Fed judge to State Dept: provide Clinton & Abedin documents in two weeks

Hillary Clinton On Her Cell Phone - Blackberry

“Security briefing?  I don’t need no stinkin’ security briefing.”

Just as I indicated last week was a bad week for Hillary, this week is turning out equally bad.  But you’d never know it because the American Media Maggots aren’t displaying her abrogations on page one, above the fold, or featured prominently up front on TV news segments.

Shocker, that.

From DailyCaller.com:

BREAKING: Judge Orders State Dept To Release Hillary’s Security Training Records, Or Be Deposed

by Richard Pollock

A federal judge ordered the Department of State Wednesday to produce for The Daily Caller News Foundation the security training records of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her aide Huma Abedin within two weeks, or face direct deposition of multiple government officials.

Oh my.  A direct deposition.  We can’t have that now, can we?

“I’m sure you can appreciate Mr. Lee, there is a certain time sensitivity on this issue,” U.S. District Court Judge Richard J. Leon told Department of Justice Attorney Jason Lee, representing the State Department. “We’re looking down the barrel of a presidential election from now in two months.”

Gosh.  A federal judge whose eyes are actually open and recognizes the political importance of having these documents produced in a timely manner.  Score one for Judge Leon.

TheDCNF filed the lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act last November, after the State Department refused to turn over all records of the security training for Clinton and her top aides.

In a July 29 State Department filing before Leon, attorneys for the State and Justice departments claimed they failed to locate any security briefing documents for Clinton or Abedin.

They further stated the absence of any documents meant that the “courses were not completed” by the secretary or her aides. It is unclear if Clinton explicitly refused to attend the security briefings.

Let’s be honest for a moment, however.  Would Hillary Clinton really need to attend any sort of security orientation or briefing?  She is, after all, Hillary Rodham Clinton and security orientations are for little people, not her.

The lack of training may help explain why Clinton saw no problem with setting up a private server in her New York home to process her private email account.

I’m not convinced.  She is, after all, Hillary Rodham Clinton and security orientations are for little people, not her.  She has a “history,” you see.

Clinton deliberately skipped a cybersecurity briefing in 2011, and defied national security officials by continuing to bring her unsecured BlackBerry cellphone into the confines of her secure office at the State Department.

You know me; I love this paragraph:

“Judge Leon made it clear that State can provide the simple clarifications we’ve sought one of two ways: either now, in a cooperative manner, or in a few weeks in sworn depositions,” said attorney Bradley Moss. “The choice is theirs to make.” Moss represents TheDCNF in the suit.

But wait, there’s more.  Tomorrow I tell you just why Hillary Clinton had a private server.

BZ

 

Hillary voter fraud caught on video, Pt II — Google HIDES Hillary voter fraud

Ah yes, more Hillary voter fraud in Nevada (What is it with Nevada anyway?):

You, of course, already watched Part I yesterday; click here to see it.

After embedding this video, I wondered: just what would you get in Google if you searched “Hillary voter fraud”?

Being Google and all, and being extra superior about its auto-filling logarithms, I immediately noticed that Google absolutely did not “auto-fill” as I typed on the keyboard.  You had to type the complete phrase “Hillary voter fraud” into the field and, even with that, there was nothing provided below until you hit the ENTER key.

Try it.

Hmmm, I thought, I wonder what other search engines might be yielding?

So I tried Bing.com.  Which, oddly enough, I’ve never tried before.  This time, at the point I got to “Hillary voter” this is what appeared below:

  • hillary voter fraud
  • hillary voter fraud exposed
  • hillary voters meme
  • hillary voter registration
  • hillary voters stupid
  • hillary voters are suckers
  • hillary voters
  • hillary voter suppression

How odd, I thought.  “Hillary voter fraud” came up immediately and was at the top of the list.  My guess: this is precisely what most persons are searching for when they begin typing that phrase.

But wait, I thought.  There are other search engines.  I wonder what Yahoo.com would show?  I wrote “Hillary voter” in the field and this is what I received:

  • hillary voter fraud
  • hillary voters grave markers
  • hillary voters
  • hillary voter suppression
  • hillary voter cartoon
  • hillary voter registration
  • hillary voter stumped
  • hillary voter turnout
  • hillary voter fraud cartoon
  • hillary voter fraud lawsuit

Once again, “Hillary voter fraud” came out on top.  A real chin-scratcher, that.  But what the hell, let’s try it one more time.  I lastly went to Ask.com using the same methods.  It came up with:

  • hillary voter fraud
  • hillary voter fraud exposed
  • hillary voters meme
  • hillary voter registration
  • hillary voters stupid
  • hillary voters are suckers
  • hillary voters
  • hillary voter fraud iowa

I suspected I was starting to see a pattern.  It made me wonder: do you think that Google would in any way purposely jiggle its search engine AlGoreIthms with regard to Hillary Clinton or the Democrats or Leftists or voter fraud identification/information on behalf of the Democrats?

Would Larry Page or Sergei Brin or Alphabet or Eric Schmidt or Ruth Porat actually lean left on as serious an issue as this?  As in, purposely skewing or hiding results that became immediately obvious on other search engines?

Nah.

BZ

P.S.

Obama Meets Silicon Valley Tech LeadersAbove, please note Barack Hussein Obama meeting personally and intimately with Silicon Valley tech leaders on February 17, 2011, to include Apple CEO Steve Jobs, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Oracle CEO Larry Ellison, Google CEO Eric Schmidt (far Left, imagine that) and Twitter CEO Dick Costolo.

 

State Department assists with Hillary’s corruption

Hillary Clinton CORRUPTWe already know that it took three years for the Associated Press — AP — to get records from the US State Department regarding Hillary Clinton’s meetings

The first story, from the NationalReview.com:

Clinton State Department Stonewalled AP for Three Years

by NRO Staff

It was a long wait. Today’s blockbuster report from the Associated Press about Hillary Clinton’s meetings with Clinton Foundation donors during her time as Secretary of State contained the following nugget: “The AP sought Clinton’s calendar and schedules three years ago, but delays led the AP to sue the State Department last year in federal court for those materials and other records.” Three years ago. The long wait was in keeping with a practice of slow-walking such requests for information.

Why was the AP stonewalled?  Because they suspected this:

Over 50% of the persons who met Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State ended up donating to the Clinton Foundation.

See my Thursday post entitled, Hillary’s corrupt “pay to play” — a three year AP story.

The very picture of corruption from Hillary Clinton and the Obama Department of State.

There is an update to this, clearly indicating more corruption and coverups from the Barack Hussein Obama Department of State, in order to assist fellow Demorat presidential nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Let us not forget this cringeworthy video where the State Department shows its embrace of obfuscation and contempt for actual worthwhile questions.  “Am I not speaking English?” you have to admit, is likely one of the all-time greatest journalistic questions.

From the AP:

US: CLINTON CALENDARS WON’T BE RELEASED UNTIL AFTER ELECTION

by Ted Bridis

WASHINGTON (AP) — Seven months after a federal judge ordered the State Department to begin releasing monthly batches of the detailed daily schedules showing meetings by Hillary Clinton during her time as secretary of state, the government told The Associated Press it won’t finish the job before Election Day.

Please note the word “won’t” as opposed to “can’t.”

The department has so far released about half of the schedules. Its lawyers said in a phone conference with the AP’s lawyers that the department now expects to release the last of the detailed schedules around Dec. 30, weeks before the next president is inaugurated.

Perfect.  Just in time to shield Hillary Clinton as much as possible.

Under the present rate, a government attorney working on behalf of the State Department notified the AP’s lawyers, it will take about four and one-half months – or until Dec. 30 – to release all the remaining schedules through the end of Clinton’s term, in February 2013. The government’s notice late Thursday was the first time the State Department has provided the AP with a measure of how many pages were remaining and when it expected to complete the job.

Ladies and gentlemen, you would have to be a brain-addled dolt to not see the corruption that bleeds from Hillary Clinton, from the State Department and the Obama administration which surely is complicit.  All Mr Obama would have to do is make one telephone call in order to light a fire under the State Department.

But he won’t do it, because it’s part and parcel of the partisan cover-up and corruption endemic with Demorats and the Obama administration.

There is only ONE reason why the job won’t be finished until after the election.

Can you imagine a Republican administration or Republican former Secretary of State being able to get away with this in front of the American Media Maggots?

BZ

Hillary Clinton Muslim Contributions

Hillary’s corrupt “pay to play” — a three year AP story

Hillary Clinton Common Good

“Then I’m going to give them to the Clinton Foundation and, specifically, me and Bill.”

What a grand week for Hillary Clinton!

After all, isn’t it said that “any publicity is good publicity”?

Hillary has certain earned her publicity this week.

The phrase “pay to play” was brought back to the forefront this week when AP broke the story — after three years of legal wrangling against the US State Department.

From Yahoo.com via AP:

Many donors to Clinton Foundation met with her at State

WASHINGTON (AP) — More than half the people outside the government who met with Hillary Clinton while she was secretary of state gave money — either personally or through companies or groups — to the Clinton Foundation. It’s an extraordinary proportion indicating her possible ethics challenges if elected president.

At least 85 of 154 people from private interests who met or had phone conversations scheduled with Clinton while she led the State Department donated to her family charity or pledged commitments to its international programs, according to a review of State Department calendars released so far to The Associated Press. Combined, the 85 donors contributed as much as $156 million. At least 40 donated more than $100,000 each, and 20 gave more than $1 million.

Donors who were granted time with Clinton included an internationally known economist who asked for her help as the Bangladesh government pressured him to resign from a nonprofit bank he ran; a Wall Street executive who sought Clinton’s help with a visa problem; and Estee Lauder executives who were listed as meeting with Clinton while her department worked with the firm’s corporate charity to counter gender-based violence in South Africa.

And that is the real story; let it sink in and percolate about in your brain pan:

Over 50% of the persons who met Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State ended up donating to the Clinton Foundation.  Perhaps the better portrayal is this: “donating.”  Air quotes.

Combined, the 85 donors contributed as much as $156 million. At least 40 donated more than $100,000 each, and 20 gave more than $1 million.

The Clinton Foundation has already “taken in” — air quotes — more than $2 billion dollars in funding since its creation in 2000.  In that time, there have been roughly 6,000 “donors” — air quotes — to the foundation.

“There’s a lot of potential conflicts and a lot of potential problems,” said Douglas White, an expert on nonprofits who previously directed Columbia University’s graduate fundraising management program. “The point is, she can’t just walk away from these 6,000 donors.”

This is Orwellian Newspeak for “these people paid cash and they expect something in return.”  You know.  Pay to play.  And they expect some play for their pay.

Here’s a little clincher buried deep in the story.  Read it and interpret it.  I can interpret it no other way than one.

Former senior White House ethics officials said a Clinton administration would have to take careful steps to ensure that past foundation donors would not have the same access as she allowed at the State Department.

What does that say to you?  To me it screams: she did it.  She took money for access to her in her role as Secretary of State.  Corruption.  No other word for it.

Some of Clinton’s most influential visitors donated millions to the Clinton Foundation and to her and her husband’s political coffers.

Now it’s personal money — not just to the foundation, but to the Clintons themselves.

Please read the story in full — a story that took the AP a full three years to acquire because of legal obstacles placed in its way by the State Department.  You know: the same State Department from which Hillary was Secretary.  From the NationalReview.com:

Clinton State Department Stonewalled AP for Three Years

by NRO Staff

It was a long wait. Today’s blockbuster report from the Associated Press about Hillary Clinton’s meetings with Clinton Foundation donors during her time as Secretary of State contained the following nugget: “The AP sought Clinton’s calendar and schedules three years ago, but delays led the AP to sue the State Department last year in federal court for those materials and other records.” Three years ago. The long wait was in keeping with a practice of slow-walking such requests for information.

As in: the State Department did its level best to block, stall and obfuscate the acquisition of the truth about Hillary Rodham Clinton by the Associated Press.

Let’s see; this past week’s Hillary publicity included:

Ah yes.  What a wonderful, engaging and revelatory week it was for Hillary Rodham Clinton.

BZ