“It’s an institutional culture in government. We don’t want to go after our predecessors because we don’t want our successors to come after us.”
And now you know the central theme in DC decision-making, at least predominantly on the side of the Republicans.
You may apply this to every situation in which you ask the question “so why was nothing done and why is no one accountable in DC for anything at any time?”
You can thank Judge Andrew Napolitano for providing the obvious answer.
Many of us intuited this; now there is no question.
No one will say it but I believe, given her displays the past year or so, that Demorat Nancy Pelosi is exhibiting symptoms of Alzheimers or an Alzheimers-like disease.
We recall, of course, that the American Media Maggots excoriated President Reagan towards the end of his presidency, yet they are strangely silent when it concerns Nancy Pelosi’s bizarre behavior. We know the reason.
The question becomes this: is it why Demorats are now attempting to get Nancy Pelosi to move aside and “move on” from politics?
Featuring Right thinking from a left brain, doing the job the American Media Maggots won’t, embracing ubiquitous, sagacious perspicacity and broadcasting behind enemy lines in Occupied Fornicalia from the veritable Belly of the Beast, the Bill Mill in Sacramento, Fornicalia, I continue to proffer my thanks to the SHR Media Network for allowing me to utilize their studio and hijack their air twice weekly, Tuesdays and Thursdays, thanks to my shameless contract, as well as appear on the Sack Heads Radio Show each Wednesday evening.
I termed Tuesday night’s show the Racist/Leftist Insanity Special for reasons to be patently obvious upon listening and/or watching.
Tonight in the Saloon:
Jersey Joe is back in studio, having survived Hurricane Irma in Florida; apparently all the blessings sent his way did in fact function appropriately;
Happy Stories: SCOTUS upholds Trump’s travel stay; more to come;
I tell the terrible truth about 9/11, as this show occurred one day after; listener discretion is advised. Seriously.
The FEC wants to remove your freedom of speech once again;
BLM has 10 demands for Caucasoids;
Melanie Collette pens a stolid and courageous article about blacks in America;
It was a racist Tweet which kept Colin Kaepernick from being hired by the Ravens;
Elbert Guillory on so-called “white privilege;”
This past Sunday the Cleveland Browns stood arm-in-arm with local law enforcement; this is an act to be emulated throughout the entire NFL;
ESPN pulls Asian broadcaster off sports venue because he’s named Robert Lee;
Tucker Carlson says President Trump’s watching the eclipse directly is “the most impressive thing any president has ever done.” Right;
Greg Gutfeld on the American Media Maggots;
ESPN throws Sergio Dipp to the wolves because of “diversity”;
Hillary Clinton announces: no more election campaigns for me. THANK GOD;
The media finally begins to recognize the Hillary Clinton email scandal;
If you care to listen to the show in Spreaker, please click on start.
If you care to watch the show on YouTube, please click on start. Disregard the labeling; it really is my show.
This Thursday we feature The Underground Professor himself, Dr Michael Jones, as he weighs in on Sanctuary Cities as well as the newest ruling by SCOTUS in re the Trump travel stay. Don’t miss it!
Please join me, the Bloviating Zeppelin(on Twitter @BZep and on Gab.ai @BZep), every Tuesday and Thursday night on the SHR Media Network from 11 PM to 1 AM Eastern and 8 PM to 10 PM Pacific, at the Berserk Bobcat Saloon — where the speech is free but the drinks are not.
As ever, thank you so kindly for listening, commenting, and interacting in the chat room or listening later via podcast.
Want to listen to all the Berserk Bobcat Saloon archives in podcast? Go here. Want to watch the past shows on YouTube? Please visit the SHR Media Network YouTube channel here.
BZ
The SHR Media Network Studio 7 from which BZ broadcasts Tuesdays and Thursdays.
They’ve repeatedly tried and failed to impose regulations on Internet political communications, possibly even media sites like the Drudge Report, but congressional testimony that unnamed Russians spent $100,000 for politically themed ads on Facebook is sparking a new bid by Democrats on the Federal Election Commission.
The FEC, specifically, tried back in 2014 as Paul Bedard, the author of this newest article above, documented here:
FEC chair warns that conservative media like Drudge Report and Sean Hannity face regulation — like PACs
by Paul Bedard
Government officials, reacting to the growing voice of conservative news outlets, especially on the internet, are angling to curtail the media’s exemption from federal election laws governing political organizations, a potentially chilling intervention that the chairman of the Federal Election Commission is vowing to fight.
The real truth is this — no more complicated.
“The right has begun to break the left’s media monopoly, particularly through new media outlets like the internet, and I sense that some on the left are starting to rethink the breadth of the media exemption and internet communications,” he added.
When you cannot win the war of ideas, that is to say “the message,” then your only alternative is to shut down “the messenger” which, in these cases, translates to the internet itself and some sites specifically, like Drudge. Mine is next. So is yours.
(FEC Chairman Lee Goodman) added, “Truth be told, I want conservative media to have the same exemption as all other media.”
That translates to, as I have said for quite some time: “No one is equal until everyone is equal.”
The history explained here, as well.
You can already see the Leftist social media giants shutting down free speech. But whose free speech? Those on the right. Leftist speech remains predominantly uninterrupted, undisturbed and inviolate unless it is so shockingly egregious that even the American Media Maggots begin to notice a bit. Even then, not consistently. Death threats against President Trump on Twitter, for example, tend to remain unless they are somehow brought to light. Massive light.
Liberals over the years have also pushed for a change in the Federal Communications Commission‘s “fairness doctrine” to cut off conservative voices, and retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens has delighted Democrats recently with a proposed Constitutional amendment that some say could force the media to stop endorsing candidates or promoting issues.
At one point the “fairness doctrine” — which is the precise opposite, of course — ruled in media. Its attempt, originally, was to actually ensure some semblance of “fairness” in broadcasting when media choices were extremely limited, the precise opposite of today.
See my previous posts about the so-called “Fairness Doctrine”:
I value two things primarily: honesty and clarity. So let’s be clear: the only reason the FEC or the FCC wish to limit and regulate speech under the guise of “fairness” or “equanimity” is to limit the speech of only one side: the conservative side. To limit the dissemination of information which thusly informs voters and allows Conservatives to acquire facts, data and particulars on political issues.
Because, after all, everything is political now.
Finally: where are the Republicans on this? Why no public GOP umbrage over the issue? Statements? Decisions to oppose? Republicans taking a stand against this?
Another reason Conservative trust in the GOP has almost vanished.
Where is the reality, the truth of what actually occurred on September 11th of 2001?
Since that fateful Tuesday, I have said that we — Americans — need to see what really happened to the occupants of the Twin Towers. We need to see and hear and read and understand what truly transpired with the lives of those who were killed that day. Because, you see, most of these real-life sights and sounds have been sanitized and scrubbed from the media these days; we find such things too disturbing, too graphic. Our dainty sensibilities might become offended.
Ladies and gentlemen, I am here to offend. I am pushback. I am here to remind you in stark, gravid detail, color and description. I couldn’t care less if you are a snowflake. I am here to show you the 9/11 jumpers and the decisions they made.
Here is what happened to the jumpers and those still trapped within the Twin Towers: one million tons — two billion pounds (2,000,000,000) — of concrete and steel fell down upon citizens of the United States of America, turning human tissue to liquid and leaving most with no way of being identified whatsoever.
The science of falling human flesh indicates that an average 200 pound human being, with air resistance, will eventually reach a terminal velocity of around 53 m/s (195 km/h or 122 mph). The Twin Towers were 1,362 feet tall. We know that 99% of the terminal velocity for a human will be reached at around 1,880 feet. Since we also know that Americans did not jump from the top of the buildings but, instead, some stories down, it would be scientifically safe to posit that jumpers reached between 100 and 110 mph at their point of impact with the metal or concrete below.
This is what awaited the jumpers as they took their final step.
A common misconception is that many died mid-jump. That is incorrect. The bulk died upon impact; only those who were already suffering from traumatic burns or egregious wounds may — and I say may — have died enroute their impact sites.
For most, at their velocities, they had a full 10 to 14 seconds to impact. Almost all were completely conscious and, if their eyes were open, they would have seen the World Trade Center become rapidly smaller if they were on their backs, or shockingly larger if they were on their stomachs not unlike a sky diver. Some may have even had their eyes open upon impact. Some may actually have had the rush of the air resistance physically rip pieces of burned flesh and clothing from their bodies as they fell.
You are an employee within the World Trade Centers that day. You would not know what was happening to you, as we know today in hindsight. You would be confused, in panic mode. You would either have survived or, trapped on certain floors with others, you would be attempting to locate a way out.
You could have been splashed with Jet-A fuel (Jet-A powers modern commercial airliners and is a mix of pure kerosene and anti-freeze) and set ablaze immediately. Or you could be surrounded by burning objects and left with only one possible exit strategy: try to somehow knock out a window to the outside world.
Knowing as we do the fire triangle — that is to say, combustion requires oxygen, heat and fuel — we know that when persons trapped in the WTC even managed to break open the windows, the resultant air flow would have enabled flames to burn even hotter by enriching the oxygen content.
Now you have a choice. Imagine. You can burn to death via the flames behind you, or you can knock out a window. If you fail to knock out a window, yes, you burn to death. If you knock out a window or locate a window aperture already damaged, you have time to contemplate. Perhaps a few minutes, perhaps a few seconds. Do you turn to face the flames? Or do you seek the very thing that keeps you alive and has done so for years? The open air?
Perhaps now the flames are licking at your back. You have seen some of your friends, or persons you don’t know, step out into the abyss, their choices having been made. Again, your choice: do I burn to death or do I simply jump?
And that, you recognize with finality, is the sum total of your life.
Here is how and where you end.
You did what you did, you loved who you loved, you accomplished what you accomplished, only to have your life reach this point: I am going to choose death, either way. Your brain sees and twists things, your entire life, years, into a few seconds. The lizard brain rules. Survival. Only this time survival equals death. Either way. You lose.
Your brain asks: how did I get here? It doesn’t matter. You’re here now.
There is an open portal. The air is rushing past you because of the broken WTC window on this perfect day, this blue sky day, this day without clouds, this day that embraces you and now somehow beckons. You see momentarily the land and the sea before and below and the seemingly strong winds blow what hair you have left back if it isn’t already burned off.
Some people wished they could have opened a window for fresh ventilation at the WTC. You may have been one of those. But now your wish is not to have been anywhere near an open window at this juncture.
Except that: now, the clothing on your back is on fire.
This may be the most important post I’ll write the rest of the year.
Featuring Right thinking from a left brain, doing the job the American Media Maggots won’t, embracing ubiquitous, sagacious perspicacity and broadcasting behind enemy lines in Occupied Fornicalia from the veritable Belly of the Beast, the Bill Mill in Sacramento, Fornicalia, I continue to proffer my thanks to the 
weighs in on Sanctuary Cities as well as the newest ruling by SCOTUS in re the Trump travel stay. Don’t miss it!
First, from the 
Never forget.
The science of falling human flesh indicates that an average 200 pound human being, with air resistance, will eventually reach a terminal velocity of around 53 m/s (195 km/h or 122 mph). The Twin Towers were 1,362 feet tall. We know that 99% of the terminal velocity for a human will be reached at around 1,880 feet. Since we also know that Americans did not jump from the top of the buildings but, instead, some stories down, it would be scientifically safe to posit that jumpers reached between 100 and 110 mph at their point of impact with the metal or concrete below.
A common misconception is that many died mid-jump. That is incorrect. The bulk died upon impact; only those who were already suffering from traumatic burns or egregious wounds may — and I say may — have died enroute their impact sites.
And that, you recognize with finality, is the sum total of your life.
Turn or go forward. You go forward.