I told you he would be found NOT GUILTY.
Let the stupidity in Florida commence.
BZ
P.S.
Blacks shall riot as whites rioted following the OJ Simpson verdict, yes?
Because, reasonably, all things are equal in the courts’ eyes, politics and thoughts of the law — are they not?
I am astounded by this poll.
It represents the truth, but I still find it amazing to have seen the light of day.
From RasmussenReports.com:
Wednesday, July 03, 2013
Americans consider blacks more likely to be racist than whites and Hispanics in this country.
Thirty-seven percent (37%) of American Adults think most black Americans are racist, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. Just 15% consider most white Americans racist, while 18% say the same of most Hispanic Americans. (To see survey question wording, click here.)
There is a huge ideological difference on this topic. Among conservative Americans, 49% consider most blacks racist, and only 12% see most whites that way. Among liberal voters, 27% see most white Americans as racist, and 21% say the same about black Americans.
From a partisan perspective, 49% of Republicans see most black Americans as racist, along with 36% of unaffiliated adults and 29% of Democrats.
Among black Americans, 31% think most blacks are racist, while 24% consider most whites racist and 15% view most Hispanics that way.
Read the rest of the article.
That said, do you think this video had anything to do with the polling results?
Of course not. And AG Eric Holder — a black man — actively deciding to not prosecute this incident on behalf of his black president? Why, that would have nothing to do with this poll.
Would it?
Philadelphia did it again in 2012:
Whilst in the mid-90s, my Robbery Bureau supervisor (when I was a detective in that bureau) told me that I couldn’t publish the actual stats in my department regarding robberies because it could be interpreted as racist: 84% of the robberies in my entire county were perpetrated by blacks affiliated with black gangs.
My then-division commander in 2000 told me that I was not selected for promotion because I was a white male. She at least had the balls that other male captains hadn’t.
Opposing ObamaCare is racist. Not wanting to employ a criminal makes you a racist. The History Channel is racist. Your toaster is racist. Your baby is racist. Your cat is racist.
Anyone besides me starting to find this crap tedious?
Stupid but true and caught on video:
Stupid but true again: Mr Obama will pay for blacks’ gas and mortgages:
The news reports at the time, in the late 1980s, were horrific. Tawana Brawley, a 15-year-old African-American girl from the New York City area, was said to have been abducted and repeatedly raped by six white men. She was found with “KKK” written across her chest, a racial epithet on her stomach and her hair smeared with feces. She was so traumatized, according to reports, that at the hospital she answered yes-or-no questions by blinking her eyes. Making the crime even more vile, if that were possible, she and her lawyers later claimed that two of the rapists were law enforcement officials.
Ms. Brawley’s spokesman was the Rev. Al Sharpton — a dapper television personality and political commentator these days, but a fiery street activist back then. At a news conference, he named suspects.
Then, of course, it all fell apart. Complete and utter fabricated crap.
And about six months after the hoax, Ms. Brawley’s former boyfriend told Newsday that she had invented the allegations, apparently to avoid a beating by her mother’s boyfriend after running away from home for four days.
Which was the most racist party of all historically? Correct: Democrats. Which party freed slaves? Correct: Republicans. With what party was George Wallace affiliated? Correct: Democrat. What party was Martin Luther King, Jr affiliated? Correct: Republican.
Facts you do not hear or read of from the American Media Maggots.
Who are today’s Racial and Poverty Pimps? Correct: Sharpton and Jackson. Check their financials. Ask actual questions. Have an actual inquisitive mind.
There are so many other places I could go and other things I could say. And, of course, I know nothing about this. Not because I’ve been in law enforcement for 42 years. And not because I see it every day via my wife’s house, isolated, in Ghetto Centrale — a place she cannot afford to leave, where the scrawny black dude down the street slings dope every day and where our law enforcement budget is slashed to make way for the expansion of social services enabling even more Free Cheese in Fornicalia.
So, truly, am I shocked by this poll?
Not at all. It finally starts to reflect the actual situation, in at least my state.
Does the worm begin to turn?
BZ
Yes, given; this is a lengthy video and most of you won’t play it in full. Still I post it.
But if you want to see what an actual concerned politician looks like in public, then click on the red button below:
Please listen to this, ladies and gentlemen, because the devil IS in the details. This bill will create an enormous incentive to hire those here illegally, and a penalty for hiring US citizens.
BZ
From Breitbart.com:
Really? Lawbreakers given an edge?
Even in the future, breaking the law won’t stop progress on what VP Joe Biden calls the “unfettered path” to citizenship.
The Corker Amendment ostensibly addresses measures to beef up border security. It, however, is also likely to be the last amendment considered on the immigration bill. As such, it has become a 1,000+ page amendment to supplant the current proposal and provide multiple new provisions. It has become the vehicle for ObamaCare 2.0.
Buried within the text of the Amendment is a seemingly innocuous provision:
(f) APPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN GROUNDS OF INADMISSIBILITY.—In determining an alien’s inadmissibility under this section, section 212(a)(9)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(9)(B)) shall not apply.
What does that mean?
Current law states that those applying for green cards are ineligible if they are either “illegally present” at any point or overstay the terms of their work visa. Such an immigrant, in current law, would have to return to their home country and restart the immigration process. The Corker Amendment wipes away that enforcement mechanism.
As I am frequently wont to say: “you ever read or hear of this on any other media, alternative or otherwise?”
Uh, no. You won’t.
BZ
A blatant and bald-faced LIE.
From RT.com:
The FBI uses drones for domestic surveillance purposes, the head of the agency told Congress early Wednesday.
Robert Mueller, the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, confirmed to lawmakers that the FBI owns several unmanned aerial vehicles, but has not adopted any strict policies or guidelines yet to govern the use of the controversial aircraft.
“Does the FBI use drones for surveillance on US soil?” Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) asked Mr Mueller during an oversight hearing on Capitol Hill Wednesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
“Yes,” Mueller responded bluntly, adding that the FBI’s operation of drones is “very seldom.”
Asked by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-California) to elaborate, Mueller added, “It’s very seldom used and generally used in a particular incident where you need the capability.” Earlier in the morning, however, Mueller said that the agency was only now working to establish set rules for the drone program.
A lie before; a lie again.
Let us not forget this is the same blithering idiot — FBI Director Robert Mueller — who conveniently knew “nothing” about the IRS scandal.
And it is that you trust your federal government to do what precisely?
BZ
