslan joined several other verified Twitter accounts in threatening violence if Senate Republicans attempt to fill the Supreme Court seat of the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

“Over our dead bodies. Literally,” Aslan wrote in response to a tweet saying Sen. Mitch McConnell intends to fill Ginsberg’s seat, shortly after it was announced Friday that she had died at the age of 87.

Aslan also tweeted, “If they even TRY to replace RBG we burn the entire f—ing thing down.”

“If McConnell jams someone through, which he will, there will be riots,” Washington Post and GQ writer Laura Bassett said.

Director of Communications at the Anti-Violence Project Eliel Cruz agreed with Willimon’s calls to shut things down by calling on people to march on Washington and “just shut it down ourselves.”

Aaron Gouveia, author of a new book titled Raising Boys To Be Good Men: A Parent’s Guide to Bringing Up Happy Sons in a World Filled with Toxic Masculinity, responded to McConnell’s call to fill the vacant seat by tweeting, “F— no. Burn it all down.”

Writer and LGBT activist Charlotte Clymer opted not to wait until Republicans pushed a Ginsburg replacement through, deciding instead to head straight to McConnell’s home on Friday night.

“We’re now walking to Mitch McConnell’s house to protest,” Clymer said before tweeting out the intersection that McConnell allegedly lives on.

“His house is entirely dark,” she said later. “Significant police presence out front. It’s clear that he’s not here, as confirmed by a neighbor who is not fond of him. People are going home.”

Because that’s where the Demorat Party is these days.

McConnell received some support from fellow Republicans, including Sen. Ted Cruz, who agreed that a replacement should be voted on before the election, arguing that voters went to the polls in 2016 with the understanding they would likely be voting for the president who would fill Ginsburg’s seat.

“The president should next week nominate a successor to the court, and I think it is critical that the Senate takes up and confirms that successor before Election Day,” the Texas Republican said Friday night. “This nomination is why Donald Trump was elected.”

Then the standard Mark I, Model I JAFRs weighed in.

Several Senate Republicans, including Sen. Lisa Murkowski and Sen. Susan Collins, have made statements this year suggesting they would not support filling a SCOTUS vacancy this close to an election.

Democrats began vehemently opposing the move to fill the seat before the election immediately following Ginsburg’s death.

As indicated, there’s precedent.

There is historical precedent, as American Enterprise Institute fellow and former speechwriter for George W. Bush Marc Thiessen pointed out on Twitter, for Republicans to fill the seat so close to an election.

“*29 Presidents have had election year or lame duck vacancy -—all nominated someone,” Thiessen tweeted. “*8 x before election when other party controlled Senate — only 1 succeed. *10x before election when Pres and senate controlled by same party — 9 succeeded.”

Nancy Pelosi, of course, weighed in — in her preternaturally-cogent way.

But wait. The Demorats insisted a vacant SCOTUS seat be filled. At the end of Obama’s term. What changed?

But wait. Again. Didn’t Ruth Bader Ginsburg say something about this as well?

Here’s What RBG Said About Filling a SCOTUS Vacancy in an Election Year

by Matt Margolis, 9-19-20

As the debate over what to do about the vacancy on the Supreme Court is only getting started, perhaps we should heed the advice of the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg herself as to what to do.

When a similar scenario occurred four years ago, following the death of Antonin Scalia, the Republican-controlled Senate blocked Barack Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court. It was a controversial move, and Ginsburg had something to say about it:  Ginsburg publicly called on the Senate to go through with the nomination.

“That’s their job,” she said in July 2016. “There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the President stops being President in his last year.”

“Eight is not a good number for a collegial body that sometimes disagrees,” Ginsburg said on the issue a few months later during an event at the Smithsonian Museum of American History in Washington.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who was with her, agreed. “I think we hope there will be nine as quickly as possible.”

“What we do is we automatically affirm the decision of the court below. No opinion is written, no reasons are given, and the affirmance has no precedential value,” Ginsburg explained. “It’s just as though we denied review.”

There’s more. Here’s RBG from CNBC.com:

Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she opposes proposals from 2020 Democrats to expand the Supreme Court

by Tucker Higgins, 7-24-19

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she opposes proposals by Democratic presidential candidates to increase the number of seats on the Supreme Court because doing so would make it look partisan.

“It would be that — one side saying, ‘When we’re in power, we’re going to enlarge the number of judges, so we would have more people who would vote the way we want them to,’” Ginsburg told NPR in an interview that aired Wednesday.

“Nine seems to be a good number. It’s been that way for a long time,” she said Tuesday.

Several Democratic candidates have said they are open to increasing the size of the nine-justice court.

Former Texas Rep. Beto O’Rourke said shortly after entering the race that expanding the court to 15 members is an “idea we should explore.” Pete Buttigieg, the mayor of South Bend, Indiana, has made court reform a centerpiece of his campaign, including the idea of court expansion. Sens. Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren and Kirsten Gillibrand have said they are open to the idea.

But Ginsburg, the court’s most senior liberal justice, said the idea contradicts the premise of an independent judicial branch.

But guaranteed, very very guaranteed, you have NEVER heard of these stories or heard these audio cuts from the American Media Maggots. Purposely. You cannot afford to be actually informed or you begin to think clearly and independently.

Texas Senator Ted Cruz wrote:

Sen. Ted Cruz: After Ginsburg — 3 reasons why Senate must confirm her successor before Election Day

Here’s why President Trump must nominate a successor next week and why the Senate must confirm that successor before Election Day:

First, this nomination is why the American people elected Donald Trump as president and this confirmation is why the American people voted for a Republican majority in the U.S. Senate.

Second, twenty-nine times in our nation’s history we’ve seen a Supreme Court vacancy in an election year or before an inauguration and in every instance, the president proceeded with a nomination.

And finally, as we approach what is likely to be a contested election that hangs in the balance of the Supreme Court, our nation is at risk of a constitutional crisis without nine justices on the bench.

Obama himself said in 2016:

Note how the UK Daily Mail portrays RBG’s death:

Trump is expected to ignore RBG’s dying wish and nominate her replacement in days while Biden demands he wait until after the election so the American people can decide

  •  It was the dying wish of late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who passed away Friday, that the next president nominate her replacement

  • Trump is set to ignore her and announce a nomination in the coming days

  • His rival Biden has already hit out and demanded he wait until after the election

  • Even if Trump does nominate in the next few days, a group of rebel GOP senators may stop it being approved 

  • Senators Mitt Romney and Lisa Murkowski are among those expected to oppose a vote 

As if death wishes or emotions take precedent over the US Constitution.

As it is, Demorats refuse to face the difficult truth: if Ruth Bader Ginsburg weren’t all taken by herself, and if the Demorats under Obama were playing tactically, she would have retired and Obama could have appointed her replacement quite easily.

But no. That was her decision. And their decision. No one hosed the Demorats but Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the Demorats themselves.

At this point, it appears that Chuck Grassley and Mitt Romney have said they’ll vote in the Senate instead of refusing to vote.

Trump is expected to announce his nomination for SCOTUS this Friday or Saturday.

I suggest it may be Amy Coney Barrett.

And then next Tuesday? Will there be an actual debate between President Trump and Joe Biden? Will Joe suddenly be feeling poorly?

Time will tell.

BZ