DC Homicides:

Black Crime[Meanwhile, back at the ranch.]

I was scurrilously chasing down negative events in the life of Mr Obama (as in) .  .  .

- Tracked movements via key card, traced calls, searched email...
- FLASHBACK: Admin war on FOX...
- REPORT: DOJ Leaked Docs to Smear Fast & Furious Whistleblower...
- Administration's Two-Front War...
- RNC Chief: Obama Creating 'Atomsphere of Guerilla Warfare'...
- Congressman: Impeachment is an option...
- 'Richard Milhous Obama'...

.  .  . whilst in the process of seeking a new post topic, when I came upon this little ditty in the sidebar of a Washington Post article:

Homicides in the District

The Post tracked all homicides in D.C. between 2000 and 2011 to learn what happened to each case. It found that fewer than a third of the homicides have led to a conviction for murder or manslaughter. Find homicides in your neighborhood and see citywide trends here.

Some of my first thoughts:

- And this, DC, an area with a long and proud history of Management By Leftists whose first thought is to create infinite laws proscribing firearms.

- Because, apparently, all those anti-firearm laws have been to the great benefit of DC itself, yes?

- The citizens of DC buttressed, of course, in their witnessing and testimony in the numerous homicide investigations extant and in the past, secure in the knowledge that DC’s firearms laws will ensure their forthright and honest statements to the police, and that those black citizens and their families who have been victimized will stand up for their loved ones who have been heinously gunned down in cold blood.

- Unless, of course, those surviving family members happen to be of the same criminal ilk or gang of the victims and, due to that allegiance, find it incumbent not to cooperate in any fashion with the police.

- Because of the inherent doomed gangbanger and Free Cheese welfare lifestyle they have purposely chosen and purposely and steadfastly refuse to disavow.  This is, after all, black-on-black crime.

For clarity, I now refer to a wonderful 1991 book by David Simon, “Homicide,” which spawned not only the TV show “Homicide” but Simon’s “The Wire” as well, whose detectives believed in the 10 Rules of a Homicide Investigation:

  1. Everyone lies. Murderers lie because they have to; witnesses and other participants lie because they think they have to; everyone else lies for the sheer joy of it, and to uphold a general principle that under no circumstances do you provide accurate information to a cop.
  2. The victim is killed once, but a crime scene can be murdered a thousand times.
  3. The initial 10 or 12 hours after a murder are the most critical to the success of an investigation.
  4. An innocent man left alone in an interrogation room will remain fully awake, rubbing his eyes, staring at the cubicle walls and scratching himself in dark, forbidden places. A guilty man left alone in an interrogation room goes to sleep.
  5. It’s good to be good; it’s better to be lucky.
  6. When a suspect is immediately identified in an assault case, the victim is sure to live. When no suspect has been identified, the victim will surely die.
  7. First, they’re red. Then they’re green. Then they’re black. (Referring to the color of an open case on the board, the money that must be spent to investigate the case, and the color of the solved murder as it is listed on the board)
  8. In any case where there is no apparent suspect, the crime lab will produce no valuable evidence. In those cases where a suspect has already confessed and been identified by at least two eyewitnesses, the lab will give you print hits, fiber evidence, blood typings and a ballistic match.
  9. To a jury, any doubt is reasonable; the better the case, the worse the jury; a good man is hard to find, but 12 of them, gathered together in one place, is a miracle.
  10. There is no such a thing as a perfect murder. Always has been, and anyone who tries to prove otherwise merely proves himself naive and romantic, a fool who is ignorant of Rules 1 through 9.

Let us now reflect on the wonders of Leftists and Demorats who began the trend of forcefully and systematically separating black fathers from the family unit in the 60s under the guise of LBJ’s Great Society, and whose steadfast political Free Cheese betrayal has resulted in the outright butchering of hundreds of thousands of black males, women, children, infants and the unborn due to violence and abortion.

Yeah, those gun laws, the Free Cheese, that certainly has had its benefits to the “black community” has it not, ladies and gentlemen?

BZ

 

 

Criticizing Obama: “offensive”

And to that I reply: “did someone say pull out all the stops on this post?”

Why, yes, I suppose someone did.

Obama got voted into office in his first and second terms because he is black.  Plain and simple.  He’s black enough to vote for, convenient for some, inconvenient for others.  He’s black like this:

Barack Hussein Obama Smiling

Figure 1.  Mr Obama

Not black like this:

King Samir Shabazz, Black Panther Party Leader

Figure 2.  Not Mr Obama

No GOWP would admit it, but their votes are prejudiced in and of themselves.  They would never vote for a black man who appears like Shabazz.  The nose is too flat, the skin too dark, the scowl too offensive, the tattoos, the dreadlocks; no, that simply cannot be.  He is not a “clean” black man.

And that is what GOWPs and other racists who voted for Mr Obama simply because of his melanin count acquired: a “clean” black man and nothing more.  Oh, but wait: with a few other exceptions:

He has NPD, he is arrogant, a megalomaniac, literally raised by Communists and good friends with William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn (both committed white Communist insurrectionists).

William Ayers on the US FlagHis pastor was the Reverend Jeremiah Wright:

Samuel L Jackson admitted he voted for Barack Hussein Obama solely because he was black.  So did an admitted 90% + of black Americans.  And GOWPs weighed in (Guilty Overeducated White People) also for the same reason, because Mr Obama was clean (see Figure A).  Not like the other man (see Figure B).

With Mr Obama, his minions, his sycophants, his supporters, his educators, his creators, it all comes down to one thing: race.  Well, okay, and a few other things as well, to include Cloward-Piven and anarchy and tearing down America.  Heavy sigh.

Racists, all of them; including Mr Obama.  They fail to see people as individuals, they see people only in terms of color.

That said, new headlines from the WCO (Water Carriers for Obama), the New York Times:

White House Aide Calls Criticism of Obama ‘Offensive’

A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”

He (Dan Pfeiffer) pointedly rejected Republican criticisms of the president’s actions and leadership style as “offensive” and “absurd,” and he said the administration would not be distracted from doing the nation’s business.

And there you have it in one complete and easily summarized little nutshell: those four Americans who died in Benghazi died for nothing, and to demand the truth, an accountability and responsibility during Mr Obama’s watch is “offensive.”

But let’s just complete that sentence, ladies and gentlemen: “the criticism is offensive because _____  __  _____.”

Please allow me to fill in the final three words: “Obama is black.”

How dare you treat Mr Obama like any other president because, after all, Mr Obama is black.  Which makes anyone demanding accountability a racist.

See how easy that was?  It’s called deflection and it works for GOWPs because it stirs up emotions: they feel guilty; it works for blacks because they voted for The Black Man due to his melanin count and nothing more.

Mr Obama helps himself out because of his narrow racial views as well.

He says that, as a “African American” (a hyphenate) you must work “twice as hard.”

My point precisely!  It takes an incredible work ethic to get up at roughly noon in order to sling drugs in the neighborhood.  Oh, that’s right, yes: the neighborhood I see every day, where my wife lives.  It takes an incredible work ethic to open your garage door and invite your partying friends over late at night, drinking beer, smoking dope, and hosting all the local thump cars: dopers in their new Dodge Chargers, Conestoga Wagons, 1975 Cadillacs, black Escalades with spinners (though spinners are so yesterday).  Oh, that’s right, yes: the neighborhood I see every day, where my wife lives.  And it takes an incredible work ethic to be in your 20s and play basketball in your driveway all day, every day, with your 20-something friends as well.  Basketball is hard work!  Oh, that’s right, yes: the neighborhood I see every day, where my wife lives.  Neighbors driving newer cars, with newer toys, TVs, motorcycles, clothing, and seldom leaving the house but for a few minutes.  As in: not going to work.  Oh, that’s right, yes: the neighborhood I see every day, where my wife lives.

It took a black officer of rank on our department tons of sweat and arduous times in order to achieve his position so that he could swive women extramaritally and become corrupt to the point where the administration must keep him out of the way and buried if for no other reason than he can no longer testify in open court.  A man taken right out of the academy and placed into a prestigious unit because — wait for it — he is black.  And throughout all of that no one has fired him because — wait for it — he is black.  Where a white female Captain told me years ago that I would not get promoted because — wait for it — I am a Caucasoid male.  I still hand it to her: that took large balls to tell me the actual truth.

Ah yes, racial clarity: this country is still populated by racists.

But, I submit, they’re precisely the opposite of who you think they are.  And racism, these days, starts right at the top.

Trust me when I tell you: I am so fucking tired of racists playing the race card themselves.

BZ

 

 

Redskins QB a “cornball brother”

bounty black panther hypocrisyWhy?

Because in USA Today he was quoted as saying:

“For me, you don’t ever want to be defined by the color of your skin. You want to be defined by your work ethic, the person that you are, your character, your personality. That’s what I’ve tried to go out and do.  I am an African-American in America. That will never change. But I don’t have to be defined by that.’’

Robert Parker, a black ESPN commentator, disagrees — as he called Robert Griffin III a “cornball brother.”  Translated: you’re not sufficiently “down” for blacks.

Apparently Mr Parker has never heard of or read anything of Martin Luther King, Jr:

“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.”

Additional black hypocrisy, anyone?

BZ

 

 

US Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez considers laws on “blasphemy”

First, watch the video:

What conclusion can you draw other than a major high-ranking US federal government official is disinterested in upholding the First Amendment of the US  Constitution?

Specifically, in July of this year, Representative Trent Franks (R – Arizona, 2nd District) speaks with AAG Perez in an attempt to acquire an affirmation of free speech.

Which, as you can see, was avoided like the proverbial plague.

Like attempting to nail Jello to a tree.

However, let me do what I call the “logical extension,” and that is this: “blasphemy” would include Islam.  Perhaps Buddhism.  Perhaps Hinduism.  Perhaps Sikhism.  Perhaps Shinto.  Perhaps Rastafarianism.  Perhaps Scientology.

But not to include either Christianity or Judaism.  And trust me when I tell you: Islam will be on TOP of the Blasphemic Heap.

Isn’t it reassuring to realize your foundational First Amendment is held in such high regard by members of the current Obama Administration?

BZ